On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:00:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Probably you meant raw pointers, no?
|
| No I meant (raw) row pointer
|
| Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
I have no idea what you are talking about!
(My qualities are
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:37:56PM +, José Matos wrote:
Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
gently down the stream...
I think that this would be the only place where Lars allows a raw pointer,
as long as it has a boat...
That's the point. You'd need at least an assert or use a
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:00:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > > Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
> | >
> | > No I meant (raw) "row" pointer
> |
> | Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about!
> (My
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:37:56PM +, José Matos wrote:
> > Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
> > gently down the ...
>
> I think that this would be the only place where Lars allows a raw pointer,
> as long as it has a boat...
That's the point. You'd need at least an assert or use a
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Friday 21 March 2003 10:42, Juergen Vigna wrote:
| José Matos wrote:
| Probably you meant raw pointers, no?
|
| No I meant (raw) row pointer
|
| Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
I have no idea what you are
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| No. Then let's do it with a little more lyrix:
|
| Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
| gently down the stream...
Hmm...
row(), row(), row(), this-boat-row()
not a pointer, but a function.
and it is sstream not stream.
--
Lgb
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 21 March 2003 10:42, Juergen Vigna wrote:
| > José Matos wrote:
| > > Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
| >
| > No I meant (raw) "row" pointer
|
| Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
I have no idea what
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > No. Then let's do it with a little more lyrix:
| >
| > Row *, Row *, Row * your boat
| > gently down the ...
Hmm...
row(), row(), row(), this->boat->row()
not a pointer, but a function.
and it is not .
--
Lgb
John Levon wrote:
Can somebody give me a brief summary of how/why this works ?
Especially, why can't we reinitLyXText when lt is non-null ?
Because it might be we are working on Row pointers which would
disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
Jug
--
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:25, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Because it might be we are working on Row pointers which would
disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
Probably you meant raw pointers, no?
In this subject row pointers will probably mean something else. Also I
would
José Matos wrote:
Probably you meant raw pointers, no?
No I meant (raw) row pointer
In this subject row pointers will probably mean something else. Also I
would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...
Did you joke?
Jug
--
José Matos wrote:
Probably you meant raw pointers, no?
In this subject row pointers will probably mean something else. Also I
would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...
Row, row, row your boat
gently down the stream,
merrily merrily merrily,
life is but a dream!
I think he indeed meant
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:42, Juergen Vigna wrote:
José Matos wrote:
Probably you meant raw pointers, no?
No I meant (raw) row pointer
Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
In this subject row pointers will probably mean something else. Also
I would
José Matos wrote:
eye so now I have decided to pick another victim. And my post was able to
put Alfredo singing, even on a friday, someone should tell him what
happens when people sing on this list on fridays.
http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3
Bah, you are just plain annoying,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:31AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Because it might be we are working on Row pointers which would
disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
Yep, gotcha. I finally got minipage working simply by forcing a rebreak
on the lyxtext. Not polite or
On Friday 21 March 2003 13:24, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3
Bah, you are just plain annoying, and too ignorant to apreciate fine
poetry. (Is that friday enough?)
My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
lyrix and
On Friday 21 March 2003 15:18, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
José Matos wrote:
My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
lyrix and then evolve to lyx). Just because today we are entering in
spring that doesn't mean you should start imitating the little birds.
John Levon wrote:
Can somebody give me a brief summary of how/why this works ?
Especially, why can't we "reinitLyXText" when lt is non-null ?
Because it might be we are working on "Row" pointers which would
disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
Jug
--
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:25, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Because it might be we are working on "Row" pointers which would
> disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also
José Matos wrote:
Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
No I meant (raw) "row" pointer
In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also I
would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...
Did you joke?
Jug
--
José Matos wrote:
> Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
> In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else. Also I
> would not have pointed if it wasn't friday...
Row, row, row your boat
gently down the stream,
merrily merrily merrily,
life is but a dream!
I think he indeed
On Friday 21 March 2003 10:42, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > Probably you meant "raw" pointers, no?
>
> No I meant (raw) "row" pointer
Oh, I see, and Lars knows it? If he knows he is loosing qualities.
> > In this subject "row" pointers will probably mean something else.
José Matos wrote:
> eye so now I have decided to pick another victim. And my post was able to
> put Alfredo singing, even on a friday, someone should tell him what
> happens when people sing on this list on fridays.
>
> http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3
Bah, you are just plain
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:25:31AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Because it might be we are working on "Row" pointers which would
> disapear or be invalidated by the reinit, don't you think so?
Yep, gotcha. I finally got minipage working simply by forcing a rebreak
on the lyxtext. Not polite or
On Friday 21 March 2003 13:24, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> >
> > http://www.lyx.org/news/2726.php3#item3
>
> Bah, you are just plain annoying, and too ignorant to apreciate fine
> poetry. (Is that friday enough?)
My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
José Matos wrote:
> My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
> lyrix and then evolve to lyx). Just because today we are entering in
> spring that doesn't mean you should start imitating the little birds. (Now
Well, we are certainly not entering spring in my
On Friday 21 March 2003 15:18, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > My problem is with you singing not with the lyrics (yes, this should be
> > lyrix and then evolve to lyx). Just because today we are entering in
> > spring that doesn't mean you should start imitating the little
Can somebody give me a brief summary of how/why this works ?
Especially, why can't we reinitLyXText when lt is non-null ?
thanks
john
Can somebody give me a brief summary of how/why this works ?
Especially, why can't we "reinitLyXText" when lt is non-null ?
thanks
john
29 matches
Mail list logo
