Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
| USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
|
| Correct.
It is enabled if configure can find the required header file and lib.
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming writes:
| Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
| USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
| Correct.
It is enabled if configure can find the required header file and lib.
Sure.
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:22:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
have lost the count of the required package. I think we
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What is the equivalent of /etc/fstab on cygwin? This information is in
the registry?
There is no /etc/fstab on cygwin and yes, the information is stored
in the registry but you should use mount both to access and modify
it. On
Dear all,
bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
Bo
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What is the equivalent of /etc/fstab on cygwin? This information is in
the registry?
There is no /etc/fstab on cygwin and yes, the information is stored
in the registry but you should use mount
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
Of course, one might argue that the real power of Boost is to enable us to
extend existing functionality for little or no cost. Why should .lyx.bz2 not
work when .lyx.gz does?
There is code
Bo Peng a écrit :
Dear all,
bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
OK but we still need a check for zlib.h...
Abdel.
Of course, one might argue that the real power of Boost is to enable us to
extend existing functionality for little or no cost. Why should .lyx.bz2 not
work when .lyx.gz does?
You are talking about *user* compressed lyx file. I.e., some one get a
lyx file and compress it to .lyx.bz2. I am more
Bo Peng wrote:
You are talking about *user* compressed lyx file. I.e., some one get a
lyx file and compress it to .lyx.bz2. I am more concerned with *lyx*
compressed file with extension .lyx.
Both are the same from a LyX POV, since LyX does not care at all about
extensions.
In this case, we
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are talking about *user* compressed lyx file. I.e., some one get a
lyx file and compress it to .lyx.bz2.
Correct.
I am more concerned with *lyx* compressed file with extension .lyx.
In this case, we do not need two compression formats.
I think that was
I think that was a mis-feature. IMO, .lyx files should be plain text. If you
want compression do it the standard way.
We do not have to tell the user which compression format we use by a
.gz suffix. If someone wants a smaller file (e.g. for emailing), s/he
can go to document-settings (not yet
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am more concerned with *lyx* compressed file with extension .lyx.
| In this case, we do not need two compression formats.
|
| I think that was a mis-feature. IMO, .lyx files should be plain text. If you
| want compression do it the standard way.
I
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Bo Peng a écrit :
| Dear all,
| bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
|
| OK but we still need a check for zlib.h...
We have that check... but as of now it is a bit circumvented.
--
Lgb
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg bz2 gives better compression on average (at a higher CPU cost),
Georg so it might be useful. Anyway, this is not essential: If
Georg somebody finds the time to write a configure test for the bzip2
Georg lib and enables bzip2 compression if it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Georg bz2 gives better compression on average (at a higher CPU cost),
| Georg so it might be useful. Anyway, this is not essential: If
| Georg somebody finds the time to write a configure test for
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars |
Lars | Georg bz2 gives better compression on average (at a higher
Lars CPU cost), | Georg so it might be useful. Anyway, this is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We do not want one LyX version to produce files another one will not
read...
Yes indeed, the file format sherrif in me must have been sleeping.
Georg
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What is the equivalent of /etc/fstab on cygwin? This information is in
the registry?
There is no /etc/fstab on cygwin
Thanks for these information Enrico. I know that I am such a lazy
bastard and I could have found them by myself.
It just happened to me that I keep all installed cygwin package in a
separate directory (I never use install from the internet) so I could as
well provide this set of package and
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 05:45:20PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Thanks for these information Enrico. I know that I am such a lazy
bastard and I could have found them by myself.
You're welcome. I had that info at hand, so I didn't the work for you ;-)
It just happened to me that I keep
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
| > USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
|
| Correct.
It is enabled if configure can find the required header file and lib.
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming writes:
> | Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
> | > USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
> | Correct.
> It is enabled if configure can find the required header file and lib.
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:22:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
have lost the count of the required package. I think we
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> What is the equivalent of /etc/fstab on cygwin? This information is in
> the registry?
There is no /etc/fstab on cygwin and yes, the information is stored
in the registry but you should use "mount" both to access and modify
Dear all,
bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
Bo
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What is the equivalent of /etc/fstab on cygwin? This information is in
the registry?
There is no /etc/fstab on cygwin and yes, the information is stored
in the registry but you should use "mount"
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
Of course, one might argue that the real power of Boost is to enable us to
extend existing functionality for little or no cost. Why should .lyx.bz2 not
work when .lyx.gz does?
There is
Bo Peng a écrit :
Dear all,
bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
OK but we still need a check for "zlib.h"...
Abdel.
> Of course, one might argue that the real power of Boost is to enable us to
> extend existing functionality for little or no cost. Why should .lyx.bz2 not
> work when .lyx.gz does?
You are talking about *user* compressed lyx file. I.e., some one get a
lyx file and compress it to .lyx.bz2. I am
Bo Peng wrote:
> You are talking about *user* compressed lyx file. I.e., some one get a
> lyx file and compress it to .lyx.bz2. I am more concerned with *lyx*
> compressed file with extension .lyx.
Both are the same from a LyX POV, since LyX does not care at all about
extensions.
> In this
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are talking about *user* compressed lyx file. I.e., some one get a
> lyx file and compress it to .lyx.bz2.
Correct.
> I am more concerned with *lyx* compressed file with extension .lyx.
> In this case, we do not need two compression formats.
I think
> I think that was a mis-feature. IMO, .lyx files should be plain text. If you
> want compression do it the standard way.
