On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:58:20AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
The LyX source repository has now moved to subversion.
Anonaccess with svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk (for head branch)
Developer access with
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 04:53:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
Great job!!!
Indeed!
I couldn't believe how fast it was checking out the code... in fact I
fully expected the compilation to fail because some stuff was missing.
I've
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
There is one thing I wonder about the setup of Subversion though... I
remember reading something about there being a risk with several
people accessing (writing?) to the repository at the same time. I'd be
grateful for a pointer to the relevant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[On umask]
| I'm sure Lars has done all of this, he seems quite the expert. :-)
Actually I am quite ignoring the issue. This isssue is just the same
as we have had always with cvs, and since we are using the exact same
mechanism for svn the issue is already solved.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:58:20AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > The LyX source repository has now moved to subversion.
> >
> > Anonaccess with svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk (for head branch)
> >
> > Developer access with
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 04:53:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> > Great job!!!
>
> Indeed!
>
> I couldn't believe how fast it was checking out the code... in fact I
> fully expected the compilation to fail because some stuff was missing.
>
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > There is one thing I wonder about the setup of Subversion though... I
> > remember reading something about there being a risk with several
> > people accessing (writing?) to the repository at the same time. I'd be
> > grateful for a pointer to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[On umask]
| I'm sure Lars has done all of this, he seems quite the expert. :-)
Actually I am quite ignoring the issue. This isssue is just the same
as we have had always with cvs, and since we are using the exact same
mechanism for svn the issue is already solved.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
Great job!!!
Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
cvs'.
Cheers,
Bo
Can probably be done... in the SVN FAQ at
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Great job!!!
|
| Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
| Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
| cvs'.
Something like this is the plan.
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Great job!!!
|
| Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
| Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
| cvs'.
Something like this is the plan.
Excellent idea!
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Great job!!!
>
> Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
> Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
> cvs'.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
Can probably be done... in the SVN FAQ at
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Great job!!!
|
| Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
| Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
| cvs'.
Something like this is the plan.
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Great job!!!
|
| Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
| Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
| cvs'.
Something like this is the plan.
Excellent idea!
I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
but then make failed:
$ nice make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
Did the rules change somehow?
Helge Hafting
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
| I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
| but then make failed:
| $ nice make
| make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
|
| Did the rules change somehow?
No. Everything
Helge Hafting wrote:
I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
but then make failed:
$ nice make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
Did the rules change somehow?
I don't think so. It works for me (but with
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
|
| I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
| I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
| but then make failed:
| $ nice make
| make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
|
| Did the rules change
Georg Baum wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
but then make failed:
$ nice make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
Did the rules change somehow?
I don't think so. It
Great job!!!
Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
cvs'.
Cheers,
Bo
I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
but then "make" failed:
$ nice make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
Did the rules change somehow?
Helge Hafting
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
| I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
| but then "make" failed:
| $ nice make
| make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
|
| Did the rules change somehow?
No. Everything
Helge Hafting wrote:
> I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
> I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
> but then "make" failed:
> $ nice make
> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
>
> Did the rules change somehow?
I don't think so. It works for me
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
|
| > I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
| > I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
| > but then "make" failed:
| > $ nice make
| > make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
| >
| > Did the
Georg Baum wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
I installed subversion and checked out anonymously.
I ran ./autogen.sh and ./configure as usual,
but then "make" failed:
$ nice make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
Did the rules change somehow?
I don't think so.
> Great job!!!
Indeed! Would you consider adding svn version number to the about box?
Then I can report problems for cvs/revision 12345, not just 'current
cvs'.
Cheers,
Bo
The LyX source repository has now moved to subversion.
Anonaccess with svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk (for head branch)
Developer access with svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk
The repo is not opened up for commit yet, but checkouts should work
ok.
Super short quickstart for
Am Freitag, den 10.02.2006, 02:58 +0100 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
The repo is not opened up for commit yet, but checkouts should work
ok.
It is working for me - I can check out a tree and get correct diffs.
Ready to commit stuff whenever you have time to finish setting it up.
By the way,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:58:20AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
The LyX source repository has now moved to subversion.
Anonaccess with svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk (for head branch)
Developer access with svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk
Super short quickstart
The LyX source repository has now moved to subversion.
Anonaccess with svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk (for head branch)
Developer access with svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk
The repo is not opened up for commit yet, but checkouts should work
ok.
Super short quickstart for
Am Freitag, den 10.02.2006, 02:58 +0100 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> The repo is not opened up for commit yet, but checkouts should work
> ok.
It is working for me - I can check out a tree and get correct diffs.
Ready to commit stuff whenever you have time to finish setting it up.
By the way,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:58:20AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> The LyX source repository has now moved to subversion.
>
> Anonaccess with svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk (for head branch)
>
> Developer access with svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk
>
> Super short
32 matches
Mail list logo
