... sort of.
I've been talking to a couple of the texmacs people on IRC, and came up
with the following stuff for generating texmacs-style bindings.
Restrictions :
1. M-t is a necessary prefix (due to lyx restriction :/)
2. you must press space after finishing a sequence (another lyx
... sort of.
I've been talking to a couple of the texmacs people on IRC, and came up
with the following stuff for generating texmacs-style bindings.
Restrictions :
1. M-t is a necessary prefix (due to lyx restriction :/)
2. you must press space after finishing a sequence (another lyx
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:05:57PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
For less scientific kind of writing one can try Garamond, or one of the
new beautiful fonts -- Minion. There were two excellent articles a few
years ago in _Cahier GUTenberg_ (a journal of a French TeX user's
group), by Thierry
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zvezdan That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
Zvezdan say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue. It's
Zvezdan a design. CM was designed by one of the greatest computer
Zvezdan scientist off all time, but
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
I know that. When I say decent PDF I mean the PDF read from the screen.
The printed page looks fine if you have a decent 600dpi printer.
However, on a less good printer even the printed page won't look fine.
The reason is that
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zvezdan That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
Zvezdan say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue. It's
Zvezdan a design. CM was
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Zvezdan == Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zvezdan That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
Zvezdan say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
Zvezdan That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
Zvezdan say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue. It's
Zvezdan a design. CM was designed by one of the greatest computer
Zvezdan
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:29:54PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
have a look at
http://www.myfonts.com/Person295.html
Herbert
As far as I understand English, that sentence says that Zapf and other
gave recommendations for improvement of Metafont _program_ _not_ CM.
Check out the book:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:42:17AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
As I recall, Zapf was involved in CM to some extent (at least giving
advice)
This was Euler not CM. And he designed it. Knuth was giving advice on
use of Metafont.
Check out the book:
Hermann Zapf his design philosophy :
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:05:57PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> For less scientific kind of writing one can try Garamond, or one of the
> new beautiful fonts -- Minion. There were two excellent articles a few
> years ago in _Cahier GUTenberg_ (a journal of a French TeX user's
> group), by
> "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zvezdan> That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
Zvezdan> say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue. It's
Zvezdan> a design. CM was designed by one of the greatest computer
Zvezdan> scientist off
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > I know that. When I say decent PDF I mean the PDF read from the screen.
> > The printed page looks fine if you have a decent 600dpi printer.
> > However, on a less good printer even the printed page won't look fine.
> > The
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Zvezdan> That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
> Zvezdan> say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue. It's
> Zvezdan> a
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Zvezdan" == Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Zvezdan> That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
> > Zvezdan> say above about Euler. Metafont itself
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > > Zvezdan> That's exactly what I meant. CM family is ugly. Notice what I
> > > Zvezdan> say above about Euler. Metafont itself is not an issue. It's
> > > Zvezdan> a design. CM was designed by one of the greatest computer
> >
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 07:29:54PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> have a look at
>
> http://www.myfonts.com/Person295.html
>
> Herbert
>
As far as I understand English, that sentence says that Zapf and other
gave recommendations for improvement of Metafont _program_ _not_ CM.
Check out the
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:42:17AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> As I recall, Zapf was involved in CM to some extent (at least giving
> advice)
This was Euler not CM. And he designed it. Knuth was giving advice on
use of Metafont.
Check out the book:
Hermann Zapf & his design philosophy :
Sorry to butt in, but this is a b\^ete noir(e?) of mine...
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:32:39PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
I do not consider seriously Metafont fonts since they are ugly,
starting with Computer Modern. Euler is a notable exception because
it was designed by
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:57:12AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
I do not consider seriously Metafont fonts since they are ugly,
starting with Computer Modern. Euler is a notable exception because
it was designed by Herman Zapf, of course. But it's available as
Type1 font
Sorry to butt in, but this is a b\^ete noir(e?) of mine...
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:32:39PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> I do not consider seriously Metafont fonts since they are ugly,
> starting with Computer Modern. Euler is a notable exception because
> it was designed
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 07:57:12AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > I do not consider seriously Metafont fonts since they are ugly,
> > starting with Computer Modern. Euler is a notable exception because
> > it was designed by Herman Zapf, of course. But it's available as
> >
Hi,
I am just wondering, if there are any suggestions to Question 5 of
http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
No, to be serious, is there any chance that the two projects cooperate in some
areas (pdf generation using pdflatex,...) ?
