Le 07/05/13 06:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about this different logic instead? It relies on the size/height of
the window, not on the dock position.
No strong preference here. P
The advantage is that it also does something reasonable when the widget
is not
Le 07/05/13 06:13, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about this different logic instead? It relies on the size/height of
the window, not on the dock position.
No strong preference here. P
The advantage is that it also does something reasonable when the widget
is not
Edwin Leuven wrote:
no i use 4.8.4
in the patch i send, i used QHBoxLayout (which inherits from QBoxLayout) and
that worked fine for me?
okok :) the fact that editing .ui file in vim took me shorter time than finding
how to setup QHBoxLayout in designer suggest that i should keep
Le 05/05/13 12:01, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about this different logic instead? It relies on the size/height of
the window, not on the dock position.
No strong preference here. P
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> no i use 4.8.4
>
> in the patch i send, i used QHBoxLayout (which inherits from QBoxLayout) and
> that worked fine for me?
okok :) the fact that editing .ui file in vim took me shorter time than finding
how to setup QHBoxLayout in designer suggest that i should keep
Le 05/05/13 12:01, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What about this different logic instead? It relies on the size/height of
> the window, not on the dock position.
No strong preference here. P
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
P
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose…
ed.
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose?
Not so sure, I had to do nasty
On 04/05/13 19:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Would it be difficult to add a small button to the paned window buttons,
that allows for showing/hiding the extra features ?
Where do you want to put the 'hide' button without adding next row?
The idea was to add it to the paned window buttons, which is
On 05/05/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i
On 05/05/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose?
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
P
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
>
> I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i suppose…
ed.
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >> There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
> >
> > I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
>
> could also go into branch i suppose?
Not so sure, I had
On 04/05/13 19:19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Would it be difficult to add a small button to the paned window buttons,
>> that allows for showing/hiding the extra features ?
> Where do you want to put the 'hide' button without adding next row?
The idea was to add it to the "paned window buttons",
On 05/05/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
could also go into branch i
On 05/05/2013 06:01 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> On May 5, 2013, at 08:22 , Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
There are still quirks with not enough minimum size.
>>> I finally solved those too, fixed few typos and it's now in.
>> could also go into
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
detecting some width/height ratio ?
Hardcore version, but much easier:
attached
diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.cpp
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
detecting some width/height ratio ?
Hardcore version, but much easier:
attached
I can put this into 2.1 unless there are
On 04/05/13 09:17, Pavel Sanda wrote:
I can put this into 2.1 unless there are objections. Otherwise it's just next
item
in my personal patchset ;)
just searching for a collapsible qt widget or similar, there doesn't seem to be
anything :-(.
Imagine a user that hides by mistake, he/she
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Imagine a user that hides by mistake, he/she would be lost to realize that a
double-click is needed to show back the options.
That's why the tooltip.
Would it be difficult to add a small button to the paned window buttons, that
allows for showing/hiding the extra
On May 3, 2013, at 01:02 , Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On May 3, 2013, at 01:02 , Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that
I think would be an improvement?
It is very
Pavel Sanda wrote:
like in attached
patching file src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.cpp
patching file src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.h
patching file src/frontends/qt4/ui/ViewSourceUi.ui
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 111.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > > Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> > > detecting some width/height ratio ?
> >
> > Hardcore version, but much easier:
attached
diff --git a/src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.cpp
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > > > Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> > > > detecting some width/height ratio ?
> > >
> > > Hardcore version, but much easier:
>
> attached
I can put this into
On 04/05/13 09:17, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I can put this into 2.1 unless there are objections. Otherwise it's just next
> item
> in my personal patchset ;)
just searching for a collapsible qt widget or similar, there doesn't seem to be
anything :-(.
Imagine a user that hides by mistake, he/she
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Imagine a user that hides by mistake, he/she would be lost to realize that a
> double-click is needed to show back the options.
That's why the tooltip.
> Would it be difficult to add a small button to the paned window buttons, that
> allows for showing/hiding the
On May 3, 2013, at 01:02 , Richard Heck wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>> On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
>>> I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
>>> think would be an improvement?
>> It is very welcome,
Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On May 3, 2013, at 01:02 , Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> >> On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
> >>> I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that
> >>> I think would be an
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > like in attached
> >
>
> patching file src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.cpp
> patching file src/frontends/qt4/GuiViewSource.h
> patching file src/frontends/qt4/ui/ViewSourceUi.ui
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 111.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
On 03/05/13 00:02, Richard Heck wrote:
This would be easy to do...if we knew how to do it. How can we get these
widgets to reflow themselves to the bottom or something? Can we find out how
wide and tall, catch a signal when our size changes, and then reset
everything? I would guess this had
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
detecting some width/height ratio ?
Hardcore version, but much easier:
signal on_sourcewindow_width_changed(){
if (width100)
option_buttons.hide();
else
option_buttons.show();
}
Pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
detecting some width/height ratio ?
Hardcore version, but much easier:
or
sourcewindow.tooltip=double click to hide buttons;
signal on_sourcewindow_doubleclick(){
On 03/05/13 00:02, Richard Heck wrote:
> This would be easy to do...if we knew how to do it. How can we get these
> widgets to reflow themselves to the bottom or something? Can we find out how
> wide and tall, catch a signal when our size changes, and then reset
> everything? I would guess this
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> detecting some width/height ratio ?
Hardcore version, but much easier:
signal on_sourcewindow_width_changed(){
if (width<100)
option_buttons.hide();
else
option_buttons.show();
}
Pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> > Perhaps a QBoxLayout with some setDirection() called on resize, when
> > detecting some width/height ratio ?
>
> Hardcore version, but much easier:
>
or
sourcewindow.tooltip="double click to hide buttons";
signal
On 3/05/2013 7:52 a.m., Howard Rudd wrote:
Dear Lyx Developers
I have been using LyX for several years and I would like to say thanks
for producing such a brilliant piece of software. It's totally awesome.
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that
I think would
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what you say is burdening others as well!
I just dropped this request into a ticket
On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what you say is burdening others as well!
I just dropped this
Richard Heck wrote:
This would be easy to do...if we knew how to do it. How can we get these
Microbutton to roll/unroll all options?
I have been fighting with vertical size and it would be nice to get even smaller
(actually now I see someone added Master perspective into options -- I worked so
On 3/05/2013 7:52 a.m., Howard Rudd wrote:
Dear Lyx Developers
I have been using LyX for several years and I would like to say thanks
for producing such a brilliant piece of software. It's totally awesome.
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that
I think would
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
> I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
> think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what you say is burdening others as well!
I just dropped this request into a ticket
On 05/02/2013 06:16 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
On 02/05/13 20:52, Howard Rudd wrote:
I hope you don't mind me making a suggestion for a very small tweak that I
think would be an improvement?
It is very welcome, indeed! And what you say is burdening others as well!
I just dropped this
Richard Heck wrote:
> This would be easy to do...if we knew how to do it. How can we get these
Microbutton to roll/unroll all options?
I have been fighting with vertical size and it would be nice to get even smaller
(actually now I see someone added Master perspective into options -- I worked
48 matches
Mail list logo