Uwe == Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think so, too, but some people argued that the commands are too
clumsy.
Uwe Using commands like ''{} instead of \textquotedblleft is clumsy
Uwe and leads to incorrect output.
If I exchange LaTeX files with other people they probably do not want
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think so, too, but some people argued that the commands are too
>> clumsy.
Uwe> Using commands like ''{} instead of \textquotedblleft is clumsy
Uwe> and leads to incorrect output.
If I exchange LaTeX files with other people they
+0x201a , # SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
Uwe, I think the single low 9 quotation mark and the comma are not equal (wrt
kerning).
I'd use \quotesinglbase instead.
You are right. I added this because in the existing unicodesymbols there was ,, instead of
\quotedblbase
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
You are right. I added this because in the existing unicodesymbols there
was ,, instead of \quotedblbase for the DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK.
I think ,, is o.k. (i.e., will be transformed into a double quotation
mark). The single quotation mark difference is visible with
I think ,, is o.k. (i.e., will be transformed into a double quotation
mark).
But \quotedblbase would be safe for every case and document language, so I put
this in.
Could you please fix these two entries for me (0x201e and 0x201a)?
I did this now and added two more symbols.
We are using
>> +0x201a ",""" "" # SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
>
> Uwe, I think the single low 9 quotation mark and the comma are not equal (wrt
> kerning).
> I'd use \quotesinglbase instead.
You are right. I added this because in the existing unicodesymbols there was ",," instead of
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> You are right. I added this because in the existing unicodesymbols there
> was ",," instead of "\quotedblbase" for the DOUBLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK.
I think ",," is o.k. (i.e., will be transformed into a double quotation
mark). The single quotation mark difference is visible
> I think ",," is o.k. (i.e., will be transformed into a double quotation
> mark).
But \quotedblbase would be safe for every case and document language, so I put
this in.
>> Could you please fix these two entries for me (0x201e and 0x201a)?
I did this now and added two more symbols.
>> We
Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+0x201a , # SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
Uwe, I think the single low 9 quotation mark and the comma are not equal (wrt
kerning).
I'd use \quotesinglbase instead.
BTW what about my siggestion for house? Did you have a
Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> +0x201a "," "" "" # SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK
Uwe, I think the single low 9 quotation mark and the comma are not equal (wrt
kerning).
I'd use \quotesinglbase instead.
BTW what about my siggestion for house? Did you
10 matches
Mail list logo
