Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 20:49 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:13:51 +0100
> schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> > Le 18/03/2020 à 20:02, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > > Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100
> > > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> > >
> > >> Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48,
Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:13:51 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 18/03/2020 à 20:02, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100
> > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> >
> >> Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> >>> I've uploaded a Windows installer
Le 18/03/2020 à 20:02, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development
branch, as of about a week ago, here:
Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> > I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development
> > branch, as of about a week ago, here:
> >
> > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
>
> I
Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development
branch, as of about a week ago, here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
I think I am missing something: I see the sources, but where are the
installers?
JMarc
On 3/16/20 12:39 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:48:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> Please let us know if you encounter any issues. It would also be good
>> just to let us know if you are using this installer, just so we know
>> that actual testing is being done.
>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:48:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Please let us know if you encounter any issues. It would also be good
> just to let us know if you are using this installer, just so we know
> that actual testing is being done.
Perhaps it should go to users list as well?
I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development
branch, as of about a week ago, here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Note that these are best used by experienced users. They should be
fairly stable, but the whole point of uploading them is to try to avoid
the sorts
I've put a new Windows installer here
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
for testing. It is meant to fix bug #11750, which prevents proper
collection of TeX files on Windows.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Available here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please let me know how that goes.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:54:42 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 13/02/2020 à 14:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> > The patch I’ve posted was a workaround for elder TeX installations.
> > If we decide to require a TeX installation with footnotehyper this
> > may be reasonable but it’s not so
Le 13/02/2020 à 14:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The patch I’ve posted was a workaround for elder TeX installations.
If we decide to require a TeX installation with footnotehyper this
may be reasonable but it’s not so easy to see. I cannot tell what
the right answer is.
For the record I cannot
Am 07.02.2020 um 10:13 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> IMO it’s caused by a bad "no-break space“ character in sub-section
>> 3.9.2 Dashes and Line Breaks
>
> That's the sort of information I am trying to gather from you.
>
> In
Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Do not forget the obligatory bottles of Bourgogne and Champagne.
:-)
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Le 07/02/2020 à 10:11, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
As non-french who would write french documents
I would
find installing all french-related stuff in one package acceptable.
That's like: You want to have some Bordeaux with your
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> IMO it’s caused by a bad "no-break space“ character in sub-section
> 3.9.2 Dashes and Line Breaks
That's the sort of information I am trying to gather from you.
In any case, we have introduced footnotehyper for a reason, so it will
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> As non-french who would write french documents
> I would
> find installing all french-related stuff in one package acceptable.
That's like: You want to have some Bordeaux with your dinner? OK, but
then you need to reserve the French
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:10:17PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
> > packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
> > single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to
Am 05.02.2020 um 15:08 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 12:40 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> > Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> > (caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omit
> > footnotehyper?
>
> Yes I
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 13:06 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
> packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
> single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to packagers
> either :)
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 12:40 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> > Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> (caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omit
> footnotehyper?
>
> Yes I did. I get other errors with input encodings.
>
Do this depend on
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:24:12AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > So instead of reporting missing dependency we would need to ask for
> > restructuring the packaging, which is I am afraid too long shot.
> >
>
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.
I don't have really
Am 05.02.2020 um 11:53 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’m no expert for these things. But a normal user wants to see the users
> guide and not errors.
>
> Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
>
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’m no expert for these things. But a normal user wants to see the users
> guide and not errors.
>
Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
(caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply
Am 05.02.2020 um 10:57 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Yes, I’m sure. Because it’s already broken for missing footnotehyper package.
>
> This does not mean that it doesn't break without footnotehyper.
>
> Rather than just omitting
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Yes, I’m sure. Because it’s already broken for missing footnotehyper
> package.
This does not mean that it doesn't break without footnotehyper.
Rather than just omitting footnotehyper, it might be necessary to omit
footnote (or
Am 05.02.2020 um 07:02 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's presence with
>> isAvailable().
>> Patch attached, ok?
>
> Are you sure docs do not break with hyperref and plain footnote
>
Am 05.02.2020 um 09:15 schrieb mn :
>
> On 05.02.20 00:22, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>>> Alternatively, just try this:
>>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/UserGuide.pdf (2.3.3)
>>>
>>> open in Preview or Skim.
>>
>> No problem here with Preview or Skim.
>> "The LYX User’s Guide
>> by the LYX
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.
>
Wow. I had a look now. So everybody who needs to use French as a secondary
language (be it for one single word or quotation) needs to install all
French translations of
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> I checked in more detail debian and their of packaging is unf language
> based (so e.g. everything french related is in a single package worth
> of 70 mb for texlive 2019).
