Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for those also. Let me know if others would want this change. If we did that though, we might want to change the menus to use toggling also

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 um 01:09:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 11:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Is it possible to close the outline? It would be nice if ESC did this. Currently ESC puts the cursor back in the workarea which is a nice function, but TAB can already be used for this. Yes, I think that Esc should do it. OTOH, wouldn't it be

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 11:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Ah, I see what you mean. I will revert, and mark #8388 as 'wontfix' unless there are objections. It does not seem useful to have two such close bindings. Yes, I think this is the best we can do right now. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400 toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388) Toggling is more intuitive for this dialog. There is one

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400 toc bind: 'dialog-show' -

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 21/05/2015 11:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Ah, I see what you mean. I will revert, and mark #8388 as 'wontfix' unless there are objections. It does not seem useful to have two such close bindings. Yes, I

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 21/05/2015 11:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Is it possible to close the outline? It would be nice if ESC did this. Currently ESC puts the cursor back in the workarea which is a nice function, but TAB can

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for those also. Let me know if others would want this

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check dialogs. Toggling

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015 um 01:09:57, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c > > Author: Scott Kostyshak > > Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for those also. Let me know if others would want this change. If we did that though, we might want to change the menus to use toggling also

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c Author: Scott Kostyshak Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400 toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388) Toggling is more intuitive for this dialog. There is

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >> commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c >> Author: Scott Kostyshak >> Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400 >> >> toc bind:

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> Le 21/05/2015 07:08, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> >>> commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c >>> Author: Scott Kostyshak

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 11:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Is it possible to close the outline? It would be nice if ESC did this. Currently ESC puts the cursor back in the workarea which is a nice function, but TAB can already be used for this. Yes, I think that Esc should do it. OTOH, wouldn't it be

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

Le 21/05/2015 11:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Ah, I see what you mean. I will revert, and mark #8388 as 'wontfix' unless there are objections. It does not seem useful to have two such close bindings. Yes, I think this is the best we can do right now. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/05/2015 11:20, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >> Is it possible to close the outline? It would be nice if ESC did this. >> Currently ESC puts the cursor back in the workarea which is a nice >> function, but TAB

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/05/2015 11:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >> Ah, I see what you mean. I will revert, and mark #8388 as 'wontfix' >> unless there are objections. It does not seem useful to have two such >> close bindings. >

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> >> We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check >> dialogs. Toggling seems more intuitive to me for those also. Let me >> know if others would

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> Le 21/05/2015 07:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> >>> We could also do this for the advanced find and the spell check >>>

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c Author: Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400 toc bind: 'dialog-show' - 'dialog-toggle' (#8388) Toggling is more intuitive for

Re: [LyX/master] toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > commit bede4d320bfff26fcbea396b516b92eb9595940c > Author: Scott Kostyshak > Date: Thu May 21 00:59:08 2015 -0400 > > toc bind: 'dialog-show' -> 'dialog-toggle' (#8388) > > Toggling is more

Re: Master TOC

"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amir Of course, one's work is never done. For example, why don't we Amir have fr_TOC.lyx? Yes, why? Amir OTOH, french only has 3 doc files (what are you guys waiting for?) I don't know, they may have a thesis to write. Amir Would you want to

Re: master TOC

"Mike" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike Infidels! :-) Actually, just remember that my version was to Mike stimulate action to do a better one. I certainly don't want to Mike edit it by hand every time there is a minor doc change. I Mike haven't had a chance to look at Amir's version since I

Re: master TOC

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Since we will ask people to update po-files after 1.1.5pre, it should | at least have the right texts. btw. could you change your change to read "Graphics" instead of "Graphic" Lgb

Re: Master TOC

> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> Of course, one's work is never done. For example, why don't we Amir> have fr_TOC.lyx? Yes, why? Amir> OTOH, french only has 3 doc files (what are you guys waiting for?) I don't know, they may have a thesis to write. Amir> Would

Re: master TOC

> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> Infidels! :-) Actually, just remember that my version was to Mike> stimulate action to do a better one. I certainly don't want to Mike> edit it by hand every time there is a minor doc change. I Mike> haven't had a chance to look at Amir's

Re: master TOC

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Since we will ask people to update po-files after 1.1.5pre, it should | at least have the right texts. btw. could you change your change to read "Graphics" instead of "Graphic" Lgb

Master TOC in 1.1.5cvs

Guys I noticed the new Master TOC in the 1.1.5cvs. I think it's an excellent addition as it will certainly make finding what you want in the docs much quicker. Maybe this should be put at the very top of the drop down menu? Also I noticed it doesn't cope well when the text in the titles

Re: master TOC

"Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amir Speaking of which, which version of the master TOC is going to Amir be included in the 1.1.5 prerelease? Guess which one I'll vote Amir for? :) I took a look at both, and indeed yours is better IMO. So, unless Mike disagrees

Master TOC

OK. I checked the new TOC.lyx in. Hopefully Mike won't get angry. But hey, it's almost Friday anyway. I also checked in Doc_toc.pl, which is the (slightly more than 5-line) script that creates TOC.lyx. Lars, all you need to do is "Doc_toc.pl TOC.lyx" before you move the lyxdoc module into

Re: master TOC

On 13 Apr 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Amir" == Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Amir Speaking of which, which version of the master TOC is going to Amir be included in the 1.1.5 prerelease? Guess which one I'll vote Amir for? :) I took a look at both, and in

