Am Sonntag, dem 28.02.2021 um 15:28 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Ctrl-F actually toggles.
>
> It was toggling, but apparently not anymore with latest master.
No, I have been pushed (and convinced) to remove that. But Esc works
(as in the other dock widgets)
Jürgen
signature.asc
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:23:52PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 15:09 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Thanks. Another glitch is the fact that the search dialog can only be
> > dismissed by the X-close button (the toolbar button does not toggle).
> > However,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 03:00:38PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 16.02.2021 um 14:50 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Misunderstanding. It seemed I am pushing my agenda too far without
> > anyone much interested in this direction.
> > Do you want me to revert to original
Am Dienstag, dem 16.02.2021 um 14:50 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Misunderstanding. It seemed I am pushing my agenda too far without
> anyone much interested in this direction.
> Do you want me to revert to original version or the command-sequence
> improvement?
I prefer to have to original
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 16.02.2021 um 13:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > I see. I reverted the CTRL+F3 binding and will keep the changes for
> > F3 privately.
>
> But why did you revert the binding? I think I want it as well.
Am Dienstag, dem 16.02.2021 um 13:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> I see. I reverted the CTRL+F3 binding and will keep the changes for
> F3 privately.
But why did you revert the binding? I think I want it as well.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 02:13:45PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 13:10 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Thinking aloud, it might not be even necessary to have new shortcut at all.
> >
> > What if we enhanced current word-find so that it always uses currently
> >
Am Dienstag, dem 16.02.2021 um 08:53 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Strange, fixed now. Pavel
I misread. I though "enter something with the numpad (e.g., numbers)",
not "using the enter key".
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 07:34:27AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Next weird issue - enter on my numeric keypad stopped to work with
> > the new
> > UI. Can you reproduce?
>
> No.
Strange, fixed now. Pavel
--
lyx-devel
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 21:51 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Next weird issue - enter on my numeric keypad stopped to work with
> the new
> UI. Can you reproduce?
No.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:46:23AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes
> > backward.
>
> Should be fixed.
>
> Please verify.
It works now, thanks.
Next weird
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:48:04AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 19:39 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Not sure how to change themes.
>
> E.g., "lyx -style fusion"
That's a helpful feature to know about.
> > I can look into that. I can also test
> > on a
On 2/15/21 9:16 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> 2/ when the dialog "would you like to start from start" is shown, the
>> focus is not in the dock anymore and it not possible to use Enter to
>> search next.
> I just learned
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 15:09 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Thanks. Another glitch is the fact that the search dialog can only be
> dismissed by the X-close button (the toolbar button does not toggle).
> However, when the dialog is minimized, the close button is not
> available and one
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> 2/ when the dialog "would you like to start from start" is shown, the
> focus is not in the dock anymore and it not possible to use Enter to
> search next.
I just learned that we have a 10 year old ticket to this:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:13 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > There's something strange on Windows, too. I see 2 Find and 2 Replace
> > perfectly equal buttons. See attached.
>
> This (and Scott's and Pavel's woes)
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 13:10 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Thinking aloud, it might not be even necessary to have new shortcut
> at all.
>
> What if we enhanced current word-find so that it always uses
> currently selected
> text for the search?
> Then F3 would by default use GuiSearch
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 11:49 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Not that bad ;) A problem though:
>
> + if (instant)
> + // re-query current match
> + dispatch(FuncRequest(LFUN_WORD_BACKWARD));
>
> The search string is not necessarily a word. Instead of
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 13:00 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Oops, I clearly misunderstood the Big Mac Way ;)
> What I thought as cool is in current state of affairs "command-
> sequence search-string-set; word-find".
> Would you mind if I changed CTRL+F3 in cua bind to this?
No. This differs
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 12:45 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Don't know if intended, I still see the dialog even if performed by
> GuiSearch and wrap is off.
Yes, that's intended. Give the user a signal that end/begin has been
reached.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:00:48PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:11:23AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > > Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes
> > > backward.
> >
> >
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:11:23AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes
> > backward.
>
> This looks like an (unintended?) consequence of Stephan's work: word-
>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:09 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Maybe we could ditch this dialog and have check box whether to loop
> > from begining?
>
> Done. We still have the dialog for searches not performed by
Le 15/02/2021 à 09:20, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Maybe we could ditch this dialog and have check box whether to loop
from begining?
I agree. In that case, however, we should make search stop after one
cycle.
The emacs way is to flash the screen (invert briefly?) and/or beep and
continue
Le 15/02/2021 à 10:55, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 23:40 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
'find as you type'.
Proof of concept (as I understood it) in master. Please check.
Not that bad ;) A problem though:
+ if (instant)
+ // re-query
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:09 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Maybe we could ditch this dialog and have check box whether to loop
> from begining?
