Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

On 2012-07-10, Georg Baum wrote: Guenter Milde wrote: If I understand right, (american) English is the default language for LaTeX, but not for CJK-LaTeX. I believe it is the same (american english) when using CJK.sty (or what did you mean by CJK-LaTeX?). Dou you have a documentation

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

On 2012-07-10, Georg Baum wrote: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

On 2012-07-10, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> If I understand right, (american) English is the default language for >> LaTeX, but not for CJK-LaTeX. > I believe it is the same (american english) when using CJK.sty (or what did > you mean by CJK-LaTeX?). Dou you have a documentation

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

On 2012-07-10, Georg Baum wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: >>> Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, >>> english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command >>> (or rather the preamble in this case) in this

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All other languages do not appear

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Guenter Milde wrote: If I understand right, (american) English is the default language for LaTeX, but not for CJK-LaTeX. I believe it is the same (american english) when using CJK.sty (or what did you mean by CJK-LaTeX?). Dou you have a documentation pointer? Besides this, there are other

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: > >> Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, >> english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command >> (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All other >> languages do not

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Guenter Milde wrote: > If I understand right, (american) English is the default language for > LaTeX, but not for CJK-LaTeX. I believe it is the same (american english) when using CJK.sty (or what did you mean by CJK-LaTeX?). Dou you have a documentation pointer? > Besides this, there are

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

On 2012-07-08, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All other languages do

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

On 2012-07-08, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: >> Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, >> english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX >> command (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All >> other

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 03.07.2012 20:22, schrieb Georg Baum: I tested my commits as best as I could do. I also committed testfiles and updated existing ones. The new files cannot be exported by LyX again, so they do not show that much. I don't understand. I can import

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2012 um 21:11:14, schrieb Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de Uwe Stöhr wrote: ... Question: Is it more convenient to let the test overwrite the reference results, so that the differences are automatically seen by git, or should the references better be kept in a

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 08.07.2012 21:11, schrieb Georg Baum: I don't understand. I can import XeTeX-polyglossia.tex and then re-export it. Attached is the original file and the re-exported file. Diffing them you see that everything is in place and nothing is lost. Indeed. In case of XeTeX-polyglossia.tex there

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 08.07.2012 21:11, schrieb Georg Baum: but CJK.lyx cannot be exported. I can export it without problems to pdflatex. Does not work either. It fails to encode 0x6587 in both cases. I also don't understand the note in CJK.lyx.lyx. The .tex file clearly states that the

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All other languages do not appear explicitly in the

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 03.07.2012 20:22, schrieb Georg Baum: > >>> I tested my commits as best as I could do. I also committed testfiles >>> and updated existing ones. >> >> The new files cannot be exported by LyX again, so they do not show that >> much. > > I don't understand. I can import

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2012 um 21:11:14, schrieb Georg Baum > Uwe Stöhr wrote: ... > Question: Is it more convenient to let the test overwrite the reference > results, so that the differences are automatically seen by git, or should > the references better be kept

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 08.07.2012 21:11, schrieb Georg Baum: I don't understand. I can import XeTeX-polyglossia.tex and then re-export it. Attached is the original file and the re-exported file. Diffing them you see that everything is in place and nothing is lost. Indeed. In case of XeTeX-polyglossia.tex there

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.07.2012 21:11, schrieb Georg Baum: > >> but CJK.lyx cannot be exported. > > I can export it without problems to pdflatex. Does not work either. It fails to encode 0x6587 in both cases. >> I also don't understand >> the note in CJK.lyx.lyx. The .tex file clearly states

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 08.07.2012 22:18, schrieb Georg Baum: Please forget about LyX for a moment. As far as LaTeX is concerned, english is the only language that explicitly appears in a LaTeX command (or rather the preamble in this case) in this document. All other languages do not appear explicitly in the

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2012 um 00:03:14, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de Am 05.07.2012 11:02, schrieb Kornel Benko: But I still have not understood why it compiled as merged build Uwe, das ist wirklich einfach. Angenommen 2 Dateien a.cpp ... int a; // declaration

