Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
I use Qt4.2 too. Usually problems are noticed pretty fast. What I am
not sure about, though, is whether somebody tests LyX 1.5.x with Qt 4.1.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because then I would have used QDrag::start, just to get complains by
Qt 4.3 people that it does not complile.
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
rh
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
No, I'd be surprised that 4.3 cannot accept code that is valid in 4.2.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
No, I'd be surprised that 4.3 cannot accept code that is valid in 4.2.
At least the documentation
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
>> compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
I use Qt4.2 too. Usually problems are noticed pretty fast. What I am
not sure about, though, is whether somebody tests LyX 1.5.x with Qt 4.1.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because then I would have used QDrag::start, just to get complains by
Qt 4.3 people that it does not complile.
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
rh
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would be surprised.
> You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
No, I'd be surprised that 4.3 cannot accept code that is valid in 4.2.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
No, I'd be surprised that 4.3 cannot accept code that is valid in 4.2.
At least the documentation
On Saturday 15 March 2008 03:26:59 rgheck wrote:
(Does F9 include 4.4? That's alpha right now
anyway)
No. It usually enters rawhide (to be F9 now) when it is in the release
candidate stage. Since we one month away from F9 planned release I am sure it
will not come with F9. The scheduled
On Saturday 15 March 2008 03:26:59 rgheck wrote:
> (Does F9 include 4.4? That's alpha right now
> anyway)
No. It usually enters rawhide (to be F9 now) when it is in the release
candidate stage. Since we one month away from F9 planned release I am sure it
will not come with F9. The scheduled
Am 15.03.2008 um 04:39 schrieb Bo Peng:
What to do about QDrag::exec is another question. Presumably Andre
will
have a good idea.
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
Because then I would have used QDrag::start, just to
Am 15.03.2008 um 04:39 schrieb Bo Peng:
What to do about QDrag::exec is another question. Presumably Andre
will
have a good idea.
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
Because then I would have used QDrag::start, just to
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Oh, no, not another one of THESE discussions! I think the last time we
discussed this issue, we came to some kind of agreement that we'd stay
a
rgheck wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Oh, no, not another one of THESE discussions! I think the last time we
discussed this issue, we came to some kind of agreement that
What to do about QDrag::exec is another question. Presumably Andre will
have a good idea.
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
Bo
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Oh, no, not another one of THESE discussions! I think the last time we
discussed this issue, we came to some kind of agreement that we'd stay
"a
rgheck wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Oh, no, not another one of THESE discussions! I think the last time we
discussed this issue, we came to some kind of agreement that
> What to do about QDrag::exec is another question. Presumably Andre will
> have a good idea.
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
Bo
20 matches
Mail list logo
