Anders Ekberg a...@mac.com writes:
Could something like this work?
I am a bit in a hurry, but a few comments on this:
+ ./configure --prefix=/Path/to/LyX.app --disable-concept-checks
--with-version-suffix=-2.0 --with-qt4-dir=/Path/to/QT4/
--enable-optimization=-Os --without-x
Anders Ekberg writes:
> Could something like this work?
I am a bit in a hurry, but a few comments on this:
+ ./configure --prefix=/Path/to/LyX.app --disable-concept-checks
--with-version-suffix=-2.0 --with-qt4-dir=/Path/to/QT4/
--enable-optimization=-Os --without-x
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Anders Ekberg wrote:
(most notably --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug
are good for non debuging purposes).
pavel
Could something like this work?
looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os part. firstly O2 is
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Anders Ekberg wrote:
>>> (most notably --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug
>>> are good for non debuging purposes).
>>>
>>> pavel
>>
>> Could something like this work?
>
> looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os
On 18 okt 2009, at 21.10, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Anders Ekberg wrote:
could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using
10.6 ?
perhaps adding some senction would be enough.
pavel
Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who
actually know
C++-compiling so I
Anders Ekberg wrote:
(most notably --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug
are good for non debuging purposes).
pavel
Could something like this work?
looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os part. firstly O2 is better
imho, secondly you already request O2 by calling
On 18 okt 2009, at 21.10, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Anders Ekberg wrote:
could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using
10.6 ?
perhaps adding some senction would be enough.
pavel
Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who
actually know
C++-compiling so I
Anders Ekberg wrote:
>> (most notably --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-debug
>> are good for non debuging purposes).
>>
>> pavel
>
> Could something like this work?
looks good, except the --enable-optimization=-Os part. firstly O2 is better
imho, secondly you already request O2 by calling
Anders Ekberg wrote:
So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions
were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think.
Note however that they are intel only. The crash bug at backup is still
there, but deselecting the choice of backup
On 18 okt 2009, at 19.40, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Anders Ekberg wrote:
So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation
instructions
were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX
I think.
Note however that they are intel only. The crash bug at backup is
still
Anders Ekberg wrote:
could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ?
perhaps adding some senction would be enough.
pavel
Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know
C++-compiling so I don't put in too many unnecessary flags. On the
Anders Ekberg wrote:
> So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation instructions
> were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX I think.
> Note however that they are intel only. The "crash bug" at backup is still
> there, but deselecting the choice of
On 18 okt 2009, at 19.40, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Anders Ekberg wrote:
So now both 1.6 and 2.0 run like a charm. The same compilation
instructions
were used for both. This bodes well for future Qt upgrades for LyX
I think.
Note however that they are intel only. The "crash bug" at backup is
Anders Ekberg wrote:
>> could you prepare diff against INSTALL.MacOSX for people using 10.6 ?
>> perhaps adding some senction would be enough.
>>
>> pavel
>
>
> Sure, I just thought I should get some input from people who actually know
> C++-compiling so I don't put in too many unnecessary flags.
14 matches
Mail list logo