Master TOC in 1.1.5cvs

Guys I noticed the new Master TOC in the 1.1.5cvs. I think it's an excellent addition as it will certainly make finding what you want in the docs much quicker. Maybe this should be put at the very top of the drop down menu? Also I noticed it doesn't cope well when the text in the titles

Re: master TOC

>>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> Speaking of which, which version of the master TOC is going to Amir> be included in the 1.1.5 prerelease? Guess which one I'll vote Amir> for? :) I took a look at both, and indeed yours

Master TOC

OK. I checked the new TOC.lyx in. Hopefully Mike won't get angry. But hey, it's almost Friday anyway. I also checked in Doc_toc.pl, which is the (slightly more than 5-line) script that creates TOC.lyx. Lars, all you need to do is "Doc_toc.pl > TOC.lyx" before you move the lyxdoc module into

Re: master TOC

On 13 Apr 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Amir> Speaking of which, which version of the master TOC is going to > Amir> be included in the 1.1.5 prerelease? Guess which one I'l

Re: Master TOC and trivial changes patch (included)

"Mike" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike Oops. I didn't even think about looking at LaTeXConfig. Thanks Mike for your efforts in cleaning this up. This is why I write docs, Mike not code :-) So, where is the LaTeXConfig entry? ;) BTW, if you feel like rewriting (part of) LaTeXConfig, feel

master TOC

Sorry I'm not replying to the actual message, but that's more complicated to do when you're reading messages via the digest. Anyway, JMarc, the master TOC will on the contrary be very useful when you haven't printed out the docs, because the section numbers are listed. Frankly, I find it hard

Re: Master TOC and trivial changes patch (included)

> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> Oops. I didn't even think about looking at LaTeXConfig. Thanks Mike> for your efforts in cleaning this up. This is why I write docs, Mike> not code :-) So, where is the LaTeXConfig entry? ;) BTW, if you feel like rewriting (part of)

master TOC

Sorry I'm not replying to the actual message, but that's more complicated to do when you're reading messages via the digest. Anyway, JMarc, the master TOC will on the contrary be very useful when you haven't printed out the docs, because the section numbers are listed. Frankly, I find it hard

Re: Master TOC and trivial changes patch (included)

"Mike" == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike I've also attached a patch against 1.1.4fix2 which addresses Mike some of the "trivial changes" I proposed last week. OK I've applied it. It would have been better to have (1) a "diff -ur" patch, because it's more readable and (2) a ChangeLog entry,

Re: Master TOC and trivial changes patch (included)

On 11 Apr 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Mike I've also attached a patch against 1.1.4fix2 which addresses Mike some of the "trivial changes" I proposed last week. OK I've applied it. It would have been better to have (1) a "diff -ur" patch, because it's more readable and (2) a ChangeLog

Re: Master TOC and trivial changes patch (included)

> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> I've also attached a patch against 1.1.4fix2 which addresses Mike> some of the "trivial changes" I proposed last week. OK I've applied it. It would have been better to have (1) a "diff -ur" patch, because it's more readable and (2) a ChangeLog

Re: Master TOC and trivial changes patch (included)

On 11 Apr 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Mike> I've also attached a patch against 1.1.4fix2 which addresses > Mike> some of the "trivial changes" I proposed last week. > > OK I've applied it. It would have been better to have (1) a "diff -ur" > patch, because it's more readable and (2) a

Master TOC

I've commited a Master Table of Contents to the lyxdoc repository (TOC.lyx) along with the shell script that got me 98% of the way there. (As an exercize for Amir, rewrite it with 5 lines of Perl code ...). Let me know if you like it. I don't really understand why you used that instead of

Re: Master TOC

On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Amir Karger wrote: So, for your reading pleasure, I'm attaching doc_toc.pl and toc.lyx. doc_toc.pl is 107 lines. If I got rid of the comments and whitespace, I could shrink it, though to get it to five lines they would have to be really long lines :) I'm attaching it so we

Re: Master TOC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now we just need to get LyX to support \dotfill in addition to \hfill. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't we just generalize that to fill with x. Garst

Re: Master TOC

On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now we just need to get LyX to support \dotfill in addition to \hfill. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't we just generalize that to fill with x.

Re: Master TOC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now we just need to get LyX to support \dotfill in addition to \hfill. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't we just generalize that to fill with x.

Master TOC

> I've commited a Master Table of Contents to the lyxdoc repository > (TOC.lyx) along with the shell script that got me 98% of the way there. > (As an exercize for Amir, rewrite it with 5 lines of Perl code ...). Let > me know if you like it. I don't really understand why you used that instead

Re: Master TOC

On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Amir Karger wrote: > So, for your reading pleasure, I'm attaching doc_toc.pl and toc.lyx. > doc_toc.pl is 107 lines. If I got rid of the comments and whitespace, I > could shrink it, though to get it to five lines they would have to be really > long lines :) I'm attaching it

Re: Master TOC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now we just need to get LyX to support \dotfill in addition to \hfill. > > Mike > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't we just generalize that to fill with x. Garst

Re: Master TOC

On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Now we just need to get LyX to support \dotfill in addition to \hfill. > > > > Mike > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Can't we just generalize that to fill with x. > > >

Re: Master TOC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Now we just need to get LyX to support \dotfill in addition to \hfill. > > > > > > Mike > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Can't we just generalize that to fill with x. > > > >