Re: Beta plans (again)

Am 03.08.2010 um 00:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 2 août 10 à 20:57, Stephan Witt a écrit : I'm a little bit sorrowful that the native spell checker is not fast enough for continuously checking when doing it word-wise. So we are not ready to switch off aspell :( Currently I have no

Re: [patch] revtex 4.1 support

Julien Rioux wrote: The changes to the latex class are described here: [1]. My question boils down to: does it make sense to ship layouts for RevTeX, RevTeX 4 and RevTeX 4.1 in parallel with LyX? Jürgen

Re: r35040 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yes, but if you find the first solution more readable, you can keep it... (now that I see it, I am not sure that it is much of a gain) After looking at the two versions, I think I prefer the first solution. Jürgen

suggestion about tabs

To increase space for the doc title in tabs, it would be convenient not to display the 'close' button, except while hovering on the tab. P

Re: suggestion about tabs

xPol wrote: To increase space for the doc title in tabs, it would be convenient not to display the 'close' button, except while hovering on the tab. It's not exactly what you want, but you can get rid of the close buttons (in favour of a global one) in Preferences Look Feel User

Re: [patch] revtex 4.1 support

On 03/08/2010 2:50 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: The changes to the latex class are described here: [1]. My question boils down to: does it make sense to ship layouts for RevTeX, RevTeX 4 and RevTeX 4.1 in parallel with LyX? Jürgen revtex4-1.cls is ~10 months old now.

Re: Bug #3221: nameref support

Richard Heck rgheck at comcast.net writes: On 07/16/2010 09:41 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: So let's remove \Nameref support then. Done. The reference to Textual reference plus page is still there today, and creates an error: insets/InsetCommandParams.cpp(256): InsetCommand: Incompatible

Re: r35044 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/insets

rgheck wrote: Author: rgheck Date: Tue Aug 3 17:56:31 2010 New Revision: 35044 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35044 Log: Fix bug #6837. status.16x, please. Jürgen

Re: Beta plans (again)

Le 3 août 10 à 08:15, Stephan Witt a écrit : My build environment boils down to: LDFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 -mmacosx- version-min=10.4 CPPFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 - mmacosx-version-min=10.4 CONFIGURE_OPTIONS=--enable-warnings

Re: Beta plans (again)

Am 03.08.2010 um 21:46 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 3 août 10 à 08:15, Stephan Witt a écrit : My build environment boils down to: LDFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 CPPFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386

spell-check on the fly on Mac OS X (was: Re: Beta plans (again))

The last release I built against 10.5 SDK and used the 10.4 minimum version switch. So the features of 10.5 are available but the check with instancesRespondToSelector cares for 10.4 runtime environment. The defines are to care for 10.4 build environments aka 10.4 SDK. This I got from this

Re: Beta plans (again)

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Since I don't have Tiger myself I couldn't test it and asked on the users list - no answer. Maybe we can drop Tiger support completely... Before dropping it entirely, I'd suggest asking again on the user's list, indicating

Re: Beta plans (again)

Am 03.08.2010 um 00:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 2 août 10 à 20:57, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> I'm a little bit sorrowful that the native spell checker is not fast enough >> for continuously checking when doing it word-wise. >> So we are not ready to switch off aspell :( >> >> Currently

Re: [patch] revtex 4.1 support

Julien Rioux wrote: > The changes to the latex class are described here: [1]. My question boils down to: does it make sense to ship layouts for RevTeX, RevTeX 4 and RevTeX 4.1 in parallel with LyX? Jürgen

Re: r35040 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, but if you find the first solution more readable, you can keep > it... > (now that I see it, I am not sure that it is much of a gain) After looking at the two versions, I think I prefer the first solution. Jürgen

suggestion about tabs

To increase space for the doc title in tabs, it would be convenient not to display the 'close' button, except while hovering on the tab. P

Re: suggestion about tabs

xPol wrote: > To increase space for the doc title in tabs, it would be convenient not > to display the 'close' button, except while hovering on the tab. It's not exactly what you want, but you can get rid of the close buttons (in favour of a global one) in Preferences > Look & Feel > User

Re: [patch] revtex 4.1 support

On 03/08/2010 2:50 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: The changes to the latex class are described here: [1]. My question boils down to: does it make sense to ship layouts for RevTeX, RevTeX 4 and RevTeX 4.1 in parallel with LyX? Jürgen revtex4-1.cls is ~10 months old now.

Re: Bug #3221: nameref support

Richard Heck comcast.net> writes: > > On 07/16/2010 09:41 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > > So let's remove \Nameref support then. > > > Done. The reference to "Textual reference plus " is still there today, and creates an error: insets/InsetCommandParams.cpp(256): InsetCommand: Incompatible

Re: r35044 - lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/insets

rgheck wrote: > Author: rgheck > Date: Tue Aug 3 17:56:31 2010 > New Revision: 35044 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/35044 > > Log: > Fix bug #6837. status.16x, please. Jürgen

Re: Beta plans (again)

Le 3 août 10 à 08:15, Stephan Witt a écrit : My build environment boils down to: LDFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 -mmacosx- version-min=10.4 CPPFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 - mmacosx-version-min=10.4 CONFIGURE_OPTIONS=--enable-warnings

Re: Beta plans (again)

Am 03.08.2010 um 21:46 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 3 août 10 à 08:15, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> My build environment boils down to: >> >> LDFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch i386 >> -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 >> CPPFLAGS=-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk -arch

spell-check on the fly on Mac OS X (was: Re: Beta plans (again))

The last release I built against 10.5 SDK and used the 10.4 minimum version switch. So the features of 10.5 are available but the check with instancesRespondToSelector cares for 10.4 runtime environment. The defines are to care for 10.4 build environments aka 10.4 SDK. This I got from this

Re: Beta plans (again)

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Since I don't have Tiger myself I couldn't test it and asked on the users > list - no answer. > Maybe we can drop Tiger support completely... Before dropping it entirely, I'd suggest asking again on the user's list,