Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you make a python script that works sort of like what
autotools does and could be called by both scons and auto*? We do
not want two different code bases for that. And relying on file
lists, while a good idea in general, seems fragile in our
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could you make a python script that works sort of like what
>> autotools does and could be called by both scons and auto*? We do
>> not want two different code bases for that. And relying on file
>> lists, while a good idea in general, seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: schmitt
Date: Tue May 1 11:28:19 2007
New Revision: 18145
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18145
Log:
* po/*.po:
* po/POTFILES.in: another giant po files update;
hopefully, the messages, the source files, and the order, in which
A lot of po file noise was caused by changing the order in which the
messages are extracted from the source files (i.e. the order in which
the source files were processed).
I do hope that this order is the same for the scons and automake build
process. Otherwise, we will see a lot of other giant
Bo Peng schrieb:
The generated po files are different in many places like:
2924c2924
#: lib/layouts/scrlttr2.layout:207 lib/layouts/amsdefs.inc:186
---
#: lib/layouts/amsdefs.inc:186 lib/layouts/scrlttr2.layout:207
which reflect the order in which inc and layout etc are processed, I
am
However, if auto* creates
the po file differently, this will lead to a lot of confusion and
frustration (at least for those with a slow internet connection :-) )
For example, one of the problems is that
autotools:
layouts_l10n.pot: $(top_srcdir)/lib/layouts/*.layout
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo I guess I have to change scons to make autotools happy.
Could you make a python script that works sort of like what autotools
does and could be called by both scons and auto*? We do not want two
different code bases for that. And relying on file lists,
Could you make a python script that works sort of like what autotools
does and could be called by both scons and auto*? We do not want two
different code bases for that. And relying on file lists, while a good
idea in general, seems fragile in our case, unless scons and autotools
manage to share
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: schmitt
Date: Tue May 1 11:28:19 2007
New Revision: 18145
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18145
Log:
* po/*.po:
* po/POTFILES.in: another giant po files update;
hopefully, the messages, the source files, and the order, in which
A lot of po file noise was caused by changing the order in which the
messages are extracted from the source files (i.e. the order in which
the source files were processed).
I do hope that this order is the same for the scons and automake build
process. Otherwise, we will see a lot of other giant
Bo Peng schrieb:
The generated po files are different in many places like:
2924c2924
< #: lib/layouts/scrlttr2.layout:207 lib/layouts/amsdefs.inc:186
---
#: lib/layouts/amsdefs.inc:186 lib/layouts/scrlttr2.layout:207
which reflect the order in which inc and layout etc are processed, I
am
However, if auto* creates
the po file differently, this will lead to a lot of confusion and
frustration (at least for those with a slow internet connection :-) )
For example, one of the problems is that
autotools:
layouts_l10n.pot: $(top_srcdir)/lib/layouts/*.layout
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> I guess I have to change scons to make autotools happy.
Could you make a python script that works sort of like what autotools
does and could be called by both scons and auto*? We do not want two
different code bases for that. And relying on
Could you make a python script that works sort of like what autotools
does and could be called by both scons and auto*? We do not want two
different code bases for that. And relying on file lists, while a good
idea in general, seems fragile in our case, unless scons and autotools
manage to share
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removed files:
lyx-devel/src/frontends/controllers/: ControlButtons.C
ControlButtons.h
ControlConnections.C
ControlConnections.h
ControlDialog.h
ControlDialog.tmpl
ControlDialog_impl.C
ControlDialog_impl.h GUI.h
ViewBase.C ViewBase.h
.)
$ diffstat dialogs.diff
po/POTFILES.in |5
src/frontends/Dialogs.C| 10
src/frontends/Dialogs.h| 14
src/frontends/controllers/ControlButtons.C | 84 -
src/frontends/controllers/ControlButtons.h
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Log message:
Remove all the cruft needed by the original MVC dialog code.
Hurra!
Indeed. Now I'm off to bed to dream of things other than Graphical
User Interface Independence or Model-View-Controller splits. I feel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Removed files:
> lyx-devel/src/frontends/controllers/: ControlButtons.C
> ControlButtons.h
> ControlConnections.C
> ControlConnections.h
> ControlDialog.h
> ControlDialog.tmpl
> ControlDialog_impl.C
> ControlDialog_impl.h GUI.h
> ViewBase.C ViewBase.h
>
n 2001.)