We do not have to tell the user which compression format we use by a
.gz suffix. If someone wants a smaller file (e.g. for emailing), s/he
can go to document->settings (not
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I am more concerned with *lyx* compressed file with extension .lyx.
| > In this case, we do not need two compression formats.
|
| I think that was a mis-feature. IMO, .lyx files should be plain text. If you
| want compression do it the standard way.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bo Peng a écrit :
| > Dear all,
| > bzip2.cpp has been removed, so we have one less thing to worry about.
|
| OK but we still need a check for "zlib.h"...
We have that check... but as of now it is a bit circumvented.
--
Lgb
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> bz2 gives better compression on average (at a higher CPU cost),
Georg> so it might be useful. Anyway, this is not essential: If
Georg> somebody finds the time to write a configure test for the bzip2
Georg> lib and enables bzip2
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Georg> bz2 gives better compression on average (at a higher CPU cost),
| Georg> so it might be useful. Anyway, this is not essential: If
| Georg> somebody finds the time to write a
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >
Lars> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> |
Lars> | Georg> bz2 gives better compression on average (at a higher
Lars> CPU cost), | Georg> so it might
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> We do not want one LyX version to produce files another one will not
> read...
Yes indeed, the file format sherrif in me must have been sleeping.
Georg
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> What is the equivalent of /etc/fstab on cygwin? This information is in
> >> the registry?
> >
> > There is no
Thanks for these information Enrico. I know that I am such a lazy
bastard and I could have found them by myself.
It just happened to me that I keep all installed cygwin package in a
separate directory (I never use install from the internet) so I could as
well provide this set of package and
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 05:45:20PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Thanks for these information Enrico. I know that I am such a lazy
> bastard and I could have found them by myself.
You're welcome. I had that info at hand, so I didn't the work for you ;-)
> It just happened to me that I keep
Anyone else see this?
/bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I. -I../../../../src -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG=config.h
-I../../../../boost -Wextra -Wall -Wall
-Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include -I/cygdrive/d/mingw/include
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
| -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src
| -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG=config.h -I../../../../boost -Wextra -Wall
| -Wall -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include -I/cygdrive/d/mingw/include
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
| -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src
| -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG=config.h -I../../../../boost -Wextra -Wall
| -Wall -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
You don't have the bzip2 dll.
(or the header file to be a bit more precise)
OK, thanks.
I think we can safely remove bzip2.cpp from
boost/libs/iostreams/src/Makefile.am
I don't mind installing it though. Windows developers (yes
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone else see this?
bzip2.cpp:18:56: bzlib.h: No such file or directory
Linux people won't as bzip2 is pretty standard. Looks like someone needs to add
a configure test for bzlib.h.
Ain't writing portable software a pain ? ;-)
Angus
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
have lost the count of the required package. I think we need to prepare
a complete development package for beginners. And Enrico, I know, don't
tell me you don't have that
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
have lost the count of the required package. I think we need to prepare
a complete development package for beginners. And Enrico, I know, don't
tell me
You don't have the bzip2 dll.
(or the header file to be a bit more precise)
I think we can safely remove bzip2.cpp from
boost/libs/iostreams/src/Makefile.am
I do not know if the now-removed gzstream can handle bzip2. For all
our purposes now, zlib.dll is enough so bzip2.cpp should be
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
Correct.
A.
I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
Correct.
So,
1. Can I go ahead and remove bzip2.cpp?
2. Does it make sense to use USE_COMPRSSION around this library? This
is certainly more difficult than excluding gzstream.h/C
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:22:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
have lost the count of the required package. I think we need to prepare
a
Anyone else see this?
/bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I. -I../../../../src -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG=""
-I../../../../boost -Wextra -Wall -Wall
-Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include -I/cygdrive/d/mingw/include
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
| -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src
| -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG="" -I../../../../boost -Wextra -Wall
| -Wall -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include -I/cygdrive/d/mingw/include
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++
| -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src
| -DBOOST_USER_CONFIG="" -I../../../../boost -Wextra -Wall
| -Wall -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
You don't have the bzip2 dll.
(or the header file to be a bit more precise)
OK, thanks.
I think we can safely remove bzip2.cpp from
boost/libs/iostreams/src/Makefile.am
I don't mind installing it though. Windows developers (yes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone else see this?
> bzip2.cpp:18:56: bzlib.h: No such file or directory
Linux people won't as bzip2 is pretty standard. Looks like someone needs to add
a configure test for bzlib.h.
Ain't writing portable software a pain ? ;-)
Angus
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
> have lost the count of the required package. I think we need to prepare
> a complete development package for beginners. And Enrico, I know, don't
> tell me you don't have
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
have lost the count of the required package. I think we need to prepare
a complete development package for beginners. And Enrico, I know, don't
tell me
> You don't have the bzip2 dll.
> (or the header file to be a bit more precise)
>
> I think we can safely remove bzip2.cpp from
> boost/libs/iostreams/src/Makefile.am
I do not know if the now-removed gzstream can handle bzip2. For all
our purposes now, zlib.dll is enough so bzip2.cpp should be
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
> USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
Correct.
A.
> > I am still wondering how zlib was handled with gzstream though. Maybe
> > USE_COMPRESSION was disabled by default?
>
> Correct.
So,
1. Can I go ahead and remove bzip2.cpp?
2. Does it make sense to use USE_COMPRSSION around this library? This
is certainly more difficult than excluding
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 06:22:03PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Angus Leeming a écrit :
> > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> It's becoming harder and harder to become a lyx developer on windows. I
> >> have lost the count of the required package. I think we need to prepare
64 matches
Mail list logo