>
That's ridiculous. OpenSuse ships a texlive-babel-french
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 07:00:59AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think if people would complain, those packagers might revisit their
> decisions. These are really just a few Linux distros who do this. I
> don't think we should let ourselves constrain from this really
> nonsensical decision.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:56:07AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > It might be worth to report it, do we have clue whether adding all
> > other languages is heavy in terms of space (are some dictionaries
> > needed?)
>
> It's
On 05.02.20 00:22, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Alternatively, just try this:
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/UserGuide.pdf (2.3.3)
>>
>> open in Preview or Skim.
>
> No problem here with Preview or Skim.
> "The LYX User’s Guide
> by the LYX Team∗ Version 2.2.x
> April 20, 2017"
> Preview Version
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's presence with
> isAvailable().
> Patch attached, ok?
Are you sure docs do not break with hyperref and plain footnote
package?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 23:40 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> We don't really control was various distros do, obviously. I wonder
> whether it would be worth trying to pare down the User Guide a bit,
> so
> that it was compilable with a relatively minimal LaTeX installation.
> Stuff on
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> It might be worth to report it, do we have clue whether adding all
> other languages is heavy in terms of space (are some dictionaries
> needed?)
It's not heavy at all. Thos *.ldf files are rather short text files.
Language-specific
On 2/4/20 1:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:40:35PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>> Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
>>> due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel
Am 04.02.2020 um 18:38 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:11 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Is anyone able to reproduce the problems with Linux?
>
> Works for me.
>
> footnotehyper is in TeXLive and MikTeX as of 2016.
Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's
Am 04.02.2020 um 20:54 schrieb mn :
>
> On 04.02.20 18:11, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Anyway, the English version doesn’t work for me too.
>>
>> I'm facing a strange error:
>> ==
>> LaTeX Error: File `footnotehyper.sty' not found.
>> Enter file name:
>> ! Emergency stop.
>>
>>
>> l.36
On 04.02.20 18:11, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Anyway, the English version doesn’t work for me too.
>
> I'm facing a strange error:
> ==
> LaTeX Error: File `footnotehyper.sty' not found.
> Enter file name:
> ! Emergency stop.
>
>
> l.36 \usepackage
> {amsmath}^^M
> ***
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:40:35PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
> > due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel related
> > stuff).
> > Likely just matter
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
> due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel related
> stuff).
> Likely just matter of installing them, then maybe other stuff
> pops up as well. I do not think we
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:11 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Is anyone able to reproduce the problems with Linux?
Works for me.
footnotehyper is in TeXLive and MikTeX as of 2016.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:11:37PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Perhaps my LaTeX installation is outdated.
>
> Is anyone able to reproduce the problems with Linux?
Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel related
stuff).
Am 04.02.2020 um 07:52 schrieb mn :
>
> On 03.02.20 23:35, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Just got around testing the Mac version.
>>
>> Which Mac version did you test? The version you’ve built from source or the
>> official one from download?
>>
>
> macOS 10.12, TeXLive 2019.
> Release
On 03.02.20 23:35, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>> Just got around testing the Mac version.
>
> Which Mac version did you test? The version you’ve built from source or the
> official one from download?
>
macOS 10.12, TeXLive 2019.
Release version of LyX 2.3.4, as per download from ftp.lyx.org
Am 01.02.2020 um 14:48 schrieb mn :
>
> On 26.01.20 23:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
>> I've put a Windows installer here
>>
>> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
>>
>> for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
>> frankly, am not
On 26.01.20 23:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I've put a Windows installer here
>
> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
>
> for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
> frankly, am not at all sure I've done so correctly. It did manage
On 1/27/20 4:08 AM, Yu Jin wrote:
> Seems to work for me with imagemagick and ghostscript, tested some
> pictures and pdf, preview works.
Great. Thanks to you and to Andrew.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Seems to work for me with imagemagick and ghostscript, tested some pictures
and pdf, preview works.
