Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-06-07 18:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: Makes sense. Can you think of anything else to be careful with? For example, should it only be enabled if a class is selected which has chapters? No.

Re: test of math previews

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten from the list. The third inset works and is meant as a control. All 3 work without the patch. Here I was forgetting to also scan nested insets.

Re: test of math previews

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 05/06/2015 09:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : A possible way out would be outputting all the macros once at the beginning of the file, such

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

2015-06-07 18:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: Makes sense. Can you think of anything else to be careful with? For example, should it only be enabled if a class is selected which has chapters? No. Actually, chapterbib is a misnomer. It simply handles different bibliographies

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

2015-06-07 18:26 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: So we would have a checkbox just like we do for Sectioned bibliography? Called something like Separate bibliography per chapter? Yes. Although it probably has to be mutually exclusive (if bibtopic and chapterbib cannot be used in

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 06:40:30PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-06-07 18:26 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: So we would have a checkbox just like we do for Sectioned bibliography? Called something like Separate bibliography per chapter? Yes. Although it probably

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 08:54:13PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2015 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : What about lyx2lyx? (1) above would be easy to support by just adding to the preamble. But (2) could not be done, as far as I understand. Any thoughts on that? I think

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2015 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : What about lyx2lyx? (1) above would be easy to support by just adding to the preamble. But (2) could not be done, as far as I understand. Any thoughts on that? I think in this case that's all we can offer. Jürgen Scott

Re: assertion on master when deleting an empty chunk from inside

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:03:08PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Freitag, 5. Juni 2015 um 17:26:12, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org To reproduce, on master open mwe.lyx, place the cursor inside of the empty chunk, and press Backspace. Can others reproduce? Note also that

Re: test of math previews

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:20:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: Obvious one to test for Thanks for spotting this. It is due to the recursion in the macro definitions. The patch I sent takes this into account and lyx does not segfaults anymore, but latex will be caught in an endless loop and

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 12:10:57PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: 2015-06-06 4:07 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org: Would it make sense to ship bibtexall with LyX? It is used to run bibtex on all .aux files. It is especially useful with chapterbib, which allows a separate

Re: test of math previews

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: But I wonder why there are preview entries in the lyxpreview*.tex ... \begin{document} \begin{preview} ${\displaystyle {#1}}$ \end{preview} \begin{preview} $#1$ \end{preview} \begin{preview} ${\scriptstyle {#1}}$

Re: #9600: Groups for nomenclature

2015-06-07 9:51 GMT+02:00 edu Gpl mandrivagn...@gmail.com: Dear We can grouped indexs like this {linux:fedora} I hope we can grouped nomenclature like this. Yes, with some tricks. See the nomencl package documentation, sec. 5.1. Jürgen Regards ‏في الأحد، ٧ يونيو، ٢٠١٥, LyX Ticket

Re: #9600: Groups for nomenclature

Dear We can grouped indexs like this {linux:fedora} I hope we can grouped nomenclature like this. Regards ‏في الأحد، ٧ يونيو، ٢٠١٥, LyX Ticket Tracker t...@lyx.org كتب: #9600: Groups for nomenclature ---+- Reporter: mandrivagnome |

Re: #9600: Groups for nomenclature

Dear We can grouped indexs like this {linux:fedora} I hope we can grouped nomenclature like this. Regards ‏في الأحد، ٧ يونيو، ٢٠١٥, LyX Ticket Tracker كتب: > #9600: Groups for nomenclature > ---+- > Reporter: mandrivagnome |

Re: #9600: Groups for nomenclature

2015-06-07 9:51 GMT+02:00 edu Gpl : > Dear > We can grouped indexs like this > {linux:fedora} > I hope we can grouped nomenclature like this. > Yes, with some tricks. See the nomencl package documentation, sec. 5.1. Jürgen > > Regards > > > > ‏في الأحد، ٧ يونيو، ٢٠١٥,

Re: test of math previews

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > > lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten > from the list. The third inset works and is meant as a control. All 3 work > without the patch. Here I was forgetting to also scan nested insets. >

Re: test of math previews

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:20:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote: > > Obvious one to test for Thanks for spotting this. It is due to the recursion in the macro definitions. The patch I sent takes this into account and lyx does not segfaults anymore, but latex will be caught in an endless loop and

Re: test of math previews

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > But I wonder why there are preview entries in the lyxpreview*.tex > ... > \begin{document} > \begin{preview} > ${\displaystyle {#1}}$ > \end{preview} > > \begin{preview} > $#1$ > \end{preview} > > \begin{preview} > ${\scriptstyle

Re: test of math previews

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: > > Le 05/06/2015 09:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >> > >> A possible way out would be outputting all the macros once at the > >> beginning of

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 12:10:57PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-06 4:07 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > > > Would it make sense to ship bibtexall with LyX? It is used to run > > bibtex on all .aux files. It is especially useful with chapterbib, > > which allows a

Re: assertion on master when deleting an empty chunk from inside

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:03:08PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. Juni 2015 um 17:26:12, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > To reproduce, on master open mwe.lyx, place the cursor inside of the > > empty chunk, and press Backspace. > > > > Can others reproduce? > > > >

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

2015-06-07 18:26 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > So we would have a checkbox just like we do for "Sectioned > bibliography"? Called something like "Separate bibliography per > chapter"? > Yes. Although it probably has to be mutually exclusive (if bibtopic and chapterbib cannot

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 06:40:30PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-07 18:26 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > > > So we would have a checkbox just like we do for "Sectioned > > bibliography"? Called something like "Separate bibliography per > > chapter"? > > > > Yes.

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

2015-06-07 18:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > Makes sense. Can you think of anything else to be careful with? For > example, should it only be enabled if a class is selected which has > chapters? > No. Actually, "chapterbib" is a misnomer. It simply handles different

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-07 18:46 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak : > > > Makes sense. Can you think of anything else to be careful with? For > > example, should it only be enabled if a class is selected which has > > chapters? > >

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2015 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > What about lyx2lyx? (1) above would be easy to support by just adding to > the preamble. But (2) could not be done, as far as I understand. Any > thoughts on that? I think in this case that's all we can offer. Jürgen > Scott >

Re: include bibtexall in lib/scripts ?

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 08:54:13PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2015 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > What about lyx2lyx? (1) above would be easy to support by just adding to > > the preamble. But (2) could not be done, as far as I understand. Any > > thoughts on that? > >