On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:53:43PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:38:32AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > > > 3.0.4
> >
> > Still doesn't work (same error).
>
> Well I'm lost :
Me too.
>
> http://doc.trolltech.com/3.0/qwidget.html#setMinimumSize
>
> Can you check your
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:38:32AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > 3.0.4
>
> Still doesn't work (same error).
Well I'm lost :
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.0/qwidget.html#setMinimumSize
Can you check your headers do actually have this ?
regards
john
--
"Of all manifestations of power, restrain
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:56:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > > What Qt version please ?
> >
> > 3.0.4
>
> can you try #include please ?
Still doesn't work (same error).
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:09:11PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > QCommandBuffer.C:56: no matching function for call to
>`QCommandBuffer::setMinimumSize (QSize)'
> > > /usr/include/qt/qtoolbar.h:86: candidates are: void
>QToolBar::setMinimumSize(int, int)
> >
> > What Qt version please ?
>
>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:03:59PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:40:14PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > QCommandBuffer.C:56: no matching function for call to
>`QCommandBuffer::setMinimumSize (QSize)'
> > /usr/include/qt/qtoolbar.h:86: candidates are: void QToolBar::setMin
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:40:14PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> QCommandBuffer.C:56: no matching function for call to
>`QCommandBuffer::setMinimumSize (QSize)'
> /usr/include/qt/qtoolbar.h:86: candidates are: void QToolBar::setMinimumSize(int,
>int)
What Qt version please ?
We can probably remo
On Thursday 04 July 2002 1:36 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Ok... and where is xformsGImage in the xforms dir?
> >
> > Renamed as xformsImage ;-)
>
> So the qt2//Makefile.am neeed fixing?
That's right. Feel free.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ok... and where is xformsGImage in the xforms dir?
>
> Renamed as xformsImage ;-)
So the qt2//Makefile.am neeed fixing?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they de
On Thursday 04 July 2002 1:26 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:04:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Closer inspection of that Makefile.am will reveal that it generates those
> > .[Ch] files by linking against those in the xforms dir.
>
> Ok... and where is xformsGImage in t
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:04:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Closer inspection of that Makefile.am will reveal that it generates those
> .[Ch] files by linking against those in the xforms dir.
Ok... and where is xformsGImage in the xforms dir?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
On Thursday 04 July 2002 1:01 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The directory frontends/qt2/xforms does not contain any .C/.h but has a
> Makefile.am which seem to require some source files.
>
> Or to ask a real question: How do I compile the qt2 frontend apart from
> running ./configure --with-frontend
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> it adds all the latex-munging power of $EDITOR.
Edwin> You mean syntax highlighting? For 2 lines? Really, what's
Edwin> next?: "Edit..." buttons on the ERT insets so that we can get
Edwin> all the latex-munging power of $EDITOR? "Edit..
> I don't care much. It's a tiny amount of code.
I'll rip it then if no one objects...
Ed.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:30:55PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> You mean syntax highlighting? For 2 lines? Really, what's next?: "Edit..."
People have pre ambles longer than two lines.
> buttons on the ERT insets so that we can get all the latex-munging power of
> $EDITOR? "Edit..." buttons i
> it adds all the latex-munging power of $EDITOR.
You mean syntax highlighting? For 2 lines? Really, what's next?: "Edit..."
buttons on the ERT insets so that we can get all the latex-munging power of
$EDITOR? "Edit..." buttons in the graphics insets so that we can get all the
graphics munging
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:09:02PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Because it doesn't add anything but clutter? Applying Ockham's razor to the
> UI: Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate...
it adds all the latex-munging power of $EDITOR.
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about e
> I've already fixed this bit of code, why remove it ?
Because it doesn't add anything but clutter? Applying Ockham's razor to the
UI: Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate...
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:28:37PM +, John Levon wrote:
> the build is still messed up after Lars changes. I have to figure out
> how to get qt2 building sensibly, probably quite painful
In fact Lars I'd appreciate some help. Currently you depend on
xforms/*.lo. Now I how to I get to automat
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> anyone?
the build is still messed up after Lars changes. I have to figure out
how to get qt2 building sensibly, probably quite painful
> ps. This one's probably for John: does anyone mind if I remove the edit...
> button from the
> > Try touching all the .C files in the frontends dir (only 4 or 5 files).
