>> Alejandro Aguilar Sierra writes:
AAS> On 10 Feb 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Joacim is right,
AAS> Juergen rewrote and moved the table stuff to his table inset
AAS> already.
>> Yes, but it has only been moved, not rewritten.
AAS> It seems that you forget that an entirely new
On 10 Feb 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> AAS> Joacim is right, Juergen rewrote and moved the table stuff to
> AAS> his table inset already.
>
> Yes, but it has only been moved, not rewritten.
It seems that you forget that an entirely new *text* inset was wrote to
support it. That's, IMD
>> Alejandro Aguilar Sierra writes:
AAS> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Joacim Persson wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> > BTW, you shold probably keep your patch and the comments you
>> just made > so that we can use them when Juergen comes back. I'm
>> sure tho
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Joacim Persson wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > BTW, you shold probably keep your patch and the comments you just made
> > so that we can use them when Juergen comes back. I'm sure those
> > changes will need to be ported to 1.1.
>
> ...you're j
> "Joacim" == Joacim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joacim> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> BTW, you shold probably keep your patch and the comments you just
>> made so that we can use them when Juergen comes back. I'm sure
>> those changes will need to be ported to 1.
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> BTW, you shold probably keep your patch and the comments you just made
> so that we can use them when Juergen comes back. I'm sure those
> changes will need to be ported to 1.1.
...you're joking, right? ... =8-O
The whole monster should be ditc
> "Joacim" == Joacim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joacim> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It is just that having a correct description of what bugs were
>> fixed is nice for users, especially in a maintenance release. And I
>> am not sure I understand what the actual
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It is just that having a correct description of what bugs were fixed
> is nice for users, especially in a maintenance release. And I am not
> sure I understand what the actual bugs were...
...what makes you think I do? ;)
...let's see...
* cell
> "Joacim" == Joacim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joacim> On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Could you provide entries for CHANGES?
Joacim> Forgot that.
Joacim> How aboout: - Yet more bugfixes for tables (Joacim) ? ...just
Joacim> add something ;)
It is just that ha
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Could you provide entries for CHANGES?
Forgot that.
How aboout:
- Yet more bugfixes for tables (Joacim)
?
...just add something ;)
(this patch was against a clean 1.0.0, cvs doesn't work from inside our
firewalls here -- I have to build a socks
> "Joacim" == Joacim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joacim> Ok, here it is. ... some paranoia checks "(nvcell <
Joacim> numberofcells)" may or may not be necessary (doesn't hurt
Joacim> anyway) There are most likely more bugs in there, but
Joacim> hopefully they're too weird to be noti
Ok, here it is. ... some paranoia checks "(nvcell < numberofcells)" may or
may not be necessary (doesn't hurt anyway)
There are most likely more bugs in there, but hopefully they're too weird
to be noticed right away now =)
Joacim
-
All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy ac
12 matches
Mail list logo
