Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:33:03PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The > > > > slightly weird thing would be that

Re: Can't push a commit: "No space left on device"

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:56:04AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/03/2017 à 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > Le 07/03/2017 à 09:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > I get the following output: > > > > Indeed the disk is full (50G). It turns out that trac.log is now 10G > >

Re: [LyX/master] buffer-export without argument exports the default format

On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 10:10:58PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > I am not sure to understand since I am not familiar with this part of LyX. > But I will push a patch that makes "buffer-export *" synonymous to > buffer-export so that your patch becomes simpler. Thanks, that does make things

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The > > > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in > > > charge of the 2.3.x branch until

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The > > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in > > charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:03:13AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/03/2017 à 01:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The > > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in > > charge of the 2.3.x branch

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:23:13AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 00.06.24 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [...] > > Thank you Scott for all distilling your experience as release manager, as > this > is important to improve the development process. :-) > > I will left

Trac Password File

It looks as if we have once again for some reason lost the entire trac.htpasswd file. I noticed this because trac refused to accept my password. I was able to reset it but then remembered what had happened before. This may have been due to the disk's being full. In any event, I've restored the

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On 03/06/2017 07:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:53:08PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> If you create a 2.4 milestone then I can already re-target the bugs that >> I care about so as to have a better picture of 2.3. > +1 I've created 2.4.0 and 2.4.x milestones.

Re: LyX 2.2.3 crashes repeatably when displaying section 2.1.1 of the tutorial

Le 07/03/17 à 21:32, Richard Heck a écrit : It is not necessary to resize the screen, just get to section 2.1.1 of the Tutorial. Scrolling or searching for "Typing, Viewing" will do it. I can't reproduce this, though I am not using Qt5, so perhaps that is part of the issue. FWIW, I can

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On 03/04/2017 03:53 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 24/02/2017 à 18:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> Hi there, >> >> A good subject before the week-end: what do we need to do before >> declaring feature freeze for 2.3? Personally I have finished a cycle or >> breaking/fixing the math editor

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The > slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in > charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch 2.3.x is good for devs and less good for 2.3 because it gets less

Re: LyX 2.2.3 crashes repeatably when displaying section 2.1.1 of the tutorial

On 03/07/2017 05:40 AM, Helge Hafting wrote: > I compiled & installed lyx 2.2.3, in order to check some things in the > tutorial. > > git pull > > ./autogen.sh > > ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-gnu-ld --with-version-suffix=test > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" > > make

Re: [LyX/master] Fix typo found by coverity

On 03/07/2017 06:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/03/2017 à 12:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> commit dc126bad0441eb8721043e597657d5c18bdf6c90 >> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> Date: Tue Mar 7 12:02:54 2017 +0100 >> >> Fix typo found by coverity >> >>

Re: LyX 2.2 cannot read a document from LyX 2.1?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:06:12AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Monday, 6 March 2017 22.27.25 WET Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The problem is that the file starts with a U+FEFF BOM mark, and most > > probably lyx2lyx doesn't expect to deal with BOM marks. Actually, the > > conversion

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #92

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/92/

Re: [LyX/master] Fix typo found by coverity

Le 07/03/2017 à 12:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : commit dc126bad0441eb8721043e597657d5c18bdf6c90 Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: Tue Mar 7 12:02:54 2017 +0100 Fix typo found by coverity We were not testing for the right end(), although it is not sure that

[PATCH] Output of en- and em-dashes

The attached patch fixes the regression introduced in 2.2 about the output of en- and em-dashes. In 2.2 en- and em-dashes are output as the \textendash and \textemdash macros, causing changed output in old documents and also bugs (for example, #10490). With this patch, documents produced with

LyX 2.2.3 crashes repeatably when displaying section 2.1.1 of the tutorial

I compiled & installed lyx 2.2.3, in order to check some things in the tutorial. git pull ./autogen.sh ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-gnu-ld --with-version-suffix=test CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" make -j 5 #make install I started up LyX, english version:

Re: Can't push a commit: "No space left on device"

Le 07/03/2017 à 10:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : OK, the file is gone now. A big part of the remaining space taken is 18G in tracdumps, which holds... backups of our gigantic trac log file :) I did not touch it for now, since this disk space will naturally be reclaimed as old backups get

CI+Coverity (was: Re: Working on CI job that runs automated tests)

Le 27/02/2017 à 08:56, Christian Ridderström a écrit : Hi, This is a CI job I'm working on that's intended to run automated tests: Hi Christian, The next natural step could be to use your CI stuff to update our coverity builds: https://scan.coverity.com/projects/4164 Currently the build

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #91

Le 07/03/2017 à 04:01, ci-...@inria.fr a écrit : Makefile:773: recipe for target 'dist' failed Command 'make distcheck' failed, exiting make[3]: *** No rule to make target '1.2.5/myspell.hxx', needed by 'distdir'. Stop. make[2]: *** [distdir] Error 1 make[1]: *** [distdir] Error 1 make: ***

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

Le 07/03/2017 à 01:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : When we branch 2.3, this branch would be named "2.3.x", right? The slightly weird thing would be that the release manager would be in charge of the 2.3.x branch until 2.3.0 and then the stable branch maintainer would be in charge of the branch

Re: Can't push a commit: "No space left on device"

Le 07/03/2017 à 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 07/03/2017 à 09:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I get the following output: Indeed the disk is full (50G). It turns out that trac.log is now 10G (since 2013!). I am currently downloading it, just in case, and will then delete it. OK,

Re: Can't push a commit: "No space left on device"

Le 07/03/2017 à 09:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I get the following output: Indeed the disk is full (50G). It turns out that trac.log is now 10G (since 2013!). I am currently downloading it, just in case, and will then delete it. JMarc

Re: How far is 2.3.0?

On Tuesday, 7 March 2017 00.06.24 WET Scott Kostyshak wrote: [...] Thank you Scott for all distilling your experience as release manager, as this is important to improve the development process. :-) I will left the other issues that you have raised for others. > In case someone is craving

Can't push a commit: "No space left on device"

I get the following output: $ git push -n To g...@git.lyx.org:lyx 15babdc..cd87bd7 master -> master $ git push Counting objects: 8, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (8/8), done. Writing objects: 100% (8/8), 1012 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 8 (delta