Re: letter layout

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on the drop down list are My Address and Send To

[helgehaf@idb.hist.no: Re: letter layout]

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
I guess that the real destination is the list and not me. -- José Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show up on the View Ps. CVS current They must

Re: letter layout

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:50:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I am currently removing the bogus use of the Latex tag in all the letter classes and in egs.layout. What remains is the use in DocBook classes for the SGML layouts. So the question now is: should we revive the defunct

Re: letter layout

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jose Does it means pass the text literally and ignore other font Jose information? Yes. Good, I will soon remove the latex font from docbook layout files using this. Jose Regarding the support for Verbatim what

Re: letter layout

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > > > > I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on > > > the drop down list are My Address and

[helgehaf@idb.hist.no: Re: letter layout]

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
I guess that the real destination is the list and not me. -- José Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show > > up on the View Ps. > > CVS current > >

Re: letter layout

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:50:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I am currently removing the bogus use of the Latex tag in all the > letter classes and in egs.layout. What remains is the use in DocBook > classes for the SGML layouts. So the question now is: should we revive > the defunct

Re: letter layout

2001-09-07 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Jose> Does it means "pass the text literally and ignore other font > Jose> information"? > > Yes. Good, I will soon remove the latex font from docbook layout files using this. > Jose> Regarding the support for

letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Garst R. Reese
I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show up on the View Ps. CVS current Garst

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show up on the View Ps. CVS current They must follow a precise order to be printed. There is some documentation about that. Also look to the example file. I

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Garst R. Reese
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show up on the View Ps. CVS current They must follow a precise order to be printed. There is some documentation

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on the drop down list are My Address and Send To Address. cc etc went missing. It makes sense now. Please blame Jean-Marc. Since he will only see this on

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Voss
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on the drop down list are My Address and Send To Address. cc etc went missing. It makes sense now. Please blame

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Garst R. Reese
R. Lahaye wrote: When I open New from template letter.lyx, I get the following message in my xterminal: Herbert pointed out the Latex problem earlier today. The question is whether to flame JMarc or LGB. They are both so deserving it is a tough decision. Garst

letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Garst R. Reese
I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show up on the View Ps. CVS current Garst

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show > up on the View Ps. > CVS current They must follow a precise order to be printed. There is some documentation about that. Also look to the example file.

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Garst R. Reese
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:54:51PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > I just tried to do a letter. My Address and Send To Address did not show > > up on the View Ps. > > CVS current > > They must follow a precise order to be printed. There is some >

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on > the drop down list are My Address and Send To Address. > cc etc went missing. It makes sense now. Please blame Jean-Marc. Since he will only see this on

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Voss
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:25:22PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > > I knew about that, but now in letter, the only things that show up on > > the drop down list are My Address and Send To Address. > > cc etc went missing. > > It makes sense now. Please

Re: letter layout

2001-09-06 Thread Garst R. Reese
"R. Lahaye" wrote: > > When I open "New from template" letter.lyx, I get the following > message in my xterminal: Herbert pointed out the Latex problem earlier today. The question is whether to flame JMarc or LGB. They are both so deserving it is a tough decision. Garst

Re: letter layout

1999-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Garst" == Garst R Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Garst When I try to View PostScript with file, I get an error between Garst Dear and John, No line to end. Can somebody explain what's Garst going on here. If I use the letter-template and fill in Garst Opening, it works. -- Garst You need

Re: letter layout

1999-01-05 Thread Garst R. Reese
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Garst" == Garst R Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Garst OK, that worked. Bizzarr. I changed the order of Signature in Garst stdletter.inc. That works. I'll look again at the docs to see Garst if I can make it a little clearer which fields are required and

Re: letter layout

1999-01-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Garst> When I try to View PostScript with file, I get an error between Garst> Dear and John, No line to end. Can somebody explain what's Garst> going on here. If I use the letter-template and fill in Garst> Opening, it works. -- Garst

Re: letter layout

1999-01-05 Thread Garst R. Reese
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Garst> OK, that worked. Bizzarr. I changed the order of Signature in > Garst> stdletter.inc. That works. I'll look again at the docs to see > Garst> if I can make it a little clearer which fields are