$ diffstat dialogs.diff
po/POTFILES.in |5
src/frontends/Dialogs.C| 10
src/frontends/Dialogs.h| 14
src/frontends/controllers/ControlButtons.C | 84 -
src/frontends/controllers/ControlBut
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Log message:
>> Remove all the cruft needed by the original MVC dialog code.
>
> Hurra!
Indeed. Now I'm off to bed to dream of things other than Graphical
User Interface Independence or Model-View-Controller splits. I feel
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:04:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
Fixed the selection problem for insettext/insettabular John reported
(as promised ;)
thanks
john
--
Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels.
- Jonathan S.
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:04:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message: Fixed the selection problem for insettext/insettabular
John reported (as promised ;)
John thanks
Does this apply to 1.2.x too?
JMarc
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Does this apply to 1.2.x too?
No, it was a regression
regards
john
--
Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels.
- Jonathan S. Shapiro
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:04:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> Fixed the selection problem for insettext/insettabular John reported
> (as promised ;)
thanks
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels."
- Jonathan S.
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 10:04:23AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Log message: Fixed the selection problem for insettext/insettabular
>> John reported (as promised ;)
John> thanks
Does this apply to 1.2.x too?
JMarc
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Does this apply to 1.2.x too?
No, it was a regression
regards
john
--
"Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels."
- Jonathan S. Shapiro
POTFILES.in-t \
mv POTFILES.in-t POTFILES.in
[...]
So I generate my own po/POTFILES.in!
Why do we then also have po/POTFILES.in on CVS?
When updating from CVS, I mostly get the message that there are
conflicts merging po/POTFILES.in.
BTW: couldn't a lot (if not all) of the intl/ and po/ go if we
t; POTFILES.in-t \
&& echo "src/ext_l10n.h" >> POTFILES.in-t \
&& mv POTFILES.in-t POTFILES.in
[...]
So I generate my own po/POTFILES.in!
Why do we then also have po/POTFILES.in on CVS?
When updating from CVS, I mostly get the message that there are
conflicts mergin
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 2:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
fix bug 568
Jean-Marc, this fixes the senseless bit but the figure still doesn't show
up in the Navigate menu. Presumably because that code iterates only over
outermost insets.
Angus
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Tuesday 20 August 2002 2:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message: fix bug 568
Angus Jean-Marc, this fixes the senseless bit but the figure still
Angus doesn't show up in the Navigate menu. Presumably because that
Angus code
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 2:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log message:
> fix bug 568
Jean-Marc, this fixes the "senseless" bit but the figure still doesn't show
up in the Navigate menu. Presumably because that code iterates only over
outermost insets.
Angus
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Tuesday 20 August 2002 2:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Log message: fix bug 568
Angus> Jean-Marc, this fixes the "senseless" bit but the figure still
Angus> doesn't show up in the Navigate menu. Presumably because that
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
Again, I see no need for lyx.pot or POTFILES* to be in CVS. Please
enlighten me if I've missed something.
(Although as I said in my last email srcdir!=builddir is now getting
to be a problem because the generated form_*.[Ch] files are in
builddir
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> Again, I see no need for lyx.pot or POTFILES* to be in CVS. Please
> enlighten me if I've missed something.
>
> (Although as I said in my last email srcdir!=builddir is now getting
> to be a problem because the generated form_*.[Ch] files are in
>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
| download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
| that. So the dist is the only place we need to ensure we have a
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
> | download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
> | that. So the dist is the only place we need to ensure we
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [...]
So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| _Or_ not have it in CVS.
That is the worst option since we will have a _very_ hard time to get
a updated
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
| download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
| that. So the dist is the only place we need to ensure we have a
| correct copy of POTFILES* and lyx.pot (no need for
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| [...]
>> >> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
>> >> use the same sorting
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >> | _Or_ not have it in CVS.
> >>
> >> That is the worst option since we will have a _very_ hard
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| They don't need to make a dist. Translaters are usually asked to
| download a prelease (ie. a dist) and provide updated translations from
| that. So the dist is the only place we need to ensure we have a
| correct copy of POTFILES* and lyx.pot (no need
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
| pretty useless as
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
>> >>
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
> >> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
> >> use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
| pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
_what_ changes in it?
| See attachment.
So the
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
genereated, but manually edited/created instead.
So which one is preferable?
Andre'
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
genereated, but manually edited/created
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
To me?
The manually created one, but that has been shot down a number of
times earlier...
Hm... does the order of entries in that file convey any information?
If not, wouldn't it be sufficient just to run 'sort' on
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
To me?