Done. We still have the dialog for searches not performed by GuiSearch.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 23:40 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> 'find as you type'.
Proof of concept (as I understood it) in master. Please check.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> 2/ when the dialog "would you like to start from start" is shown, the
> focus is not in the dock anymore and it not possible to use Enter to
> search next.
Question back to you: Can we prevent the workarea to take focus
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 10:25 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Yes. Backward search is alike, but with Ctrl-R.
But I don't see how we can have both (without having back the direction
shortcut we just so eagerly ditched).
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Am Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:09:17 +0100
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:59 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > What's that? Perform search while you edit the search string?
> >
> > Yes, like emacs does with Ctrl-S.
>
> And this always searches forward, right?
>
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 10:09 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:59 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
> Lasgouttes:
> > What's that? Perform search while you edit the search string?
> >
> > Yes, like emacs does with Ctrl-S.
>
> And this always searches forward,
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 10:08 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Do you think we should have both patches?
>
> I think so, because then the LFUN_WORD_FIND doesn’t rely on internal
> defaults.
I am not sure whether it's not a feature to use the previous options.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:59 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> What's that? Perform search while you edit the search string?
>
> Yes, like emacs does with Ctrl-S.
And this always searches forward, right?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Am 15.02.2021 um 10:03 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:52 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> I don’t understand. The direction isn’t stored in
>> setSearchRequestCache().
>> The direction is stripped. Probably that causes the trouble.
>
> It turned out the problem
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:52 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> I don’t understand. The direction isn’t stored in
> setSearchRequestCache().
> The direction is stripped. Probably that causes the trouble.
It turned out the problem was the parsing of the search argument set
forward to false by
Le 15/02/2021 à 08:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 23:40 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
If now is the good time for the Christmas shopping list, then I would
like 'find as you type'.
What's that? Perform search while you edit the search string?
Yes, like
Am 15.02.2021 um 09:11 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>> Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes
>> backward.
>
> This looks like an (unintended?) consequence of Stephan's work: word-
> find now uses
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes
> backward.
Should be fixed.
Please verify.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
Am Montag, dem 15.02.2021 um 09:09 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 10:04:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > 2/ when the dialog "would you like to start from start" is shown,
> > the focus
> > is not in the dock anymore and it not possible to use Enter to
> > search
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:54 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes
> backward.
This looks like an (unintended?) consequence of Stephan's work: word-
find now uses cached search information _including_ direction.
Stephan is this
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 10:04:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 2/ when the dialog "would you like to start from start" is shown, the focus
> is not in the dock anymore and it not possible to use Enter to search next.
> Do we really need the dialog, BTW?
Maybe we could ditch this dialog
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:13 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> There's something strange on Windows, too. I see 2 Find and 2 Replace
> perfectly equal buttons. See attached.
This (and Scott's and Pavel's woes) should be fixed now.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 23:40 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> If now is the good time for the Christmas shopping list, then I would
> like 'find as you type'.
What's that? Perform search while you edit the search string?
Jürgen
>
> JMarc
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 22:13 +0100 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> There's something strange on Windows, too. I see 2 Find and 2 Replace
> perfectly equal buttons. See attached.
Hm, maybe we just forget about the icons and use plain old < >.
Strange Qt still does not get this right in 2021.
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 21:33 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons (see attached preview how
> they look on my screen) this is really nice piece of work :)
Is this Qt theme dependent?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 19:39 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Not sure how to change themes.
E.g., "lyx -style fusion"
> I can look into that. I can also test
> on a newer Qt version when I have time.
Thanks. Apparently Pavel has the same issue.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description:
Am 14.02.2021 um 22:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons (see attached preview how they
>> look on my screen) this is really nice piece of work :)
>
> Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 06:32:35PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 12:20 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Good points. From an interface perspective, I like the idea of
> > getting rid of the non-advanced find "replace". I agree the
> > implementation in advanced
On 2/14/21 4:54 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons (see attached preview how they
look on my screen) this is really nice piece of work :)
Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area
Le 14/02/2021 à 22:54, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons (see attached preview how they
look on my screen) this is really nice piece of work :)
Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons (see attached preview how they
> look on my screen) this is really nice piece of work :)
Another glitch: F3 in search pane goes forward, F3 in edit area goes backward.
If I understand
Am 14.02.2021 um 22:04 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 14/02/2021 à 21:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> I'm impressed, you really made it into one line -- I remember the struggle
>> with View source pane vertical size which we never really solved.
>> Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 06:32:35PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 12:20 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I just tested current master. There is a strange issue with one of
> > the buttons. Screenshot attached.
>
> Strange. So the RightToLeft layout direction
Le 14/02/2021 à 21:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
I'm impressed, you really made it into one line -- I remember the struggle
with View source pane vertical size which we never really solved.
