Re: user auth patches

On Friday 15 June 2007 20:42:58 Peter Kümmel wrote: Sorry, ;) The result of the reply rules: I press reply and choose the mailing list. I think this is part of your secret agenda to push dbus into lyx. ;-) -- José Abílio

Re: user auth patches

On Friday 15 June 2007 20:42:58 Peter Kümmel wrote: > Sorry, ;) The result of the reply rules: I press reply and choose the > mailing list. I think this is part of your secret agenda to push dbus into lyx. ;-) -- José Abílio

Re: user auth patches

Tor Lillqvist wrote: The SID is a structure but there exists a functions for serialization, ConvertSidToStringSid. Therefore a string would be fine, the questions remains if we should use a wchar_t or char? The serialization is always ASCII only, so I don't see any gain in using

Re: user auth patches

Peter Kümmel wrote: Tor Lillqvist wrote: The SID is a structure but there exists a functions for serialization, ConvertSidToStringSid. Therefore a string would be fine, the questions remains if we should use a wchar_t or char? The serialization is always ASCII only, so I don't see

Re: user auth patches

Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > > The SID is a structure but there exists a functions for serialization, > > > ConvertSidToStringSid. Therefore a string would be fine, the questions > > > remains if we should use a wchar_t or char? > > The serialization is always ASCII only, so I don't see any gain

Re: user auth patches

Peter Kümmel wrote: > Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> > > The SID is a structure but there exists a functions for serialization, >> > > ConvertSidToStringSid. Therefore a string would be fine, the questions >> > > remains if we should use a wchar_t or char? >> >> The serialization is always ASCII only,