Re: improved section 6.11 of User Guide (2.0.x), please CC me because I'm not subscribed

I have submitted a patch against the correct branch, 2.2.x. I don't know how to use change tracking. Please provide steps for doing that. I am currently following the guide at http://www.lyx.org/HowToUseGIT. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 06/21/2016

improved Customized Page Headers and Footers section of User Guide 2.2.x (please CC me, colinnkee...@gmail.com, not subscribed)

This time, I used the correct branch (2.2.x) instead of 2.0.x. This patch makes more sense, showing just 215 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-). Again, please CC me (colinnkee...@gmail.com) because I have not subscribed to this list. From 91b6fb3daf89fcfdca66fa61baea5ebb9ee96403 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00

Re: improved section 6.11 of User Guide (2.0.x), please CC me because I'm not subscribed

On 06/21/2016 03:20 PM, Colin Keenan wrote: > 0001-improved-section-6.11-of-User-Guide.patch > is attached, > > providing > improvements to section 6.11 of the User Guide for branch 2.0.x. > Please CC me because I am not subscribed to the LyX developer mailing > list. > I am just following these

Re: lyx-cvs messages: show file names changed

On 06/21/2016 07:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 01:43:18PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:35:54AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >>> On 04/15/2016 05:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:09:56PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak

Re: Compiling with Microsoft Visual C++

Thanks for the sustained support! On 21.06.2016 22:02, Georg Baum wrote: The standalone SDK should be installed below C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\. If there is nothing below one of these folders then it is probably not installed. Have the C:\Program

Re: After having upgraded to LyX 2.2.0, could it be useful to have also LyX 2.1.5?

Le 22/06/2016 07:10, CarLaTeX a écrit : If have already upgraded to LyX 2.2.0 on Windows 10 but I still have also LyX 2.1.4 on my pc. Could it be useful to upgrade my 2.1.4 to 2.1.5? For example, in case of errors in 2.2.0, just to compare the behaviour in 2.1.5? Or is it unadvisable? One

Re: provides "package" 1

On 06/21/2016 10:51 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 06/21/2016 06:58 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: I was wondering if there's a special reason why provides fontenc 1 provides inputenc 1 provides amsmath 1 prevent the corresponding packages from loading, but provides fontspec 1 provides listings 1