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On 27/01/2020 11:51 am, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Hi, all,
I've put a Windows installer here
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
frankly, am not at all sure I've done so correctly. It did
Hi, all,
I've put a Windows installer here
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
frankly, am not at all sure I've done so correctly. It did manage to
export the User Guide, but I haven't tested
On 1/1/19 9:29 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 2/01/2019 12:35 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>
>> A Windows installer that should fix the previously reported issue has
>> been uploaded for testing here:
>>
>> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
>>
>> The issue was that citations could
On 2/01/2019 12:35 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
A Windows installer that should fix the previously reported issue has
been uploaded for testing here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
The issue was that citations could not be added in documents that used
the bibliography
A Windows installer that should fix the previously reported issue has
been uploaded for testing here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
The issue was that citations could not be added in documents that used
the bibliography environment, rather than BibTeX files. I have tested
myself
On 08/09/2018 21:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 09/08/2018 02:29 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 08/09/2018 20:13, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 09/08/2018 03:20 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 06/09/2018 19:37, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please
On 09/08/2018 02:29 PM, Daniel wrote:
> On 08/09/2018 20:13, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 09/08/2018 03:20 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2018 19:37, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please let us know if this fixes
On 08/09/2018 20:13, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 09/08/2018 03:20 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 06/09/2018 19:37, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please let us know if this fixes the slowness bug from before. If so,
we'll proceed to release.
On 09/08/2018 03:20 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 06/09/2018 19:37, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> Here:
>>
>> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
>>
>> Please let us know if this fixes the slowness bug from before. If so,
>> we'll proceed to release.
>>
>> Riki
>
> I didn't notice any
On 06/09/2018 19:37, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please let us know if this fixes the slowness bug from before. If so,
we'll proceed to release.
Riki
I didn't notice any slowness as compared to 2.3.0.
Daniel
On 7/09/2018 5:37 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please let us know if this fixes the slowness bug from before. If so,
we'll proceed to release.
Riki
I've installed this version and it solves the slowness problem with my
test
Here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
Please let us know if this fixes the slowness bug from before. If so,
we'll proceed to release.
Riki
Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 15:36 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> > Here's a simple patch which would need a bit of additional work,
> > but can
> > be a kind of proof of concept (and be tested). Comments?
The one which you accidentally committed looks promising.
Jürgen
> Updated patch.
On 1/09/2018 11:49 p.m., Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 11:09:58AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 20:27 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
OK, this time I inserted a Bib(la)TeX Bibliography via Insert >
List/TOC, using an old BibTeX .bib file I had
On 09/01/2018 03:34 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak mailto:skost...@lyx.org>> schrieb
> am Sa., 1. Sep. 2018, 21:26:
>
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 01:47:54PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > Another option for 2.3.1 would be to revert the commits that
> fixed
On 09/01/2018 01:36 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 09/01/2018 12:58 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 09/01/2018 10:02 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
Using the --verbose switch it can be seen that each time a
Scott Kostyshak schrieb am Sa., 1. Sep. 2018, 21:26:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 01:47:54PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > Another option for 2.3.1 would be to revert the commits that fixed #9158.
>
> +1 The bug does not seem important enough to risk anything at this
> point.
>
I'd
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 01:47:54PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Another option for 2.3.1 would be to revert the commits that fixed #9158.
+1 The bug does not seem important enough to risk anything at this
point.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 09/01/2018 01:36 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 09/01/2018 12:58 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 09/01/2018 10:02 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
Using the --verbose switch it can be seen that each time a
On 09/01/2018 12:58 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 09/01/2018 10:02 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>>> Using the --verbose switch it can be seen that each time a new
>>> paragraph
>>> is started LyX runs kpsewhich for each
On 09/01/2018 10:02 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>> Using the --verbose switch it can be seen that each time a new
>> paragraph
>> is started LyX runs kpsewhich for each bibtex catalog to be found in
>> the
>> texmf tree. So, if
On 01/09/2018 01:11, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 05:58 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
It might be the same
Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 13:49 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Using the --verbose switch it can be seen that each time a new
> paragraph
> is started LyX runs kpsewhich for each bibtex catalog to be found in
> the
> texmf tree. So, if you have 5 catalogs, kpsewhich is run for 5 times
>
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 11:09:58AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 20:27 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> > OK, this time I inserted a Bib(la)TeX Bibliography via Insert >
> > List/TOC, using an old BibTeX .bib file I had lying around. Even a
> > small
> > trial
Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 01/09/2018 à 11:09, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
> > The crucial info we need is what makes this so slow only on Windows
> > (and not on any other OS). Can we do profiling on Win?
>
> Could we have a document that exhibits
Le 01/09/2018 à 11:09, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
The crucial info we need is what makes this so slow only on Windows
(and not on any other OS). Can we do profiling on Win?
Could we have a document that exhibits the problem?