Apart from some UI glitch with two buttons (see attached preview how they
look on my screen) this is really
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 12:48:04PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 2/14/21 12:13 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:54 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> >> I banged my head against it a while ago. Stack Exchange to the rescue this
> >> time.
> > I
On 2/14/21 12:13 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:54 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
> Heck:
>> I banged my head against it a while ago. Stack Exchange to the rescue
>> this time.
> I figured a frame (rather than a GroupBox) is more suitable as it takes
> less space
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 12:20 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Good points. From an interface perspective, I like the idea of
> getting rid of the non-advanced find "replace". I agree the
> implementation in advanced find is a big step backward for simple
> find/replace, but I think this
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:14 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
> Heck:
> > > I am completely opposed to this. I use Advanced F only when I
> > > have to
> > > and use simple replace a lot.
> >
> > I think Advanced is quite
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:54 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> I banged my head against it a while ago. Stack Exchange to the rescue
> this time.
I figured a frame (rather than a GroupBox) is more suitable as it takes
less space (if shown).
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This
On 2/14/21 11:50 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:41 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
> Heck:
>> I have seen this problem before and never quite figured out what to
>> do.
>> I think I fixed it this time. The problem is that the horizontal
>> layout that had the check
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:41 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> I have seen this problem before and never quite figured out what to
> do.
> I think I fixed it this time. The problem is that the horizontal
> layout that had the check boxes is still there, even though they are
> hidden.
On 2/14/21 11:19 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 08:43 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 20:35 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>> I do replace once a month while find 5xtimes a day, so the extra
>>> click for replace does not really hurt.
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 11:14 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> > I am completely opposed to this. I use Advanced F only when I
> > have to
> > and use simple replace a lot.
>
> I think Advanced is quite a bit slower, too.
Yes, it is slower, and it is generally more clumsy. Advanced
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 08:43 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 20:35 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > I do replace once a month while find 5xtimes a day, so the extra
> > click for replace does not really hurt.
>
> ... does not really hurt _you_.
>
> Anyway I
On 2/14/21 2:42 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 16:48 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>> What if we get rid of the non-advanced replace? That is, if users
>> want so use replace, they need to go to Edit > Find & Replace
>> (Advanced).
> I am completely opposed to this.
Am Sonntag, dem 14.02.2021 um 15:46 +0200 schrieb Yuriy Skalko:
> The only minor issue for me is the button captions that differ only
> by icons. Is it possible to use something like "Find Previous" "Find
> Next"
This gets too long, particularly since "Replace" would need to be
"Replace and Find
Dear all
I have a patch ready that moves the simple search dialog to the bottom
dock widget (see attached screenshot).
This solves some long standing UI issues:
* https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
* https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8054
Most importantly, search is more convenient when using
On 14/02/2021 8:42 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 16:48 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
What if we get rid of the non-advanced replace? That is, if users
want so use replace, they need to go to Edit > Find & Replace
(Advanced).
I am completely opposed to this. I use
Am 13.02.2021 um 14:31 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Dear all
>
> I have a patch ready that moves the simple search dialog to the bottom
> dock widget (see attached screenshot).
>
> This solves some long standing UI issues:
>
> * https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
> *
Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 20:35 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> I do replace once a month while find 5xtimes a day, so the extra
> click for replace does not really hurt.
... does not really hurt _you_.
Anyway I am working on something.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 16:48 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> What if we get rid of the non-advanced replace? That is, if users
> want so use replace, they need to go to Edit > Find & Replace
> (Advanced).
I am completely opposed to this. I use Advanced F only when I have to
and use simple
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 08:35:27PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 17:19 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > > The hope of the switching to bar was to minimize space in a way like
> > > firefox does, i.e.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 17:19 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > The hope of the switching to bar was to minimize space in a way like
> > firefox does, i.e. basically one-liner.
>
> Firefox only has find, not replace.
>
> >
Am Samstag, dem 13.02.2021 um 17:19 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> The hope of the switching to bar was to minimize space in a way like
> firefox does, i.e. basically one-liner.
Firefox only has find, not replace.
> So any switch which would collapse this dialog
> into way smaller beast would be
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 02:31:43PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> This solves some long standing UI issues:
>
> * https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
> * https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8054
>
> Most importantly, search is more convenient when using the keyboard
> (Ctrl-F toggles the search
On 2/13/21 8:49 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:31:43 +0100
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> I have a patch ready that moves the simple search dialog to the bottom
>> dock widget (see attached screenshot).
>>
>> This solves some long standing UI issues:
>>
>> *
Am Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:31:43 +0100
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Dear all
>
> I have a patch ready that moves the simple search dialog to the bottom
> dock widget (see attached screenshot).
>
> This solves some long standing UI issues:
>
> * https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
> *
77 matches
Mail list logo
