Uwe Stöhr writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>
>> What I can do right now, until I have a proper way to check for R, is to
>> remove the condition on Sweave.sty. Would that seem better to you for
>> now?
>
> Yes.
I'll do that for branch (after 1.6.3), but I have a good solution for
trunk (s
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
What I can do right now, until I have a proper way to check for R, is to
remove the condition on Sweave.sty. Would that seem better to you for
now?
Yes.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> This hack is indeed a bit unusual but will work, and this way the
> license of the used files is at least clear. But how do you check for
> R? Currently we search for Sweave.sty via chkconfig.ltx which is not
> sensible in my opinion.
What I can do right now, until I have a pr
> Yes, but the right solution is to test for R itself. When Sweave.sty is in a
place where LaTeX
> does not search, the Sweave R function actually outputs
> \usepackage{/path/to/Sweave.sty}
> which is kind of ugly but does the trick. This is transparent for us, since
we do not add the
> \usepac
I know that you are knowing what you do. I was perhaps a bit over-
eager because I send this mail before I received your first mail.
But I think it doesn't harm that I contacted him. He can reject my
proposal or give a statement, or add the license and author info to
sweave.sty. I'm curious ab
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave.
I would have preferred you to wait for that, if only to hear my thoughts
on the subject. While you are free to disagree with me, you could have least
have assumed that I know what I am doing...
I k
Le 19 mai 09 à 18:48, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
JMarc, can you please ask Gregor to get active so that sweave.sty
is available at CTAN? Please CC me to this mail.
OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave.
I would have preferred you to wait for that, if onl
Le 19 mai 09 à 19:08, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
The problem is that we look only for the file Sweave.sty. but LaTeX
won't find it, because it is not available at CTAN. So even when you
have R installed. it won't be found.
Yes, but the right solution is to test for R itself. When Sweave.sty
is in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The
problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN or at a trustable
official webpage.
Sweave.sty is part of R, which is probably considered as more trustable
than LyX itself by many.
The proble
Le 19 mai 09 à 18:28, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734
and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4?
No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The
problem is that sweave.sty is not available at CTAN or at a
trustabl
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
JMarc, can you please ask Gregor to get active so that sweave.sty is
available at CTAN? Please CC me to this mail.
OK, I send now an email to Prof. Leisch, the author of Sweave.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734
> and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4?
No objections from me.
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
can this http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29734
and the sweave.module file go into LyX 1.6.4?
No it cannot and should have also not be committed to trunk. The problem is that sweave.sty is not
available at CTAN or at a trustable official webpage.
http://svn.r-project.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
