On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
| have a look at the prefered language
* Amir Karger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010823 07:00]:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:55:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
Just to end this thread, the format is now 2001-08-32
Someone added an extra day to August!
Now all my calenders are wrong!
I'll have to reprogram all my clocks and watches!
Not really.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
> > | have a look at the
* Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010823 07:00]:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > | However I don't care how this is output on
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:55:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
>
> > Just to end this thread, the format is now 2001-08-32
>
> Someone added an extra day to August!
> Now all my calenders are wrong!
> I'll have to reprogram all my clocks and watches!
Not
On 20-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
My point is more if you don't know the standard 2001-08-03 is still
confusing.
IMO it's not confusing this is the only right solution for putting a date.
This way you're able to sort it without problems. I for myself use most
of the time (internally)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
| have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have a list
| of date-formats and output it in
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
| have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have a list
|
i learned in school august, 3rd ... :-)
We used to have summer holidays on August 3rd...
SCNR,
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> My point is more "if you don't know the standard 2001-08-03 is still
> confusing".
IMO it's not confusing this is the only right solution for putting a date.
This way you're able to "sort" it without problems. I for myself use most
of the time
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
> | have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have a list
> | of date-formats and
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | However I don't care how this is output on the web-page (we could maybe
> > | have a look at the prefered language set in the browser and have
> i learned in school august, 3rd ... :-)
We used to have summer holidays on August 3rd...
SCNR,
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
Output looks like:
Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
| Output looks like:
| Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
|
| Why not make it according to international
* Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010820 23:51]:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
Output looks like:
Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03?
I really don't care, I feel that spelling the name
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:43:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Common Lars.
Hmrppf... are you belittling me? ( :-) )
:-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> Output looks like:
> Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03?
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:21:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> | > Output looks like:
> | > Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
> |
> | Why not make it according to
* Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010820 23:51]:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:39:14PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > Output looks like:
> > Page last updated on August 3, 2001.
>
> Why not make it according to international standard: 2001-08-03?
I really don't care, I feel that spelling
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:43:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Common Lars.
>
> Hmrppf... are you belittling me? ( :-) )
>
:-)
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/
22 matches
Mail list logo