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2012 um 00:03:14, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 05.07.2012 11:02, schrieb Kornel Benko: > > >> But I still have not understood why it compiled as merged build > > > > Uwe, das ist wirklich einfach. > > Angenommen 2 Dateien > > > > a.cpp > > ... > > int a;

Re: [patch] fix bug 8230 - was: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Le 04/07/2012 23:52, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 03.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Ah, I tried to output as char and that failed. I'll try now with string and propose a patch. Attached is the patch for bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8230 I tested it with all sorts of verbatim that I could

Re: [patch] fix bug 8230 - was: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Le 05/07/2012 10:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : I tested it with all sorts of verbatim that I could imagine and also with single '\' as \verb argument. One thing that chould be done[...] Sorry for the unreadable message. I put a better version at

Re: [patch] fix bug 8230 - was: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Le 04/07/2012 23:52, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 03.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Ah, I tried to output as char and that failed. I'll try now with string and propose a patch. Attached is the patch for bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8230 I tested it with all sorts of verbatim that I could

Re: [patch] fix bug 8230 - was: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Le 05/07/2012 10:20, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : I tested it with all sorts of verbatim that I could imagine and also with single '\' as \verb argument. One thing that chould be done[...] Sorry for the unreadable message. I put a better version at

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 02.07.2012 22:57, schrieb Kornel Benko: The compilation with merged files seemed to be faster on windows. Since then he (Peter) is developing a new generator for cmake called ninja. This one will be (on windows again) really fast compared to I'm already using Ninja and this is indeed much

[patch] fix bug 8230 - was: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 03.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Ah, I tried to output as char and that failed. I'll try now with string and propose a patch. Attached is the patch for bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8230 I tested it with all sorts of verbatim that I could imagine and also with single '\' as

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 02.07.2012 22:57, schrieb Kornel Benko: The compilation with merged files seemed to be faster on windows. Since then he (Peter) is developing a new generator for cmake called "ninja". This one will be (on windows again) really fast compared to I'm already using Ninja and this is indeed

[patch] fix bug 8230 - was: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 03.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Ah, I tried to output as char and that failed. I'll try now with string and propose a patch. Attached is the patch for bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8230 I tested it with all sorts of verbatim that I could imagine and also with single '\' as

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Well, Georg, on the other hand, please realize that Uwe is currently the only person actively working on tex2lyx, and he really tries hard to get things on par. Not everyone has the same coding skills (I certainly count myself to the lower rank of the scale), and

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: I missed that. But I already sent you a private mail. Maybe this was also lost. I only got the one you sent to the list as well. If you sent another one please resend it. but I really dislike the latest tex2lyx developments: A special quick-fix gets committed, often

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 03.07.2012 20:22, schrieb Georg Baum: I tested my commits as best as I could do. I also committed testfiles and updated existing ones. The new files cannot be exported by LyX again, so they do not show that much. I don't understand. I can import XeTeX-polyglossia.tex and then re-export

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Well, Georg, on the other hand, please realize that Uwe is currently > the only person actively working on tex2lyx, and he really tries hard > to get things on par. Not everyone has the same coding skills (I > certainly count myself to the lower rank of the scale), and

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I missed that. But I already sent you a private mail. Maybe this was also > lost. I only got the one you sent to the list as well. If you sent another one please resend it. >> but I really >> dislike the latest tex2lyx developments: A special quick-fix gets >> committed,

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 03.07.2012 20:22, schrieb Georg Baum: I tested my commits as best as I could do. I also committed testfiles and updated existing ones. The new files cannot be exported by LyX again, so they do not show that much. I don't understand. I can import XeTeX-polyglossia.tex and then re-export

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Sonntag, 1. Juli 2012 um 01:49:18, schrieb Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de Am 30.06.2012 16:39, schrieb Pavel Sanda: But he does because it is in anon. Now really. How should compiler know where to look for the variable when its not declared in your .cpp file or included headers? I

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 02.07.2012 21:27, schrieb Kornel Benko: I also don't understand this and it fails as expected in trunk but not in branch on my system However, I now committed a patch that should work. Does this compile for you? if not, I'll revert my commits from branch. thanks and regards Uwe Maybe

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef: -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0 used on branch, -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1 used in trunk. Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this. Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I want to avoid

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Montag, 2. Juli 2012 um 22:34:16, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef: -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0 used on branch, -DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1 used in trunk. Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this.

