Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 23:48:43, schrieb Kayvan Sylvan
kayvansyl...@gmail.com
When trying to view (pdflatex, or ps2pdf) the output of
lib/doc/Additional.lyx, I get the following error:
! Undefined control sequence.
l.11 \synctex
=-1
The control sequence at the end of
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
What do you prefer?
No hard opinion, but if you are going to ditch it please make sure
that owner_ object is living all the time and does not get invalid for
a critical moment when reloading buffer or so (this kind of robustness
against changes in
Georg Baum wrote:
It was easy to verify that owner_ is always set. I also made it more clear
that it should never change by making it a const member.
I meant that the buffer to which owner_ points to must remain alive.
Quick peek at Buffer.cpp shows it should be fine during reload.
Pavel
The announcement for LyX 2.0.5 appeared today on Macupdate.com. Here is the
description given there:
LyX is a fully fuctional WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean) frontend for
LaTeX wnich allows users with no programming knowledge to get the full benefits
of LaTeX. It differs from products
Jerry wrote:
With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied in
other scenarios to better publicize LyX.
I'm sceptical
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
I noticed that sourceforge had problems so that the bundle installer was not updated. Now it
Am 01.11.2012 01:10, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
I proposed to use Latin Modern fonts in splash.lyx as:
- the default choice of fonts in LyX is bitmap, and ugly
This is not true anymore. Please show me a screenshot where the font look
pixeld in normal magnification.
I most certainly missed
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old version 1 is still at the ftp page:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jerry wrote:
With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied
in other
On 11/13/2012 06:09 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old
Jerry wrote:
Jerry wrote:
With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied
in other scenarios to better publicize
Am Montag, 12. November 2012 um 23:48:43, schrieb Kayvan Sylvan
> When trying to view (pdflatex, or ps2pdf) the output of
> lib/doc/Additional.lyx, I get the following error:
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> l.11 \synctex
> =-1
> The control sequence at
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> What do you prefer?
>
> No hard opinion, but if you are going to ditch it please make sure
> that owner_ object is living all the time and does not get invalid for
> a critical moment when reloading buffer or so (this kind of robustness
> against changes
Georg Baum wrote:
> It was easy to verify that owner_ is always set. I also made it more clear
> that it should never change by making it a const member.
I meant that the buffer to which owner_ points to must remain alive.
Quick peek at Buffer.cpp shows it should be fine during reload.
Pavel
The announcement for LyX 2.0.5 appeared today on Macupdate.com. Here is the
description given there:
"LyX is a fully fuctional WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean) frontend for
LaTeX wnich allows users with no programming knowledge to get the full benefits
of LaTeX. It differs from products
Jerry wrote:
> With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
> sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
> generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied in
> other scenarios to better publicize LyX.
I'm
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
I noticed that sourceforge had problems so that the bundle installer was not updated. Now it
Am 01.11.2012 01:10, schrieb Liviu Andronic:
I proposed to use Latin Modern fonts in splash.lyx as:
- the default choice of fonts in LyX is bitmap, and ugly
This is not true anymore. Please show me a screenshot where the font look
pixeld in normal magnification.
I most certainly missed
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old version 1 is still at the ftp page:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>> With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
>> sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
>> generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied
>>
On 11/13/2012 06:09 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 13.11.2012 19:23, schrieb Richard Heck:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.5/
Please remove the old version LyX-205-1 and replace it with LyX-205-2.
Done.
Hello Richard,
I just noticed that the old
Jerry wrote:
> > Jerry wrote:
> >> With apologies to whoever wrote this description and knowing that I've
> >> sounded a little harsh, maybe it would be a good idea to consider a more
> >> generally appealing description. I suspect that this idea could be applied
> >> in other scenarios to
22 matches
Mail list logo