Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/11/2013 07:11 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org mailto:you...@lyx.org wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org mailto:sa...@lyx.org wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I will

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/11/2013 07:11 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Abdelrazak Younes > wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pavel Sanda > wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Guys Qt has a nice xml reader Also one with a nice stream like interface that would fit nicely in ours parser. And it quite fast too. I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. Abdel On May 9, 2013 11:26 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 05/09/2013 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano. Anyway it's too late, Richard already barricaded in underground garage of his house and won't show until 378 patches implementing xml is done as I

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 11/05/2013 6:40 p.m., Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano. Anyway it's too late, Richard already barricaded in underground garage of his house and won't show

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano. Anyway it's too late, Richard already barricaded in underground garage of his

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Andrew Parsloe apars...@clear.net.nzwrote: It is absolutely none of my business, but I do enjoy my daily 'fix' eavesdropping on developer messages. The live show is even more entertaining :-) Alessandro, do you like it? Abdel.

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano.

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Guys Qt has a nice xml reader Also one with a nice stream like interface that would fit nicely in ours parser. And it quite fast too. I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. Abdel On May 9, 2013 11:26 PM, "Richard Heck" wrote: > On 05/09/2013 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano. Anyway it's too late, Richard already barricaded in underground garage of his house and won't show until 378 patches implementing xml is done as I

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 11/05/2013 6:40 p.m., Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano. Anyway it's too late, Richard already barricaded in underground garage of his house and won't show

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. > > You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is in Milano. > Anyway it's too late, Richard already barricaded in underground garage

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > >> It is absolutely none of my business, but I do enjoy my daily 'fix' > eavesdropping on developer messages. > The live show is even more entertaining :-) Alessandro, do you like it? Abdel.

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> > I will discuss that face2face during the meeting. >> >> You should bring mirror then, no one else in this thread is

Re: Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Thursday 09 May 2013 14:21:37 Richard Heck wrote: On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. Richard From the webpage: Libxml2 is known to be very portable, the library should build

Re: Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

José Matos wrote: Or are you thinking about any other system that is not included in this list? :-) I don't see Haiku, where we currently compile ;) What would be the disadvantage of relying on it? I mean what are concerns about depending on it? But jokes aside, you have to rely on

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 09-05-2013 18:52, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/08/2013 06:24 PM, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote: Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML? Or should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose? Richard Lars had that working

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/10/2013 04:46 AM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 09 May 2013 14:21:37 Richard Heck wrote: On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. Richard From the webpage: Libxml2 is known to be

Re: Re: Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Friday 10 May 2013 02:19:40 Pavel Sanda wrote: But jokes aside, you have to rely on arbitrary decision of third party which can do whatever is pleased to do so in new versions, if some problem arises you can't stick to version known to work, because the other guys have the library on

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Richard Heck wrote: No, I just meant that we would have to include it in our sources, since we cannot rely upon libxml to be available on actual machines that are running non-Linux OSs. It's available for that OS, yes, but it's not actually going to be installed. Unlike on Linux, where it

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Georg Baum wrote: With the same reasoning you could conclude that we need to ship Qt within the sources. If there is a bug at the right place in Qt, you can get all sorts of problems including severe data loss as well. But, we don't include Well, indirectly yes, but still, we don't use Qt

Re: Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Thursday 09 May 2013 14:21:37 Richard Heck wrote: > On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library > already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. > > Richard >From the webpage: "Libxml2 is known to be very portable, the library should

Re: Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

José Matos wrote: > Or are you thinking about any other system that is not included in this list? > :-) I don't see Haiku, where we currently compile ;) > What would be the disadvantage of relying on it? I mean what are concerns > about depending on it? But jokes aside, you have to rely on

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 09-05-2013 18:52, Richard Heck wrote: On 05/08/2013 06:24 PM, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote: Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML? Or should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose? Richard Lars had that working

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/10/2013 04:46 AM, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 09 May 2013 14:21:37 Richard Heck wrote: On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. Richard From the webpage: "Libxml2 is known to be

Re: Re: Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Friday 10 May 2013 02:19:40 Pavel Sanda wrote: > But jokes aside, you have to rely on arbitrary decision of third party which > can do whatever is pleased to do so in new versions, if some problem arises > you > can't stick to version known to work, because the other guys have the library > on

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Richard Heck wrote: > No, I just meant that we would have to include it in our sources, since > we cannot rely upon libxml to be available on actual machines that are > running non-Linux OSs. It's available for that OS, yes, but it's not > actually going to be installed. Unlike on Linux, where it

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Georg Baum wrote: > With the same reasoning you could conclude that we need to ship Qt within > the sources. If there is a bug at the right place in Qt, you can get all > sorts of problems including severe data loss as well. But, we don't include Well, indirectly yes, but still, we don't use

XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/08/2013 06:24 PM, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote: Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML? Or should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose? Richard Lars had that working for a previous version of lyx with lexer.

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478 but it appears to be based upon xmlpp, which I cannot get

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/09/2013 01:39 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478 but it appears

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Richard Heck wrote: On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources so it is fixed and we do not rely in any

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/09/2013 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources so

XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/08/2013 06:24 PM, José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 08 May 2013 17:43:41 Richard Heck wrote: Thinking ahead, however: Should we use some SAX library to read the XML? Or should we just adapt the Lexer for this purpose? Richard Lars had that working for a previous version of lyx with lexer.

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck wrote: I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478 but it appears to be based upon xmlpp, which I cannot

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/09/2013 01:39 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Richard Heck wrote: I just had a look at those. He had an XML parser here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyxsvn/lyx-devel/branches/personal/larsbj/xml/src/support/xmlparser.h?rev=19478 but it appears

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

Richard Heck wrote: > On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library > already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources so it is fixed and we do not rely in any

Re: XML Parsing Library [was Re: XML For LyX]

On 05/09/2013 02:25 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: On Linux, of course, it is different. One would just expect this library already to be installed. But things do not work that way on the other OSs. I belive we should actually _include_ some leightweight library in our sources so