The manually created one, but that has been shot down a number of
times earlier...
| Hm... does the order of entries in that file convey any information?
| If not, wouldn't
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:14:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
we do... and the different sorts, sorts it differently...
(that is where we get the problem...)
What about
... | tr [A-Z] [a-z] | sort
then?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:14:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
we do... and the different sorts, sorts it differently...
(that is where we get the problem...)
| What about
| ... | tr [A-Z] [a-z] | sort
| then?
Does that handle sorting
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Does that handle sorting differences between a, . and _?
Hm. No.
Also we need the correct filename...
Then perhaps
tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort | cut -f 2
should give a good
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre wrote:
Does that handle sorting differences between a, . and _?
Andre Hm. No.
Also we need the correct filename...
Andre Then perhaps
Andre tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz]
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre Then perhaps
Andre tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort |
Andre cut -f 2
Isn't this completely unportable? What an ugly solution...
What's unportable there? I always thought that the text
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre Then perhaps
Andre tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort |
Andre cut -f 2
Isn't this completely unportable? What an ugly solution...
What's unportable there? I always
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
| pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
>> | pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
>>
>> _what_ changes in it?
>
| See attachment.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
> use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
> genereated, but manually edited/created instead.
So which one is preferable?
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:26:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> So the solution is either to make all generations of this document to
>> use the same sorting rules, _or_ to not have this file automatically
>> genereated, but manually
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> To me?
> The manually created one, but that has been shot down a number of
> times earlier...
Hm... does the order of entries in that file convey any information?
If not, wouldn't it be sufficient just to run 'sort' on
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:01:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> To me?
>> The manually created one, but that has been shot down a number of
>> times earlier...
>
| Hm... does the order of entries in that file convey any information?
>
| If not,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:14:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> we do... and the different sorts, sorts it differently...
> (that is where we get the problem...)
What about
... | tr [A-Z] [a-z] | sort
then?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:14:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> we do... and the different sorts, sorts it differently...
>> (that is where we get the problem...)
>
| What about
>
| ... | tr [A-Z] [a-z] | sort
>
| then?
Does that handle
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Does that handle sorting differences between "a", "." and "_"?
Hm. No.
> Also we need the correct filename...
Then perhaps
tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] < POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort | cut -f 2
should give a good
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:29:13AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre> wrote:
>> Does that handle sorting differences between "a", "." and "_"?
Andre> Hm. No.
>> Also we need the correct filename...
Andre> Then perhaps
Andre>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Then perhaps
> Andre> tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] < POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort |
> Andre> cut -f 2
>
> Isn't this completely unportable? What an ugly solution...
What's unportable there? I always thought that
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:22:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>Andre> Then perhaps
>>Andre> tr [A-Z._] [a-zzz] < POTFILES.in | paste - POTFILES.in | sort |
>>Andre> cut -f 2
>>
>>Isn't this completely unportable? What an ugly solution...
>>
>
> What's
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
> >> | pretty useless as a piece of information in a
On Friday 28 June 2002 06:50, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
| pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
_what_ changes in it?
See attachment.
On Friday 28 June 2002 06:50, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be different. It's
> > | pretty useless as a piece of information in a diff.
> >
> > _what_ changes in it?
>
> See
Michael A. Koziarski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
| checkout/autogen/configure
I guess something in it changed then...
| It changes
to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: POTFILES.in
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/po/POTFILES.in,v
retrieving revision 1.279
diff -u -p -r1.279 POTFILES.in
"Michael A. Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
>> | It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
>>| checkout/autogen/configure
>>
>>I guess something in it changed
e up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: POTFILES.in
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/po/POTFILES.in,v
retrieving revision 1.279
diff -u -p -r1.279
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
| checkout/autogen/configure
I guess something in it changed then...
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
| checkout/autogen/configure
I guess something in it changed then...
It changes all the time. Every build it seems to be
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
>
| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
| checkout/autogen/configure
I guess something in it changed then...
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| should this be aded to .cvsignore?
>
>
>| It always shows up in cvs diff, even after a clean
>| checkout/autogen/configure
>
>I guess something in it changed then...
>
>
>
It changes all the time. Every build it
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| The only good arguement I've heard so far is JMarc's about the
| rewritten 0.11 probably doing things differently -- hopefully they'll
| have incorporated something similar into 0.11 so my patch isn't
| necessary.
other argument...
