Re: [PATCH] Improvements to cursor highlighting in the source panel

Le 28/09/2015 19:51, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Then it would make my life easier in improving TexRow to support such argument insets because the latex error reporting is more precise. Also, this could just be an option which would be enabled for document generation but disabled for latex export.

Re: Update on the patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 15/09/2015 17:54, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> I can remove more irrelevant parts and do that, but before that I am >> hoping to get some better configuration if anybody else is using emacs. >> BSD is just close to your style; the question is more: what is the >>

Size of box insets

Hi, we currently rescale box inset on the screen accordingly to its output size. This creates troubles if you use very thin boxes (I often need to include ERT, so with single-char width of box it visually ends up as ten lines of single char per line). Is there any objection to setting up some

Re: [LyX/master] Create module for paralist.sty

Georg Baum wrote: > commit e2d246bcb9339b1cf7c54a63da4734962f9c2655 > Author: Georg Baum > Date: Sun Sep 20 13:05:30 2015 +0200 > > Create module for paralist.sty > > paralist.sty extends the standard list environments by some more compact > versions. Support for

Re: 2 compilation errors with current master

Le 28/09/2015 19:11, Guillaume Munch a écrit : What about using explicitely lyx::make_shared in the TocBackend code? Doesn't it solve the ambiguity? Yes, I can accept this solution given that we won't have to support c++98 for very long. The drawback is that the issue might pop-up again in the

Re: Compilation Problem on Fedora

On 09/28/2015 01:37 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > Yes, just compiled with fresh build directory, and it was fine. Thanks. I can confirm this, but! when I compile for qt5 the binary only gets core dumped. These are the settings in run_cmake.sh cmake ../lyx \ -G"Unix Makefiles" \ -DLYX_CPACK=OFF

Re: 2 compilation errors with current master

Le 30/09/2015 15:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 28/09/2015 19:11, Guillaume Munch a écrit : What about using explicitely lyx::make_shared in the TocBackend code? Doesn't it solve the ambiguity? Yes, I can accept this solution given that we won't have to support c++98 for very long. The

Re: 2 compilation errors with current master

Le 30/09/2015 18:08, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Surely more difficult than my patch. Also it's pointless spending too much effort since support/shared_ptr.h will disappear in 2.3. Yes, but I dislike solutions that require to check compiler version number in code. I think we have the same

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Just an update: with Qt 4.8.7 and the most recent master it is now possible to have Huge and Giant sized icons and most things look well. Widgets of the class="QGroupBox" are still broken, but this depends on the Qt4 GUI Style chosen. Can't test with Qt5, the binary gets core dumped. While