Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-12-09 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear Uwe, On 2015-11-24, Uwe Stöhr wrote: ... > All manuals are designed to be exported as PDF (pdflatex). I could also > add a note to make this clear. I propose to set the "default_output_format" to pdf2 (pdflatex). This not only makes this clear, it also uses pdflatex as export route when

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-12-09 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 09.12.2015 um 09:01 schrieb Guenter Milde: Dear Uwe, Hi Günter, please CC me if things are specially addressed to me. I only have access to the list at home and often miss some messages in the amount of posts there. I propose to set the "default_output_format" to pdf2 (pdflatex).

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-11-24 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 22.11.2015 um 22:59 schrieb Guenter Milde: My intention was not to separate this. chemical equations are formulas nevertheless. They are formulas, but not mathematical ones, so I would rather place this in "specific manuals > Chemical Formulas". Is this really necessary? One more file

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-11-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 20.11.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Guenter Milde: Well, I not only discovered this bug in LyX, but also fixed it in a series of commits. The current LyX-dev: * writes \usepackage[latin9]{luainputenc} with LuaTeX, and * uses ASCII encoding and no inputenc with XeTeX. Thanks Günter, I was using

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-11-22 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-11-22, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 20.11.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Guenter Milde: Dear Uwe, >> * LuaTeX and TeX fonts: compiling error: >> The first message points to chemgreek.sty: >>. Defining command \selectchemgreekmapping with sig. 'm' on line 485. >>

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-11-20 Thread Georg Baum
Guenter Milde wrote: > Maybe we can describe mhchem in a separate document? After all it uses > "mathed" but is not about Mathematics. This is a very good idea (even wthout thinking of the tests). Georg

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-11-19 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 29.10.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Guenter Milde: documents that use the mhchem package (which is automatically loaded if required, by default) fail to compile with XeTeX or LuaTeX and TeX fonts. I think you discovered a bug in LyX: We automatically load inputenc: \usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-11-19 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear Uwe, On 2015-11-20, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.10.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Guenter Milde: >> documents that use the mhchem package (which is automatically loaded if >> required, by default) fail to compile with XeTeX or LuaTeX and TeX fonts. > I think you discovered a bug in LyX: > We

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-10-30 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2015-10-30, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:15:20PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> Dear LyXers, >> documents that use the mhchem package (which is automatically loaded if >> required, by default) fail to compile with XeTeX or LuaTeX and TeX fonts. Actually, a minimal

mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-10-29 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear LyXers, documents that use the mhchem package (which is automatically loaded if required, by default) fail to compile with XeTeX or LuaTeX and TeX fonts. The Math.lyx manual also shows missing or non-transformed output if used with XeTeX/LuaTeX and non-TeX fonts. Is there a way to make LyX

Re: mhchem and Xe/LuaTeX problems

2015-10-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:15:20PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear LyXers, > > documents that use the mhchem package (which is automatically loaded if > required, by default) fail to compile with XeTeX or LuaTeX and TeX fonts. > > The Math.lyx manual also shows missing or non-transformed