Jürgen
you know what :-)-O means?
You are of course correct, but, I found it annoying having to do the
tlmgr update manually, and the --self doesn't do anything when not
necessary, so that's what I have hardwired into
tbu ()
{
tlmgr update --self --all
brew upgrade && brew cask upgrade
2018-06-21 0:01 GMT+02:00 Dr Eberhard Lisse :
> Jürgen,
>
> the correct command is tlmgr update --self --all :-)-O
>
tlmgr update --all is also correct. --self is only needed in case the tlmgr
itself gets an update (you get an warning in that case).
Jürgen
>
> el
>
Jürgen,
the correct command is tlmgr update --self --all :-)-O
el
On 2018-06-20 17:28 , Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda mailto:sa...@lyx.org>> schrieb am Mi., 2. TL
> is stabilized & freezed. Once all coathors have, say TL 2017, then
>
> you can be sure that no packages versions
On 06/20/2018 10:28 AM, Kees Zeelenberg wrote:
>
> >1. increased document interoperability between architectures because both
>
> > Linux and Mac use preferably TeX Live (MacTeX is redistribution of
>
> > TeX Live if I read their pages right, CMIIW).
>
>
>
> Both MikTeX and TeXLive use the
On 06/20/2018 09:12 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 06/19/2018 10:47 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>
>> Since we are doing changes in the installation workflow on Windows we
>> should
>> consider to advocate TeX Live instead of MiKTeX on official LyX web page
>> and I have in mind two reasons:
>>
>> 1.
>I actually checked that on linux distros under my hands (most importnantly
>debian)
>before triggering this debate and it turned out that miktex was not by default
>in
>the repositories, so proper miktex install goes far beyond few clicks
> in various package installers...
That is indeed a
Pavel Sanda schrieb am Mi., 2. TL is stabilized & freezed.
Once all coathors have, say TL 2017, then
>you can be sure that no packages versions would switch between
> computers.
>It's much harder to check what version of latex packages are on the
>computers when updates randomly
Kees Zeelenberg wrote:
> >1. increased document interoperability between architectures because both
> >Linux and Mac use preferably TeX Live (MacTeX is redistribution of TeX Live
> >if I read their pages right, CMIIW).
>
> Both MikTeX and TeXLive use the same sources, so there is no functional
>
>1. increased document interoperability between architectures because both
> Linux and Mac use preferably TeX Live (MacTeX is redistribution of
> TeX Live if I read their pages right, CMIIW).
Both MikTeX and TeXLive use the same sources, so there is no functional
difference. They only differ
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> As to the points above, for #1, LaTeX packages should behave the same on
> all platforms (unless the dreaded Windows line endings somehow muck things
> up), so I'm not sure why it would make a difference if I used MiKTeX and my
> coauthor used TeXLive.
Why it could make
On 06/19/2018 10:47 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Since we are doing changes in the installation workflow on Windows we should
consider to advocate TeX Live instead of MiKTeX on official LyX web page
and I have in mind two reasons:
1. increased document interoperability between architectures because
Le 19 juin 2018 23:48:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 19/06/2018 à 23:44, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
Protext is a MiKTeX installer built from TL:
What makes you think that it is based on texlive? The web page at
https://www.tug.org/protext/
only mentions miktex.
You are right of
Le 19/06/2018 à 23:44, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
Net TeXLive installer might be better in this regard. (?)
Protext is a MiKTeX installer built from TL: once the 2.6Go are
downloaded (time depends linearly upon the speed of the web connection),
I remember that installing LyX runs smoothly, and
Le 19 juin 2018 16:47:59 Pavel Sanda
Since we are doing changes in the installation workflow on Windows we should
consider to advocate TeX Live instead of MiKTeX on official LyX web page
and I have in mind two reasons:
1. increased document interoperability between architectures because
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Thanks Riki (and thanks for wading into the Windows swamp to update the
> installer).
Since we are doing changes in the installation workflow on Windows we should
consider to advocate TeX Live instead of MiKTeX on official LyX web page
and I have in mind two reasons:
1.
On 06/07/2018 12:23 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 06/06/2018 11:26 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:50:29PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry if this is answered somewhere -- I've been trying to follow the
various threads on a Windows installer but my aging brain is
On 06/06/2018 11:26 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:50:29PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>> Sorry if this is answered somewhere -- I've been trying to follow the
>> various threads on a Windows installer but my aging brain is overloading.
>>
>> Is there/will there soon be a
On 06/06/2018 11:26 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:50:29PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry if this is answered somewhere -- I've been trying to follow the
various threads on a Windows installer but my aging brain is overloading.
Is there/will there soon be a 2.3.0
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:50:29PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Sorry if this is answered somewhere -- I've been trying to follow the
> various threads on a Windows installer but my aging brain is overloading.
>
> Is there/will there soon be a 2.3.0 installer for Windows users who use
> TeXLive
Sorry if this is answered somewhere -- I've been trying to follow the
various threads on a Windows installer but my aging brain is overloading.
Is there/will there soon be a 2.3.0 installer for Windows users who use
TeXLive and not MiKTeX? I've got a co-author in that category, and I
would
20 matches
Mail list logo
