Re: [PATCHES] is there a reason why I should not do that?

On 12/05/2016 11:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Dear all, > > The following pair of patches get rid of the setPosCache and > setDimCache methods that have been added over the years all over the > inset and mathed code. The idea is that these code are not needed, > since the only callers of

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On 05/12/2016 23:44, Scott Kostyshak wrote: With the "Converter Definitions" label now at the same highlight/logical level as "Converter File Cache" and "Security" ones, I think there is no more the confusionabout which options in the dialog are specific to a single converter. I still think it

Re: [patch] remove unsupported encodings

Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2016, 12:28 + schrieb Guenter Milde: > File format change? definitely. > IMV, this cannot be improved with a file format change, hence we > don't > need one. Well, you need at least to replace the removed encodings with something sensible on conversion. Without a file

compilation error with current master

With today's master I get this compilation error: Encoding.cpp D:\LyXGit\Master\src\Encoding.cpp(267): error C3861: 'back_inserter': identifier not found [D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-2015\src\LyX.vcxproj] regards Uwe

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:57:56PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 06/12/2016 20:44, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > From 8f157f2d3beb48ae87f9dcd07d59ee062a7a7da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Tommaso Cucinotta > > > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:31:46 +0100 > > > Subject:

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:37:40PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > Creating a separate prefs tab might be meaningful if we had more security > settings not related exclusively to converters, but keeping things > together within a single converters pane has the advantage of linking > clearly

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:42:31AM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > From 8f157f2d3beb48ae87f9dcd07d59ee062a7a7da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tommaso Cucinotta > Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:31:46 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Converters Prefs UI layout clarification. [...] > -

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:10:52PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:37:40PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > > Creating a separate prefs tab might be meaningful if we had more security > > settings not related exclusively to converters, but keeping things > >

Re: LyX 2.2 slowness

Hi there, I just used LyX 2.2 (from Ubuntu) today to take some notes, and noticed also this terrible slowness on a very small document, without any pane open, just showing up while typing up to a ~3-4 lines paragraph without breaks, with the slowness also just for moving cursor, to the point

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On 06/12/2016 22:57, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: right ... couldn't find a way to restore the shortcut, other than ... rollback :(, and apply a different UI clarification fix, would look like the attached, how would u see that? as we're at it, there was a clash in shortcuts for the new two

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:44:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:53:58AM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > With the "Converter Definitions" label now at the same highlight/logical > > level > > as "Converter File Cache" and "Security" ones, I think there is no

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

Le 06/12/2016 à 14:16, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : I still think it is confusing. What do you think about Guillaume's idea of placing the global options above the converter definitions? Note that the appearance also depends on the used Qt style. In the attached you can see that a frame is

Re: Patch to make it possible to open empty files

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, at 20:54, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/28/2016 07:12 AM, Jan Niklas Hasse wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I've created a patch for ticket #9198 which makes it possible to open empty > > (0 bytes) files: > > > >

Re: LyX and (ancient) Hebrew

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:04:10PM +0200, Guy Rutenberg wrote: > XeTeX is by far the best option today to typeset Hebrew and LyX should > default to it. Culmus-latex and ivritex (the old ways to get Hebrew > working) are no longer actively maintained as they are inferior in almost > any sense. >

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On 06/12/2016 20:44, Enrico Forestieri wrote: From 8f157f2d3beb48ae87f9dcd07d59ee062a7a7da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tommaso Cucinotta Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:31:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Converters Prefs UI layout clarification. [...] - - Converter

Re: LyX 2.2 slowness

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:12:56PM +0100, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Hi there, > > I just used LyX 2.2 (from Ubuntu) today to take some notes, and noticed also > this terrible slowness on a very small document, without any pane open, just > showing up while typing up to a ~3-4 lines paragraph