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 02.07.2012 22:34, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this. Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I want to avoid such cases in the future. If necessary I will also compile

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Sonntag, 1. Juli 2012 um 01:49:18, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 30.06.2012 16:39, schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > >> But he does because it is in anon. > > > > Now really. How should compiler know where to look for the variable > > when its not declared in your .cpp file or included

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 02.07.2012 21:27, schrieb Kornel Benko: I also don't understand this and it fails as expected in trunk but not in branch on my system However, I now committed a patch that should work. Does this compile for you? if not, I'll revert my commits from branch. thanks and regards Uwe Maybe

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef: "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0" used on branch, "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1" used in trunk. Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this. Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I want to

Re: Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am Montag, 2. Juli 2012 um 22:34:16, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > Op 2-7-2012 22:30, Uwe Stöhr schreef: > >> "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=0" used on branch, > >> "-DLYX_MERGE_FILES=1" used in trunk. > > > > > > Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why > > he

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 02.07.2012 22:34, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Yes, I do. Peter once proposed to do so. I forgot in the meantime why he preferred this. Could you tell me why the code compiled in non-merge mode and not in merge? I want to avoid such cases in the future. If necessary I will also compile

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 30.06.2012 15:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: BTW I still don't get why you have all these lists about polyglossia languages when we have all the information accessible in languages. This was needed as long as tex2lyx could produce a different file format than the

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/7/1 Georg Baum: Wrong. I can be reached, and I already answered on monday, but I really dislike the latest tex2lyx developments: A special quick-fix gets committed, often hardly tested, in at least one case even uncompilable code, and afterwards several developers react and try to improve

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 01.07.2012 20:11, schrieb Georg Baum: Because we already do the same for the babel languages. I'm not sure why we do this but think that it might be a reason of not using directly the languages file - which is the best solution indeed. I could not reach Georg but will propose a patch

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.06.2012 15:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > >> BTW I still don't get why you have all these lists about polyglossia >> languages when we have all the information accessible in languages. This was needed as long as tex2lyx could produce a different file format than the

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/7/1 Georg Baum: > Wrong. I can be reached, and I already answered on monday, but I really > dislike the latest tex2lyx developments: A special quick-fix gets committed, > often hardly tested, in at least one case even uncompilable code, and > afterwards several developers react and try to

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 01.07.2012 20:11, schrieb Georg Baum: Because we already do the same for the babel languages. I'm not sure why we do this but think that it might be a reason of not using directly the languages file - which is the best solution indeed. I could not reach Georg but will propose a patch

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/6/30 Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org: The branch, 2.0.x, has been updated. - Log - commit 90d8f3adcbdf4509c7b862d34b71302c21ea56c4 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date:   Sat Jun 30 02:18:18 2012 +0200    polyglossia

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 10:44, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch make[5]: Entering directory `/home/jspitzm/lyx/lyx-stable/src/tex2lyx' CXXtext.o text.cpp: In function ‘void lyx::{anonymous}::parse_environment(lyx::Parser, std::ostream, bool,

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/6/30 Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org: I cannot reproduce this. polyglossia_languages is defined in Preamble.cpp and correctly recognizes here. I don't get a compiler warning, also not with a fresh compilation. The testcase file is correctly imported. Note that it is recognized in text.cpp

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: text.cpp: In function ?void lyx::{anonymous}::parse_environment(lyx::Parser, std::ostream, bool, std::string, lyx::Context)?: text.cpp:1192:26: error: ?polyglossia_languages? was not declared in this scope I cannot reproduce this. polyglossia_languages is defined in

