Helge Hafting wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? Countinued scorrling after key-release?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Helge Hafting wrote:
>>
>>> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
What was wrong with my patch from months
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
|
| Is it my old pet? Countinued scorrling after key-release?
|
| What was wrong with my patch from months
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? Countinued scorrling after key-release?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
| >>
| >> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
| >>
| >> What was wrong with my patch
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch
Helge Hafting wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? Countinued scorrling after key-release?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch will indeed prevent scrolling
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
|
| Is it my old pet? Countinued scorrling after key-release?
|
| What was wrong with my patch from months back?
|
|
| I tried this
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
>>
>> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
>>
>> What was wrong with my patch from months back?
>>
>
> I tried this with todays svn.
> The patch will indeed
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
| >>
| >> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
| >>
| >> What was wrong with my patch from months back?
| >>
| >
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
(I hope I'm referring to the correct version of the patch:) As Helge
already reported, on very slow systems (I tested this by running under
valgrind), if you type quickly, some keystrokes get swallowed...
Nice idea to slow down with valgrind.
Sorry for the previous test of event4 - I patched the wrong tree. :-(
event4 solves the problem for pageup/pagedown! I can scroll through
half the userguide at 100% cpu, release the key, and LyX stops instantly!
This is very good.
The scrollbar still overshoots. I can only make it overshoot
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? Countinued scorrling after key-release?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch will indeed prevent scrolling after key-release,
so it fixes
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
(I hope I'm referring to the correct version of the patch:) As Helge
already reported, on very slow systems (I tested this by running under
valgrind), if you type quickly, some keystrokes get swallowed...
Nice idea to slow down with valgrind.
Sorry for the previous test of event4 - I patched the wrong tree. :-(
event4 solves the problem for pageup/pagedown! I can scroll through
half the userguide at 100% cpu, release the key, and LyX stops instantly!
This is very good.
The scrollbar still overshoots. I can only make it overshoot
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
What was wrong with my patch from months back?
I tried this with todays svn.
The patch will indeed prevent scrolling after key-release,
so it
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| The idea of the patch was to drop those events if
| the last event wasn't processed.
For mouse clicks, arrow keys, etc that is kindo ok, but for regular
chars it is not acceptable. If I press 'abc' really fast, I still
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| The idea of the patch was to drop those events if
| the last event wasn't processed.
For mouse clicks, arrow keys, etc that is kindo ok, but for regular
chars it is not acceptable. If I press 'abc' really fast, I still
Angus Leeming wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Yes, I also don't like the hardcoding. The problem is that if we start
to drop events we have to differentiate between good and bad events, and
it is hard to find a solution for all cases. So it would be better not
to drop any key. But what is the
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:57:28 José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error
that had evaded our search us before.
There are important patches that are being discussed
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
|
| | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | | Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | |
| | | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it.
Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter only page up/down keys were
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Yes, I also don't like the hardcoding. The problem is that if we start
>> to drop events we have to differentiate between good and bad events, and
>> it is hard to find a solution for all cases. So it would be better not
>> to drop any key. But what is
On Friday 25 May 2007 15:57:28 José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
> proposed a week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error
> that had evaded our search us before.
There are important patches th
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| >
| > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | |
| > | | Peter> I've reproduced
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| > | Peter> only page
Dov Feldstern wrote:
(I hope I'm referring to the correct version of the patch:) As Helge
already reported, on very slow systems (I tested this by running under
valgrind), if you type quickly, some keystrokes get swallowed...
Nice idea to slow down with valgrind.
I've reproduced the error and
Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter static const int delayed_keys = Qt::Key_PageDown |
Peter
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
| Peter (because of the implicit casts?)
|
| Peter static
This drawer patch should go in:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3500
Stefan
Am 25.05.2007 um 16:57 schrieb José Matos:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that
had
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter static const int delayed_keys =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter only page up/down keys were
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter only page up/down keys were
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| writes:
| | | | Peter == Peter Kümmel
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | | | | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| writes:
| | | | Peter == Peter Kümmel
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | | | | Peter I've
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | writes:
| | | | | Peter == Peter
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
| Peter (because of the
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter static const
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter only page up/down keys
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| writes:
| | | | Peter == Peter Kümmel
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | | | | Peter I've
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| (At the time I felt that the patch was a bit hackish, X11 only and had
| too little testing.)
Do you know QApplication::syncX, but it is maybe call to XSync with false.
I've also used XSync in the scroll event but then the scrolling behavior
was really bad.
|
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| writes:
| | | | Peter == Peter Kümmel
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Peter == Peter Kümmel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter static const int delayed_keys =
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Yes, I also don't like the hardcoding. The problem is that if we start
to drop events we have to differentiate between good and bad events, and
it is hard to find a solution for all cases. So it would be better not
to drop any key. But what is the alternative? A XSync call
Dov Feldstern wrote:
> (I hope I'm referring to the correct version of the patch:) As Helge
> already reported, on very slow systems (I tested this by running under
> valgrind), if you type quickly, some keystrokes get swallowed...
