Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars it is ok to have different streams for latex,ascii,sgml, but we
Lars should also see if we can get rid of the latex,ascii,sgml output
Lars methods in the insets. and have the actuall output methods
Lars external to the insets. This
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel b, then the generated LaTeX code is:
a\footnote{%
foo}%
b
All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage returns
and
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars it is ok to have different streams for latex,ascii,sgml, but we
| Lars should also see if we can get rid of the latex,ascii,sgml output
| Lars methods in the insets. and have the
Without reading the whole thread I'd second to drop the comment signs.
My reason: I sometimes exchange TeX-files with other people not using
LyX. As soon as you do a reformat-paragraph in an external editor, the
above ends up as
a\footnote{% foo}% b
and the footnote is gone :-(
Well
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'd really like to see the footnote code in the tex document stand out
a bit and thus I want the closing brace to be on a line of its own, or
last on a line.
what about something like
this is some text%
\footnote{And here is some explanation,
maybe in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars it is ok to have different streams for latex,ascii,sgml, but we
| Lars should also see if we can get rid of the latex,ascii,sgml output
| Lars methods in the insets. and have the
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> it is ok to have different streams for latex,ascii,sgml, but we
Lars> should also see if we can get rid of the latex,ascii,sgml output
Lars> methods in the insets. and have the actuall output methods
Lars> external to the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dekel> b", then the generated LaTeX code is:
> a\footnote{%
> foo}%
> b
> All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
> with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> it is ok to have different streams for latex,ascii,sgml, but we
| Lars> should also see if we can get rid of the latex,ascii,sgml output
| Lars> methods in the insets.
> Without reading the whole thread I'd second to drop the comment signs.
> My reason: I sometimes exchange TeX-files with other people not using
> LyX. As soon as you do a reformat-paragraph in an external editor, the
> above ends up as
> a\footnote{% foo}% b
> and the footnote is gone :-(
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd really like to see the footnote code in the tex document stand out
> a bit and thus I want the closing brace to be on a line of its own, or
> last on a line.
what about something like
this is some text%
\footnote{And here is some explanation,
maybe in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> it is ok to have different streams for latex,ascii,sgml, but we
| Lars> should also see if we can get rid of the latex,ascii,sgml output
| Lars> methods in the insets.
On 10-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage returns
and comments. Do we really need them?
Well IMO the best solution is to return to the code as it was before so
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 10-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
| with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage returns
| and comments. Do we really need them?
|
| Well IMO the best
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| is the same as above as the footnotecode would anyway remove any leading space
| before the first text-part inside the {} (correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not
| I tried it first ;)
I belive current CVS fixes the problem.
--
Lgb
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen On 10-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage
returns and comments. Do we really need them?
Juergen Well
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars I'd really like to see the footnote code in the tex document
Lars stand out a bit and thus I want the closing brace to be on a
Lars line of its own, or last on a line.
That's a matter of taste, I guess. Personnally, I prefer to have
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I think we should output aa\footnote{bb} cc and have our own
specialized stream to output latex which is able to break lines when
needed. I have some ideas about that and this is something I'd like to
do at Bolzano. BTW Juergen, what are the latest
On 11-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is actually easy to differenciate... in InsetFoot we know how
many lines the footnote-body consist of. the problem then is line length.
The problem is also that we don't know at what position we actually are
on the actual line when starting
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
BTW Juergen, what are the latest plans for June?
No changes! We have to work, work, work!!! Well maybe we have some beer,
wine, ... and then obviously we have the obligatory sightseeing tour and
you
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen No changes! We have to work, work, work!!! Well maybe we have
Juergen some beer, wine, ... and then obviously we have the
Juergen obligatory sightseeing tour and you know how that day ended
Juergen last time, don't you. If you don't
On 11-May-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
The kind of danger people most enjoy is the kind they can watch from
a safe place.
This seems strangely appropriate.
I might just wait here...
Well you would have to have really good eyes, wouldn't you?
Jürgen
--
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen No changes! We have to work, work, work!!! Well maybe we have
Juergen some beer, wine, ... and then obviously we have the
Juergen obligatory sightseeing tour and you know how that day
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 11-May-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
The kind of danger people most enjoy is the kind they can watch from
a safe place.
This seems strangely appropriate.
I might just wait here...
Well you would have to have really good eyes, wouldn't you?
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
Juergen that early or have to depart before)
OK, I'll probably not stay that long (probably 4 days). Does it mean
21 and 26 included?
JMarc
On 11-May-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
No, I'll just what the world news or at least the Italian news service.
It shouldn't be too hard to figure out which story is referring to
drunken hackers run amok at village swimming pool ;-)
#:O) this was a good one I vote to put it in the next LDN!!!
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
Juergen that early or have to depart before)
OK, I'll probably not stay that long (probably 4 days). Does it mean
21 and 26
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
Juergen that early or have to depart before)
OK, I'll probably not stay that
I think that we should handle this file format stuff at the lowest
possible level.
Seconded. And the solution you propose is a good one.
There are nice examples for such specialized streams all over the web.