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 03-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
other argument... translators cannot pick up an up to date lyx.pot
anywhare... except from dists.
| You don't answer his real question! Why did you say that his patch has
| consequenses on lyx.pot if it
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | The only good arguement I've heard so far is JMarc's about the
> | rewritten 0.11 probably doing things differently -- hopefully they'll
> | have incorporated something similar into 0.11 so my patch isn't
> | necessary.
>
> other argument...
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 03-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> other argument... translators cannot pick up an up to date lyx.pot
>> anywhare... except from dists.
>
| You don't answer his real question! Why did you say that his patch has
| consequenses on lyx.pot if
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The attached simple patch re-establishes earlier behaviour where
| it was possible to build lyx without a po/POTFILES.in present.
| The trick is to make the newer code in gettext.m4 think that a
| valid po/POTFILES.in exists so it will generate po/Makefile
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars I completely disagree with this since the lyx.pot will be very
Lars out of sync with the reality.
Lars Either we keep it as is, or make the POTFILES.in generation
Lars manual i.e. we add files to it manually.
Either way, we have to
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allan This simple fix doesn't touch gettext.m4 but works with/around
Allan it. As such it should be future proof.
Famous last words. In version 0.11 (to which we will soon switch, I
guess), everything is completely rewritten.
JMarc
than it already is?
In my tree I see:
[rae@galah ~...LyX/lyx-devel] ll po/lyx.pot po/POTFILES.in
8 -rw-r-1 rae rae 6236 Apr 2 14:31 po/POTFILES.in
168 -rw-r--r--1 rae rae167564 Jul 4 2001 po/lyx.pot
In the log entries I see:
revision 1.6
date: 1999/12/21
be any more out of
| sync with reality than it already is?
| In my tree I see:
| [rae@galah ~...LyX/lyx-devel] ll po/lyx.pot po/POTFILES.in
|8 -rw-r-1 rae rae 6236 Apr 2 14:31 po/POTFILES.in
| 168 -rw-r--r--1 rae rae167564 Jul 4 2001 po/lyx.pot
On 03-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
other argument... translators cannot pick up an up to date lyx.pot
anywhare... except from dists.
You don't answer his real question! Why did you say that his patch has
consequenses on lyx.pot if it doesn't have? Did you see something we don't?
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached simple patch re-establishes earlier behaviour where
| it was possible to build lyx without a po/POTFILES.in present.
>
| The trick is to make the newer code in gettext.m4 think that a
| valid po/POTFILES.in exists so it will ge
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I completely disagree with this since the lyx.pot will be very
Lars> out of sync with the reality.
Lars> Either we keep it as is, or make the POTFILES.in generation
Lars> manual i.e. we add files to it manually.
Either way,
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> This simple fix doesn't touch gettext.m4 but works with/around
Allan> it. As such it should be future proof.
Famous last words. In version 0.11 (to which we will soon switch, I
guess), everything is completely rewritten.
JMarc
about? Why would lyx.pot be any more out of
sync with reality than it already is?
In my tree I see:
[rae@galah ~...LyX/lyx-devel]> ll po/lyx.pot po/POTFILES.in
8 -rw-r-----1 rae rae 6236 Apr 2 14:31 po/POTFILES.in
168 -rw-r--r--1 rae rae167564 Jul 4 200
t;> Lars> out of sync with the reality.
>
| What?! What are you on about? Why would lyx.pot be any more out of
| sync with reality than it already is?
>
| In my tree I see:
| [rae@galah ~...LyX/lyx-devel]> ll po/lyx.pot po/POTFILES.in
|8 -rw-r-1 rae rae 6236 Ap
On 03-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> other argument... translators cannot pick up an up to date lyx.pot
> anywhare... except from dists.
You don't answer his real question! Why did you say that his patch has
consequenses on lyx.pot if it doesn't have? Did you see something we don't?
The attached simple patch re-establishes earlier behaviour where
it was possible to build lyx without a po/POTFILES.in present.
The trick is to make the newer code in gettext.m4 think that a
valid po/POTFILES.in exists so it will generate po/Makefile. Then
remove po/POTFILES.in and when you
The attached simple patch re-establishes earlier behaviour where
it was possible to build lyx without a po/POTFILES.in present.
The trick is to make the newer code in gettext.m4 think that a
valid po/POTFILES.in exists so it will generate po/Makefile. Then
remove po/POTFILES.in and when you
Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
very different from the one you lot create).
Angus
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:45:03PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Do we need this file in cvs? I seem to regenerate it on a regular basis (and
then have to through it away and cvs update it because the order here is so
very different from the one you lot create).
go to the archives and search
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