Nice idea to slow down with valgrind.
I've reproduced the error
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter> static const int delayed_keys = Qt::Key_PageDown |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
| Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
|
This drawer patch should go in:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3500
Stefan
Am 25.05.2007 um 16:57 schrieb José Matos:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that
had
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
Peter> static const int delayed_keys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter> only page
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| |
| | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
| | Peter> only page
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | | | Peter> I've reproduced the
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | | |
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| > | > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > | > writes:
| > | > | | |
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
> | Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
> |
Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
>> Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
>> Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | |
> | | Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
> | | Peter>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> | > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > writes:
> | > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
> | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > (At the time I felt that the patch was a bit hackish, X11 only and had
> | > too little testing.)
Do you know QApplication::syncX, but it is maybe call to XSync with false.
I've also used XSync in the scroll event but then the scrolling behavior
was really bad.
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>> | > | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> | > writes:
>> | > | | | > "Peter" == Peter Kümmel
>>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> I've reproduced the error and fixed it. The problem was, not
> Peter> only page up/down keys were dropped. This code does not work
> Peter> (because of the implicit casts?)
>
> Peter> static const
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Yes, I also don't like the hardcoding. The problem is that if we start
to drop events we have to differentiate between good and bad events, and
it is hard to find a solution for all cases. So it would be better not
to drop any key. But what is the alternative? A XSync call
Objections, patches to consider, etc...
Only a patch: I would like to have the next unicodesymbols patch in because this is another step to
better unicode support:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg118499.html
If this is too late for pre1 it would be nice if it can go in
Peter Kümmel wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
I still think my scrolling patch
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=117968102228177w=2
is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
with keys you will
> Objections, patches to consider, etc...
Only a patch: I would like to have the next unicodesymbols patch in because this is another step to
better unicode support:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg118499.html
If this is too late for pre1 it would be nice if it can go
Peter Kümmel wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
I still think my scrolling patch
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel=117968102228177=2
is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
with keys you will
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first
release
candidate
Am 25.05.2007 um 16:57 schrieb José Matos:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that
had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship
José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
José Hi, are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1
José I had proposed a week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to
José avoid any error that had evaded our search us before.
José We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
There is no pending (listings) patch in my tree and the fact that
shift-page down no longer crashes lyx
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first release
candidate
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first release
candidate
On Friday 25 May 2007 17:48:30 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Are we sure that the format is frozen, or will you allow further
changes?
There is no such guarantee yet. Why should we care? :-)
The premise is there for 1.5.0. :-)
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
I still think my scrolling patch
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=117968102228177w=2
is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
with keys you will see an improvment.
What are the
On Friday 25 May 2007 20:16:40 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Farsi...
I don't forget my promisses. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Friday 25 May 2007 16:08:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
On Mac (and probably other platforms, depending on the used font) the
cursor movement is broken (it skips lines). Moreover the target_x
code in Cursor is broken. I am working on a fix right now. I consider
it a bug which shouldn't
José Matos wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
I still think my scrolling patch
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-develm=117968102228177w=2
is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
with keys you will see an improvment.
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first
release
candidate
Am 25.05.2007 um 16:57 schrieb José Matos:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that
had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship
>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Hi, are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1
José> I had proposed a week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to
José> avoid any error that had evaded our search us befo
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
There is no pending (listings) patch in my tree and the fact that
shift-page down no longer crashes lyx
José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had
> proposed a
> week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
> evaded our search us before.
>
> We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we c
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first release
candidate
José Matos wrote:
Hi,
are we ready for RC1, in the goals that I have stated to RC1 I had proposed a
week between beta 3 and release candidate 1 to avoid any error that had
evaded our search us before.
We have bugs but nothing so glaring that we can not ship the first release
candidate
On Friday 25 May 2007 17:48:30 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Are we sure that the format is frozen, or will you allow further
> changes?
There is no such guarantee yet. Why should we care? :-)
The premise is there for 1.5.0. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> I still think my scrolling patch
> http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel=117968102228177=2
> is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
> with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
> with keys you will see an improvment.
What are
On Friday 25 May 2007 20:16:40 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Farsi...
I don't forget my promisses. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Friday 25 May 2007 16:08:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> On Mac (and probably other platforms, depending on the used font) the
> cursor movement is broken (it skips lines). Moreover the target_x
> code in Cursor is broken. I am working on a fix right now. I consider
> it a bug which
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 18:11:28 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> I still think my scrolling patch
>> http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel=117968102228177=2
>> is better than nothing. Try to scroll on Linux
>> with and without the patch, and at least when scrolling
>> with keys you will see an
92 matches
Mail list logo