Simply ask altavista for '+Dietmar Kuehl streambuf' or similar...
Andre'
--
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
|
| On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Juergen Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
| Juergen that early or have
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I think that we should handle this file format stuff at the lowest
| possible level.
|
| Seconded. And the solution you propose is a good one.
|
| There are nice examples for such specialized streams all over the web.
| Simply ask altavista for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Juergen On 11-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| This is actually easy to differenciate... in InsetFoot we know how
| many lines the footnote-body consist of. the problem then is line
|
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when outputting to
Lars streams, only when outputting to lyxerr/cerr
Yes, but we should (or rather a lyx::endl, if you prefer). This would
avoid all the mess about adding a \n when there is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when outputting to
| Lars streams, only when outputting to lyxerr/cerr
|
| Yes, but we should (or rather a lyx::endl, if you prefer). This
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |
Lars Lars Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when outputting
Lars to | Lars streams, only when outputting to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
| Lars Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |
| Lars Lars Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars we should change the name as well.
Lars and it will probaly not hurt to be a bit more verbose:
Lars lyx::newline (or lyx::newl) (or lyx::linefeed , lyx::lf)
Anything. I have no particular idea about the names we should use. I'm
more
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars we should change the name as well.
|
| Lars and it will probaly not hurt to be a bit more verbose:
|
| Lars lyx::newline (or lyx::newl) (or lyx::linefeed , lyx::lf)
|
| Anything.
On 10-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
> with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage returns
> and comments. Do we really need them?
Well IMO the best solution is to return to the code as it was before
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 10-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| > All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
| > with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage returns
| > and comments. Do we really need them?
|
| Well IMO the
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| is the same as above as the footnotecode would anyway remove any leading space
| before the first text-part inside the {} (correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm not
| I tried it first ;)
I belive current CVS fixes the problem.
--
Lgb
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 10-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> All leading space on a line is ignored when the previous line ends
>> with %. The solution is probably to avoid those extra carriage
>> returns and comments. Do we really need
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I'd really like to see the footnote code in the tex document
Lars> stand out a bit and thus I want the closing brace to be on a
Lars> line of its own, or last on a line.
That's a matter of taste, I guess. Personnally, I
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think we should output "aa\footnote{bb} cc" and have our own
> specialized stream to output latex which is able to break lines when
> needed. I have some ideas about that and this is something I'd like to
> do at Bolzano. BTW Juergen, what are the
On 11-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is actually easy to differenciate... in InsetFoot we know how
> many lines the footnote-body consist of. the problem then is line length.
The problem is also that we don't know at what position we actually are
on the actual line when starting
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
> > BTW Juergen, what are the latest plans for June?
>
> No changes! We have to work, work, work!!! Well maybe we have some beer,
> wine, ... and then obviously we have the obligatory sightseeing tour and
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> No changes! We have to work, work, work!!! Well maybe we have
Juergen> some beer, wine, ... and then obviously we have the
Juergen> obligatory sightseeing tour and you know how that day ended
Juergen> last time, don't you. If
On 11-May-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
>> The kind of danger people most enjoy is the kind they can watch from
>> a safe place.
>
> This seems strangely appropriate.
>
> I might just wait here...
Well you would have to have really good eyes, wouldn't you?
Jürgen
--
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> No changes! We have to work, work, work!!! Well maybe we have
> Juergen> some beer, wine, ... and then obviously we have the
> Juergen> obligatory sightseeing tour and you know
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 11-May-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
>
> >> The kind of danger people most enjoy is the kind they can watch from
> >> a safe place.
> >
> > This seems strangely appropriate.
> >
> > I might just wait here...
>
> Well you would have to have really good eyes,
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
Juergen> that early or have to depart before)
OK, I'll probably not stay that long (probably 4 days). Does it mean
21 and 26 included?
JMarc
On 11-May-2001 Allan Rae wrote:
> No, I'll just what the world news or at least the Italian news service.
> It shouldn't be too hard to figure out which story is referring to
> "drunken hackers run amok at village swimming pool" ;-)
#:O) this was a good one I vote to put it in the next
On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
> Juergen> that early or have to depart before)
>
> OK, I'll probably not stay that long (probably 4 days). Does it
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Juergen> Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
> > Juergen> that early or have to depart before)
> >
> > OK,
> I think that we should handle this file format stuff at the lowest
> possible level.
Seconded. And the solution you propose is a good one.
There are nice examples for such specialized streams all over the web.
Simply ask altavista for '+Dietmar Kuehl streambuf' or similar...
Andre'
--
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 11 May 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| >
| > On 11-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > >> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > >
| > > Juergen> Sure 21-26 June! (or in between for people who cannot arrive
| > >
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I think that we should handle this file format stuff at the lowest
| > possible level.
|
| Seconded. And the solution you propose is a good one.
|
| There are nice examples for such specialized streams all over the web.
| Simply ask altavista for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Juergen> On 11-May-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> This is actually easy to differenciate... in InsetFoot we know how
| >> many lines the footnote-body consist of. the
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when outputting to
Lars> streams, only when outputting to lyxerr/cerr
Yes, but we should (or rather a lyx::endl, if you prefer). This would
avoid all the mess about adding a \n when
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when outputting to
| Lars> streams, only when outputting to lyxerr/cerr
|
| Yes, but we should (or rather a lyx::endl, if you
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> Note that we don't use (almost) std::endl when outputting
Lars> to | Lars> streams, only
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Lars> Note that we don't use
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> we should change the name as well.