Thanks,
Rainer.
Rainer Dorsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi,
|
| I am just wondering, if there are any suggestions to Question 5 of
|
| http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
TeXmacs is a more ambitious project.
Is very subjective and from my point of view not true.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
I am just wondering, if there are any suggestions to Question 5 of
http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
No, to be serious, is there any chance that the two projects cooperate in some
areas (pdf generation using pdflatex,...) ?
| http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
TeXmacs is a more ambitious project.
Is very subjective and from my point of view not true.
Maybe it is indeed more ambitious, but LyX has delivered a better product
so far...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz
:
*
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 14:26:29 2001
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:26:29 -0400
From: Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joris van der Hoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TeXmacs advantages over LyX list
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi,
I am just wondering, if there are any suggestions to Question 5 of
http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
No, to be serious, is there any chance that the two projects cooperate in some
areas (pdf generation using pdflatex,...) ?
Thanks,
Rainer.
Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| I am just wondering, if there are any suggestions to Question 5 of
|
| http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
"TeXmacs is a more ambitious project."
Is very subjective and from my point of view not true.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> I am just wondering, if there are any suggestions to Question 5 of
>
> http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
>
> No, to be serious, is there any chance that the two projects cooperate in some
> areas (pdf generation using
> | http://www.texmacs.org/Web/FAQ.html
>
> "TeXmacs is a more ambitious project."
>
> Is very subjective and from my point of view not true.
Maybe it is indeed more ambitious, but LyX has delivered a better product
so far...
py
of that email here:
*
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 14:26:29 2001
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:26:29 -0400
From: Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TeXmacs advantages over LyX list
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PRO
Long long ago ... there was discussion about a scripting language for
LyX.
TeXmacs and Siag both use or can use guile.
I'm thinking along the lines of interactive textbooks or just a way to
provide sample solutions to equations in a graphics format. These are
just thoughts that I pass on.
Garst
Long long ago ... there was discussion about a scripting language for
LyX.
TeXmacs and Siag both use or can use guile.
I'm thinking along the lines of interactive textbooks or just a way to
provide sample solutions to equations in a graphics format. These are
just thoughts that I pass on.
Garst
ed in full glory.
You need to select a document style (e.g. document-style-article)
That was the first thing I did when I opened a new document. That why I
was frustrated. Perhaps there's a bug?
TeXmacs seems to do all its own hyphenation and you have to be in a
display mode that c
tead
> > although their documentation was displayed in full glory.
>
> You need to select a document style (e.g. document->style->article)
That was the first thing I did when I opened a new document. That why I
was frustrated. Perhaps there's a bug?
> > TeXmacs seems to do all
ment style (e.g. document-style-article)
TeXmacs seems to do all its own hyphenation and you have to be in a
display mode that corresponds to the width of the page to be able to print
the file. This makes me suspicious of how they are actually using LaTeX
TeXmacs doesn't use LaTe
ou need to select a document style (e.g. document->style->article)
> TeXmacs seems to do all its own hyphenation and you have to be in a
> display mode that corresponds to the width of the page to be able to print
> the file. This makes me suspicious of how they are actually usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
[ TeXmacs ]
Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
It's impressive! This seems to be real WYSIWYG with LaTeX which i
find rather astounding. The user interface is not very ergonomic
(tear-off menus would be handy) and the functionality too
On 23 Mar 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
[ TeXmacs ]
Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
It's impressive! This seems to be real WYSIWYG with LaTeX which i
find rather astounding.
Very pretty although I found the three possible formats
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
[ TeXmacs ]
>
> Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
>
It's impressive! This seems to be real WYSIWYG with LaTeX which i
find rather astounding. The user interface is not very ergonomic
(tear-off menus would be handy) and the func
On 23 Mar 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
>
> [ TeXmacs ]
> >
> > Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
> >
> It's impressive! This seems to be real WYSIWYG with LaTeX which i
> find rather astounding.
Very
I just found the following program:
http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~anh/TeXmacs/TeXmacs.html
It looks like a merge between emacs and TeX %-/
Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
JMarc
I just found the following program:
http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~anh/TeXmacs/TeXmacs.html
It looks like a merge between emacs and TeX %-/
Did anyone try it out? Is it any good?
JMarc
44 matches
Mail list logo
