On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:20:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
> | > | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
> | > | anyway...)
> | >
> |
> I'm an agnostic here, but I just don't see where to put my [in]equality
> type operator without a middle column . . .
Looks like it goes to the right column. Which looks ugly if operators in
different lines are of different size as some people pointed out.
On the other hand, if they are of th
Andre admitted,
> I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t e and
> align by M-m t a ('t' like 'type') with entrys for both in the menus.
> But I don't know anything about the concerned religions so maybe this would
> be Wrong.
I'm an agnostic here, but I just don't see
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> amslatex is not amsmath! amsmath is in
Herbert> /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/amsmath/
So, what is in amslatex/math/ on CTAN? I'm not discussing teTeX
hierarchy, but CTAN.
JMarc
On 23 May 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> total 20
> drwxr-xr-x 4 289 120 512 Apr 6 2000 amslatex
> drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 3072 Apr 15 06:52 babel
> drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 512 Aug 31 2000 cyrillic
> drwxr-xr-x 2 289 120 512 Aug 31
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into
>> \eqnarray | (Not that I know where to find this kind of
>> information, but | anyway...)
>>
>> I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
>> f
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
| > | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
| > | anyway...)
| >
| > I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
| > features.
|
> | If ams is selected, Ctrl-Enter splits into \align, otherwise into \eqnarray
> | (Not that I know where to find this kind of information, but
> | anyway...)
>
> I'd rather remove that button, and just require ams for certain
> features.
Ok.. which goes back to the original question: Can we as
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > remember that there is a button "use amsmath" in layout->document->extra
| > ;-)
|
| To be honest, I have not used anything from the menus except the file
| menu since 1.0.4 or so
|
| > from my point of view this should be important! with this optio
> remember that there is a button "use amsmath" in layout->document->extra
> ;-)
To be honest, I have not used anything from the menus except the file
menu since 1.0.4 or so
> from my point of view this should be important! with this option all
> the ams-mathstuff can be used and otherwise not (
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > (2) Most users just don't know about amsmath and what it does. For
> > example, in normal latex, if you have a numbered equation that is too
> > wide, the equation will overwrite the equation number. However, if you
> > include amsmath, the equation number will be mov
> (2) Most users just don't know about amsmath and what it does. For
> example, in normal latex, if you have a numbered equation that is too
> wide, the equation will overwrite the equation number. However, if you
> include amsmath, the equation number will be moved down. So it could be
> argue
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:53:29AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > I think that the improvement you gain by using align (e.g. no ugly spaces)
> > justifies to make it the default. In my opinion, people should use align
> > instead of eqnarray. If we change C-return to create an eqnarray,
> > most u
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Andre> Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
> >
> > Yes, probably...
> >
> > Andre> I think in the end we can
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:02:43AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
>
> Yes, probably...
>
> Andre> I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Maybe the both of you could work out some kind of consensus.
Yes, probably...
Andre> I think in the end we can have both, getting eqnarray by M-m t
Andre> e and align by M-m t a ('t' like 'type') with entrys for both
Andre> in th
> Dekel> This is intentional: LyX now uses the align env. instead of
> Dekel> eqnarray. If you want eqnarray, use Edit->Math->Make eqnarray.
> Dekel> It is also possible to return to previous behavior by putting
> Dekel> bind "C-Return" "break-line e" in your bind file.
>
> As was said before, I
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins
Dekel> wrote:
>> I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a
>> 2x3 multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
>>
>> Is this a side ef
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:41:47PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a 2x3
> multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
>
> Is this a side effect, or is this the way it's syupposed to be?
This is intentional: Ly
I seem to get a 2x2 equation array (whatever that is) instead of a 2x3
multiline equation when using ctrl-enter in an equation.
Is this a side effect, or is this the way it's syupposed to be?
hawk
20 matches
Mail list logo