JMarc
Am Samstag, den 01.09.2018, 20:27 +1200 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> OK, this time I inserted a Bib(la)TeX Bibliography via Insert >
> List/TOC, using an old BibTeX .bib file I had lying around. Even a
> small
> trial document is noticeably slower for things like starting a new
> paragraph,
On 1/09/2018 7:13 p.m., Daniel wrote:
On 2018-09-01 08:57, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 1/09/2018 11:11 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 05:58 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard
On 1/09/2018 7:13 p.m., Daniel wrote:
On 2018-09-01 08:57, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 1/09/2018 11:11 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 05:58 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2018, 23:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> > The thread with "Beta1 is slow on undo“ perhaps?
> >
> > Stephan
> >
>
> Probably, I seem not to be able to access them from here.
https://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel=150739249920974=2
The respective ticket is
On 2018-09-01 08:57, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
On 1/09/2018 11:11 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 05:58 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018
On 1/09/2018 11:11 a.m., Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 05:58 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
It might be the same
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 01:23:19PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 08/31/2018 10:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
> >> First, here is the information:
> >>
> >> LyX Version 2.3.1
> >> (30 August 2018)
> >> Built from git commit hash 65bc3149
> >> Library directory: C:\Program Files (x86)\LyX
On 08/31/2018 05:58 PM, Daniel wrote:
> On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
>>> On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
> It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version
On 2018-08-31 22:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version at first.
Once I have a bibliography included the delay is
On 2018-08-31 22:15, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 31.08.2018 um 19:31 schrieb Daniel :
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version at first.
Once I have a bibliography included the delay is there
On 08/31/2018 01:31 PM, Daniel wrote:
> On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>
>>> It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version at first.
>>> Once I have a bibliography included the delay is there (and the more
>>> bibliographies
Am 31.08.2018 um 19:31 schrieb Daniel :
>
> On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>
>>> It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version at first.
>>> Once I have a bibliography included the delay is there (and the more
>>>
On 2018-08-31 19:23, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version at first.
Once I have a bibliography included the delay is there (and the more
bibliographies the worse). I can't find the posting from the last
On 08/31/2018 10:33 AM, Daniel wrote:
>
> It might be the same problem as plagued the 2.3.0 version at first.
> Once I have a bibliography included the delay is there (and the more
> bibliographies the worse). I can't find the posting from the last
> version but I seem to remember that Jürgen and
On 08/31/2018 10:44 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 31/08/2018 16:33, Daniel wrote:
>> On 31/08/2018 16:09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:59:34PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
On 31/08/2018 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/08/2018 à 13:27, Daniel a écrit :
>>
On 08/31/2018 05:54 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 31/08/2018 00:52, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> Windows installers for 2.3.1 are at
>> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/. Please let me know if you
>> have any problems. But I know there are some weird issues with MiKTeX
>> right now, and I've
On 31/08/2018 16:33, Daniel wrote:
On 31/08/2018 16:09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:59:34PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
On 31/08/2018 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 31/08/2018 à 13:27, Daniel a écrit :
Unfortunately, LyX 2.3.1 is not usable for me. Many simple things
On 31/08/2018 16:09, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:59:34PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
On 31/08/2018 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 31/08/2018 à 13:27, Daniel a écrit :
Unfortunately, LyX 2.3.1 is not usable for me. Many simple things
take a couple of seconds, like when I
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:59:34PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
> On 31/08/2018 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 31/08/2018 à 13:27, Daniel a écrit :
> > > Unfortunately, LyX 2.3.1 is not usable for me. Many simple things
> > > take a couple of seconds, like when I press enter for a new
> > >
On 31/08/2018 15:18, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 31/08/2018 à 13:27, Daniel a écrit :
Unfortunately, LyX 2.3.1 is not usable for me. Many simple things take
a couple of seconds, like when I press enter for a new paragraph,
delete something, click on another paragraph, etc.
That is very
Le 31/08/2018 à 13:27, Daniel a écrit :
Unfortunately, LyX 2.3.1 is not usable for me. Many simple things take a
couple of seconds, like when I press enter for a new paragraph, delete
something, click on another paragraph, etc.
That is very very weird. I have to give it a go. A couple of
On 31/08/2018 00:52, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Windows installers for 2.3.1 are at
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/. Please let me know if you
have any problems. But I know there are some weird issues with MiKTeX
right now, and I've seen signs of that in my own testing.
Riki
On 31/08/2018 00:52, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Windows installers for 2.3.1 are at
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/. Please let me know if you
have any problems. But I know there are some weird issues with MiKTeX
right now, and I've seen signs of that in my own testing.
Riki
Here
On 31/08/2018 00:52, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Windows installers for 2.3.1 are at
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/. Please let me know if you
have any problems. But I know there are some weird issues with MiKTeX
right now, and I've seen signs of that in my own testing.
Riki
Just
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