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 15:37, schrieb Pavel Sanda: I don't have any clue why it is not compilable for you. Can anybody else compile? I don't have clue how this was ever supposed to work. You declaredefine polyglossia_languages in Preamble.cpp and use it in text.cpp. There is no way how is compiler can

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 15:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Note that it is recognized in text.cpp within the anon namespace, but not outside (where this error occurs, in parse_text). So I suppose it is not correctly defined (with the appropriate scope). I still don't get it to work in another solution

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 30.06.2012 15:37, schrieb Pavel Sanda: I don't have any clue why it is not compilable for you. Can anybody else compile? I don't have clue how this was ever supposed to work. You declaredefine polyglossia_languages in Preamble.cpp and use it in text.cpp. There is no

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/6/30 Uwe Stöhr: I still don't get it to work in another solution than what I committed. I'll now work on to define the list in a header. Can you please revert your commit for the time being, so that we can compile branch again? Thanks, Jürgen

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 16:39, schrieb Pavel Sanda: But he does because it is in anon. Now really. How should compiler know where to look for the variable when its not declared in your .cpp file or included headers? I also don't understand this and it fails as expected in trunk but not in branch on

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 22:58, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I still don't get it to work in another solution than what I committed. I'll now work on to define the list in a header. Can you please revert your commit for the time being, so that we can compile branch again? I committed a solution that

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/6/30 Uwe Stöhr : > The branch, 2.0.x, has been updated. > > - Log - > > commit 90d8f3adcbdf4509c7b862d34b71302c21ea56c4 > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date:   Sat Jun 30 02:18:18 2012 +0200 > >    

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 10:44, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch make[5]: Entering directory `/home/jspitzm/lyx/lyx-stable/src/tex2lyx' CXXtext.o text.cpp: In function ‘void lyx::{anonymous}::parse_environment(lyx::Parser&, std::ostream&, bool,

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/6/30 Uwe Stöhr : > I cannot reproduce this. polyglossia_languages is defined in Preamble.cpp > and correctly recognizes here. I don't get a compiler warning, also not with > a fresh compilation. The testcase file is correctly imported. Note that it is recognized in

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> text.cpp: In function ?void >> lyx::{anonymous}::parse_environment(lyx::Parser&, std::ostream&, bool, >> std::string&, lyx::Context&)?: >> text.cpp:1192:26: error: ?polyglossia_languages? was not declared in this >> scope > > I cannot reproduce this. polyglossia_languages is

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 15:37, schrieb Pavel Sanda: I don't have any clue why it is not compilable for you. Can anybody else compile? I don't have clue how this was ever supposed to work. You declare polyglossia_languages in Preamble.cpp and use it in text.cpp. There is no way how is compiler can find

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 15:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Note that it is recognized in text.cpp within the anon namespace, but not outside (where this error occurs, in parse_text). So I suppose it is not correctly defined (with the appropriate scope). I still don't get it to work in another solution

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.06.2012 15:37, schrieb Pavel Sanda: > >>> I don't have any clue why it is not compilable for you. Can anybody else >>> compile? >> >> I don't have clue how this was ever supposed to work. >> You declare polyglossia_languages in Preamble.cpp and use it in >> text.cpp. >>

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

2012/6/30 Uwe Stöhr: > I still don't get it to work in another solution than what I committed. I'll > now work on to define the list in a header. Can you please revert your commit for the time being, so that we can compile branch again? Thanks, Jürgen

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 16:39, schrieb Pavel Sanda: But he does because it is in anon. Now really. How should compiler know where to look for the variable when its not declared in your .cpp file or included headers? I also don't understand this and it fails as expected in trunk but not in branch on

Re: [LyX 2.0.x] polyglossia tex2lyx support also for branch

Am 30.06.2012 22:58, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I still don't get it to work in another solution than what I committed. I'll now work on to define the list in a header. Can you please revert your commit for the time being, so that we can compile branch again? I committed a solution that