[PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that it cannot find a dictionary for that specific document language. This makes clear the possibility that there is a dictionary available for the desired language but that the document language is not set correctly. ---

[PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

If the spell checker cannot find a dictionary for the document language, the error directs the user to the appropriate section of the User Guide. --- src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: If the spell checker cannot find a dictionary for the document language, the error directs the user to the appropriate section of the User Guide. --- src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

Le 01/02/2013 13:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Patch 2/2 addresses point 4. What is the policy for directing user's to help in an error message? Should the section number be included (i.e. 6.14 Spell Checking) or since that's fragile should it be excluded? How difficult would that be to have a

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 01/02/2013 13:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Patch 2/2 addresses point 4. What is the policy for directing user's to help in an error message? Should the section number be included (i.e. 6.14 Spell Checking) or

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

Le 01/02/2013 13:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I like this idea. Also, the use of labels would make things robust. This might also force us to figure out where the documentation has holes. If there is a non-obvious error and we can't find a place in the docs to point a user to, then this is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 01/02/2013 13:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I like this idea. Also, the use of labels would make things robust. This might also force us to figure out where the documentation has holes. If there is a non-obvious

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

Am 01.02.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that it cannot find a dictionary for that specific document language. This makes clear the possibility that there is a dictionary available for the desired

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 01.02.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that it cannot find a dictionary for that specific document language. This makes clear the

Re: Modifications of English messages in the pot file

Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: One message is unclear IMHO : In PrefPrinterUI.ui, replace 'Setting causes printer command to print to file and then use this actually to print.' with 'Command transmitted to the system to actually print the postscript file.' The first attached patch does

Re: PATCH to make Qt5 (and Qt4) compilable [Re: #8250: OS X with retina display]

Stephan Witt wrote: I studied it and came to the conclusion to give LyX+Qt5 a try. The attached patch is a result of this effort. I think Vincent has also already done some work towards this. Jürgen

Re: Permission to use the icon

On 02/01/2013 06:29 AM, Evgeny wrote: Hello We work on Windows Package Manager (http://code.google.com/p/windows-package-manager/) released under GNU GPL license. It helps to find and install software, keep a system up-to-date and uninstall it if no longer necessary. I'd like to ask for

[PATCH] Improve decimal alignment in tables (was: Fwd: Re: Small LyX patch)

Here is another patch from our own Martin Vermeer improving support for aligning on decimal point in tables. Unfortunately, since I do not use this at all, I am not able to see whether this is an improvement for all use cases. Please comment. JMarc Message original Sujet:

Re: PATCH to make Qt5 (and Qt4) compilable [Re: #8250: OS X with retina display]

Am 01.02.2013 um 16:18 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org: Stephan Witt wrote: I studied it and came to the conclusion to give LyX+Qt5 a try. The attached patch is a result of this effort. I think Vincent has also already done some work towards this. I know, that's why I was

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 01.02.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that it cannot find a

[PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that it cannot find a dictionary for that specific document language. This makes clear the possibility that there is a dictionary available for the desired language but that the document language is not set correctly. ---

[PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

If the spell checker cannot find a dictionary for the document language, the error directs the user to the appropriate section of the User Guide. --- src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > If the spell checker cannot find a dictionary for the document language, > the error directs the user to the appropriate section of the User Guide. > --- > src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp |3 ++- > 1 file

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

Le 01/02/2013 13:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Patch 2/2 addresses point 4. What is the policy for directing user's to help in an error message? Should the section number be included (i.e. 6.14 Spell Checking) or since that's fragile should it be excluded? How difficult would that be to have a

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/02/2013 13:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Patch 2/2 addresses point 4. What is the policy for directing user's >> to help in an error message? Should the section number be included >> (i.e. 6.14 Spell

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

Le 01/02/2013 13:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I like this idea. Also, the use of labels would make things robust. This might also force us to figure out where the documentation has holes. If there is a non-obvious error and we can't find a place in the docs to point a user to, then this is

Re: [PATCH 2/2] In a spell check error, direct user to docs

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/02/2013 13:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> I like this idea. Also, the use of labels would make things robust. >> This might also force us to figure out where the documentation has >> holes. If there is a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

Am 01.02.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that > it cannot find a dictionary for that specific document language. This > makes clear the possibility that there is a dictionary available for the > desired

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 01.02.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >> When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that >> it cannot find a dictionary for that specific document language. This >> makes

Re: Modifications of English messages in the pot file

Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > > One message is unclear IMHO : > > In PrefPrinterUI.ui, replace > > 'Setting causes printer command to print to file and then use this > > actually to print.' > > with > > 'Command transmitted to the system to actually print the postscript file.' > > The first

Re: PATCH to make Qt5 (and Qt4) compilable [Re: #8250: OS X with retina display]

Stephan Witt wrote: > I studied it and came to the conclusion to give LyX+Qt5 a try. The attached > patch is a result of this effort. I think Vincent has also already done some work towards this. Jürgen

Re: Permission to use the icon

On 02/01/2013 06:29 AM, Evgeny wrote: Hello We work on Windows Package Manager (http://code.google.com/p/windows-package-manager/) released under GNU GPL license. It helps to find and install software, keep a system up-to-date and uninstall it if no longer necessary. I'd like to ask for

[PATCH] Improve decimal alignment in tables (was: Fwd: Re: Small LyX patch)

Here is another patch from our own Martin Vermeer improving support for aligning on decimal point in tables. Unfortunately, since I do not use this at all, I am not able to see whether this is an improvement for all use cases. Please comment. JMarc Message original Sujet:

Re: PATCH to make Qt5 (and Qt4) compilable [Re: #8250: OS X with retina display]

Am 01.02.2013 um 16:18 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Stephan Witt wrote: >> I studied it and came to the conclusion to give LyX+Qt5 a try. The attached >> patch is a result of this effort. > > I think Vincent has also already done some work towards this. I know, that's why I was

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make a spell check error more informative

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 01.02.2013 um 13:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> >>> When the spell checker cannot find a dictionary, it now specifies that >>>