Re: Should the author of a file format change update the file format of docs in master?

2016-08-12 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:07:30AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, August 11, 2016 3:33:10 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Good idea. I think it makes sense and does get rid of the problem. > > Please feel free to update Development.lyx with these instructions. Or > > if you want

Re: Should the author of a file format change update the file format of docs in master?

2016-08-12 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 3:33:10 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Good idea. I think it makes sense and does get rid of the problem. > Please feel free to update Development.lyx with these instructions. Or > if you want me to, I will do it eventually. > > Scott Please do. I will be busy for

Re: workaround to 'git reset --hard' not working because of .gitattributes

2016-08-12 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 29/07/2016 à 16:16, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 28/07/2016 à 23:19, Richard Heck a écrit : I wonder if git rm .gitattributes git add .gitattributes git reset --hard would be enough. I do not understand how this would solve, but I will try next time it happens. git rm

Re: [LyX/master] Foils.lyx: fix output of author

2016-08-12 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2016-08-11, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:43:26PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> The only thing I would like is to have test files showing the wrong >> behaviour. Hiding a symptom does not feel like a real cure. Indeed. However,

Re: alt+x does not give focus to minibuffer if it is open

2016-08-12 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 12/08/2016 à 19:44, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:28:57PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 12/08/2016 à 01:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : The change is due to 7ac70092. From what I understand, this is an intended change and there's no easy way to make alt+x work the

Re: alt+x does not give focus to minibuffer if it is open

2016-08-12 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 07:28:57PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 12/08/2016 à 01:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > The change is due to 7ac70092. From what I understand, this is an > > intended change and there's no easy way to make alt+x work the second > > time. I'll give up here on

Re: alt+x does not give focus to minibuffer if it is open

2016-08-12 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 12/08/2016 à 01:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : The change is due to 7ac70092. From what I understand, this is an intended change and there's no easy way to make alt+x work the second time. I'll give up here on this, unless someone gives me an idea for a possible solution. By looking at it,

Re: Tiny LyX menu

2016-08-12 Thread Richard Heck
On 08/12/2016 03:03 AM, Hartmut Haase wrote: > Hi, > > since Xubuntu 16.04 the LyX window starts with a tiny menu bar (~ 6-8 > point) and small icons. Does anyone know why? Did you start using 2.2.x with 16.04? 2.2.x does feature HiDPI support, and it may be that this is confusing the WM.

Tiny LyX menu

2016-08-12 Thread Hartmut Haase
Hi, since Xubuntu 16.04 the LyX window starts with a tiny menu bar (~ 6-8 point) and small icons. Does anyone know why? -- Viele Grüße, Hartmut Hungerhilfe: http://www.thehungersite.com Ohne Zensur suchen: http://suche.amnesty-bergedorf.de Googeln ohne Google: https://www.startpage.com/deu