It was a clean compile...
> > possible that they think that their pimpl_s are qt2 ones, whilst your
> > executable contains xforms ones. Why it has linked as it has is another
> > matter about which I cannot comment.
>
>
On Friday 01 March 2002 12:29 pm, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Friday 01 March 2002 12:21 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > I am trying to make the qt2 frontend compile and added a method running()
> in
> > qt2/Timeout_pimpl
> >
> > there are two issues
> >
> > 1. Everything compiles but the dialogs ar
On Friday 01 March 2002 12:21 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> I am trying to make the qt2 frontend compile and added a method running()
in
> qt2/Timeout_pimpl
>
> there are two issues
>
> 1. Everything compiles but the dialogs are all xforms!
> 2. Starting and closing lyx makes it crash:
>
> #0 0x
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:31:22AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> > lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught
>
>
> are you running with lyx -sync ?
>
> You must for qt2 right now.
>
> if not, please obtain a backtrace for me
both, with or without -sync causes the SIGSEGV.
Here is my g
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:31:22AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught
are you running with lyx -sync ?
You must for qt2 right now.
if not, please obtain a backtrace for me
regards
john
--
"We don't have to worry about single players such as Michael Owen or Emile
Heskey.
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:31:50PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> John,
>
> Could the attached patch solve the problem to at least compile the present qt2 parts?
> (It does on my FreeBSD PC).
> Rob.
looks sane to me. Add a changelog for both bits and get someone else to apply it as I
can't
thanks
John,
Could the attached patch solve the problem to at least compile the present qt2 parts?
(It does on my FreeBSD PC).
Rob.
>John Levon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:42:38PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> > All qt stuff is in config/qt2.m4.
> > I removed the symlink (mentioned above),
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:42:38PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> All qt stuff is in config/qt2.m4.
> I removed the symlink (mentioned above), but replaced all "-lqt" by "-lqt2" in
> config/qt.m4. My make then runs like a charm, linking -lqt2.
/me looks
/me is greatly surprised.
wow, that's totally
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 14:42, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > sure they need doing ;) They need to be MVCed first though and that
definitely won't
> > happen before 1.2.0.
>
> MVCed? Is gooblediegook to me. What does it mean?
MVC: model-view-control
The FormPreferences class needs to be split into
John Levon wrote:
> > 1) At the end of the make, it automagically links against -lqt, which it
> >cannot find on my FreeBSD machine, since it should be -lqt2. Of course
> >I solved it by making a symbolic link between libqt2.so and libqt.so.
>
> it does *what* ??? eh ??? This makes no se
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:06:07PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> 1) At the end of the make, it automagically links against -lqt, which it
>cannot find on my FreeBSD machine, since it should be -lqt2. Of course
>I solved it by making a symbolic link between libqt2.so and libqt.so.
it does *wh
John Levon wrote:
> sp_base.h should include I guess.
Yep, that fixes it.
A few more remarks:
1) At the end of the make, it automagically links against -lqt, which it
cannot find on my FreeBSD machine, since it should be -lqt2. Of course
I solved it by making a symbolic link between libq
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:51:20AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> ../../../src/sp_base.h:42: syntax error before `,'
sp_base.h should include I guess.
regards
john
--
"Do you mean to tell me that "The Prince" is not the set textbook for
CS1072 Professional Issues ? What on earth do you learn in t
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2001 12:57, Allan Rae wrote:
> > Am I the only who needs to add:
> > -lXft -lXmu -lXrender -lXt -lXext -lGL -lGLU
> >
> > to the libraries for the linker in order to get almost all the
> > unknown symbols resolved?
>
> I don't
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 12:57, Allan Rae wrote:
> Am I the only who needs to add:
>-lXft -lXmu -lXrender -lXt -lXext -lGL -lGLU
>
> to the libraries for the linker in order to get almost all the
> unknown symbols resolved?
I don't need to, at least. Is that Qt 2.3 or 2.2.4?
>
> Seems wi
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached My First Patch (with some coaching from John). It adds
> paragraph/print/createtabular dialogs to the qt2 port. I hope that it's fine
> as is.
>
> Thanks, Ed.
Just as a coda to this, the list might notice that the Form*.
35 matches
Mail list logo
