Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Anders Ekberg a...@mac.com writes: Could something like this work? I am a bit in a hurry, but a few comments on this: + ./configure --prefix=/Path/to/LyX.app --disable-concept-checks --with-version-suffix=-2.0 --with-qt4-dir=/Path/to/QT4/ --enable-optimization=-Os --without-x

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Anders Ekberg writes: > Could something like this work? I am a bit in a hurry, but a few comments on this: + ./configure --prefix=/Path/to/LyX.app --disable-concept-checks --with-version-suffix=-2.0 --with-qt4-dir=/Path/to/QT4/ --enable-optimization=-Os --without-x

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-20 Thread BH
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Anders Ekberg wrote: (most notably --enable-optimization=-O2  --disable-debug are good for non debuging purposes). pavel Could something like this work? looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os part. firstly O2 is

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-20 Thread BH
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Anders Ekberg wrote: >>> (most notably --enable-optimization=-O2  --disable-debug >>> are good for non debuging purposes). >>> >>> pavel >> >> Could something like this work? > > looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-19 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 okt 2009, at 21.10, Pavel Sanda wrote: Anders Ekberg wrote: could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ? perhaps adding some senction would be enough. pavel Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know C++-compiling so I

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-19 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: (most notably --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug are good for non debuging purposes). pavel Could something like this work? looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os part. firstly O2 is better imho, secondly you already request O2 by calling

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-19 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 okt 2009, at 21.10, Pavel Sanda wrote: Anders Ekberg wrote: could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ? perhaps adding some senction would be enough. pavel Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know C++-compiling so I

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-19 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: >> (most notably --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug >> are good for non debuging purposes). >> >> pavel > > Could something like this work? looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os part. firstly O2 is better imho, secondly you already request O2 by calling

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think. Note however that they are intel only. The crash bug at backup is still there, but deselecting the choice of backup

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 okt 2009, at 19.40, Pavel Sanda wrote: Anders Ekberg wrote: So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think. Note however that they are intel only. The crash bug at backup is still

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ? perhaps adding some senction would be enough. pavel Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know C++-compiling so I don't put in too many unnecessary flags. On the

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: > So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions > were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think. > Note however that they are intel only. The "crash bug" at backup is still > there, but deselecting the choice of

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Anders Ekberg
On 18 okt 2009, at 19.40, Pavel Sanda wrote: Anders Ekberg wrote: So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think. Note however that they are intel only. The "crash bug" at backup is

Re: Compiling on Mac OSX 10.6 (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-18 Thread Pavel Sanda
Anders Ekberg wrote: >> could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ? >> perhaps adding some senction would be enough. >> >> pavel > > > Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know > C++-compiling so I don't put in too many unnecessary flags.