On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 18:06 -0800, Eric Barkan wrote:
> As a long time user of LyX, I want to thank you all for this awesome
> piece of software. Couldn't live without it!
Thank you. :-)
> I installed lyx-devel-2.4.0~beta2-1 and its dependencies from the
> jamatos copr lyx-devel repository for
I used to be able to test the fusion style with LyX on macOS via the
command:
open LyX-2.4dev.app --args -style fusion
That stopped working when using the development version beta2:
open LyX-2.4-beta2.app --args -style fusion
just shows the normal macOS style.
But when I download the binary
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 08:45 +, José Matos wrote:
> What do you get from Help -> About LyX, in the Version tab you have
> an
> option to "Copy Version Info". In my case I have:
>
> Version 2.4.0-beta2
> (Sunday, 11 December 2022)
FWIW, and unrelated to this case it would be also probably nice
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 08:45:22AM +, José Matos wrote:
> Python detected: python3 -tt
>
> Thinking aloud... here we could also output the Python version, for
> consistency sake...
+1
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 03:44:40PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:46:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 10/01/2023 à 03:42, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > The attached patch works around an AMS book unicode issue, as discussed
> > > here:
> > >
> > >
