This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you
look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do.
Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display
directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be
reloaded. Would such a solution be
Uwe Brauer wrote:
This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you
look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do.
Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display
directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be
reloaded.
Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display
directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be
reloaded. Would such a solution be easier to implement?
Why would anyone want to edit the LyX source (in LyX) ?
Vincent
what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT
and back.
pavel
This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I
once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was
essentially already possible.
Vincent
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT
and back.
pavel
This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I
once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was
essentially already possible.
i
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT
and back.
pavel
This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I
once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was
Guenter Milde wrote:
* Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal
text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT))
not in math inset.
OK, I see 2 advantages:
1. no need to place the cursor or highlight
thats what i call uncomfortable.
pavel
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
* Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal
text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT))
not in math inset.
OK, I see 2 advantages:
1. no need to place the
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
If you're such a power-user that you use it so often that this becomes
uncomfortable, you probably should start to learn how to use the math
inset to do the things you want.
frankly i dont use it at all and the main point was about discoverability
for normal users
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
* Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal
text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT))
not in math inset.
Sorry, then this is a feature request.
OK, I see 2 advantages:
1. no need to
>>
>>
> This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you
> look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do.
Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display
directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be
reloaded. Would such a solution
Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you
>> look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do.
>
> Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display
> directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be
> Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display
> directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be
> reloaded. Would such a solution be easier to implement?
>
Why would anyone want to edit the LyX source (in LyX) ?
Vincent
> what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT
> and back.
>
> pavel
>
This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I
once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was
essentially already possible.
Vincent
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT
> > and back.
> >
> > pavel
> >
>
> This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I
> once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was
> essentially already
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> > what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT
>> > and back.
>> >
>> > pavel
>> >
>> This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I
>> once implemented this, but then disregarded
Guenter Milde wrote:
> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal
> text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT))
not in math inset.
> OK, I see 2 advantages:
>
> 1. no need to place the cursor or highlight
thats what i call uncomfortable.
pavel
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal
>> text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT))
>
> not in math inset.
>
>> OK, I see 2 advantages:
>>
>> 1. no need
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> If you're such a power-user that you use it so often that this becomes
> uncomfortable, you probably should start to learn how to use the math
> inset to do the things you want.
frankly i dont use it at all and the main point was about discoverability
for normal
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal
>> text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT))
> not in math inset.
Sorry, then this is a feature request.
>> OK, I see 2 advantages:
>> 1. no
20 matches
Mail list logo