Lars> and it will probaly not hurt to be a bit more verbose:
Lars> lyx::newline (or lyx::newl) (or lyx::linefeed , lyx::lf)
Anything. I have no particular idea about the names we should
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> we should change the name as well.
|
| Lars> and it will probaly not hurt to be a bit more verbose:
|
| Lars> lyx::newline (or lyx::newl) (or lyx::linefeed , lyx::lf)
|
Hi,
if you insert a footnote between two words, the words are concatenated in the
dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the lyx document.
Michael
PS: What is the current status of the natbib branch? Is it still maintained?
--
Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi,
|
| if you insert a footnote between two words, the words are concatenated in the
| dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the
| lyx document.
what lyx version?
with CVS version footnotes should be no different from any
Hi Lars,
the LyX version I use is about three days old (Kayvan's Binary).
Michael
--
==
Michael Schmittphone: +49 451 500 3725
Institute for Telematics secretary: +49 451 500
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 12:12:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the
| lyx document.
with CVS version footnotes should be no different from any other kind
of inset. so if this bug is there we have it for all insets not just
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Hi,
|
| if you insert a footnote between two words, the words are concatenated in the
| dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the
| lyx document.
what lyx version?
with CVS version
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have a\footnote{foo}
Dekel b, then the generated LaTeX code is:
a\footnote{%
foo}%
b
Dekel For some reason, the space before the 'b' is ignored, so the
Dekel dvi shows 'a^1b'. This also happen for
a\footnote{%
foo}%
b
For some reason, the space before the 'b' is ignored, so the dvi shows 'a^1b'.
This also happen for example in the following latex code (the dvi shows 'ab':
a{}%
The reason are standard TeX syntax rules: Any leading whitespace in a line
is ignored as well as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have a\footnote{foo}
| Dekel b, then the generated LaTeX code is:
|
| a\footnote{%
| foo}%
| b
will a\footnote{%
foo}
b
work correctly?
--
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |
Lars Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have
Lars a\footnote{foo} | Dekel b, then the generated LaTeX code is:
Lars |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |
Lars Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have
Lars a\footnote{foo} | Dekel b, then
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
| Lars Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | |
| Lars Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have
| Lars
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have a\footnote{foo}
| Dekel b, then the generated LaTeX code is:
|
|
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Dekel No the problem is footnote specific. If I have a\footnote{foo}
|
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:09:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Are you saying that
a\\footnote{%
foo}\n
b
equals:
a\\footnote{foot} b
?
Yes.
Hi,
if you insert a footnote between two words, the words are concatenated in the
dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the lyx document.
Michael
PS: What is the current status of the "natbib" branch? Is it still maintained?
--
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| if you insert a footnote between two words, the words are concatenated in the
| dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the
| lyx document.
what lyx version?
with CVS version footnotes should be no different from any
Hi Lars,
the LyX version I use is about three days old (Kayvan's Binary).
Michael
--
==
Michael Schmittphone: +49 451 500 3725
Institute for Telematics secretary: +49 451 500
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 12:12:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the
> | lyx document.
> with CVS version footnotes should be no different from any other kind
> of inset. so if this bug is there we have it for all insets not
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | if you insert a footnote between two words, the words are concatenated in the
> | dvi output even though there is a space after the footnote in the
> | lyx document.
>
> what lyx version?
>
> with CVS
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific. If I have "a\footnote{foo}
Dekel> b", then the generated LaTeX code is:
a\footnote{%
foo}%
b
Dekel> For some reason, the space before the 'b' is ignored, so the
Dekel> dvi shows 'a^1b'. This
> a\footnote{%
> foo}%
> b
>
> For some reason, the space before the 'b' is ignored, so the dvi shows 'a^1b'.
> This also happen for example in the following latex code (the dvi shows 'ab':
> a{}%
The reason are standard TeX syntax rules: Any leading whitespace in a line
is ignored as well as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific. If I have "a\footnote{foo}
| Dekel> b", then the generated LaTeX code is:
|
| a\footnote{%
| foo}%
| b
will a\footnote{%
foo}
b
work
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific. If I have
Lars> "a\footnote{foo} | Dekel> b", then the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
> Lars> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
> Lars> Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific. If I have
> Lars>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific.
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific. If I have "a\footnote{foo}
> | Dekel> b", then the generated
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:50:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Dekel> No the problem is footnote specific. If I have
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:09:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Are you saying that
>
> "a\\footnote{%
> foo}\n
> b"
>
> equals:
>
> "a\\footnote{foot} b"
>
> ?
Yes.
92 matches
Mail list logo
