Am 23.01.2018 um 19:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> Qt 5.9.4 was released today:
>
> http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/
>
> This is good for a few reasons. First, it seems that Qt is sticking to
> their planned schedule more than they have in the past. Qt 5.9.4 was
> schedule
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> We alread have that and call it ftp mirrors, but you need to select them
> manually.
> I would suggest, that you try to download from japanese mirror in Seoul
> and american (UCSD) mirror in US and report back if your download speed is
> bette
Am 23.01.2018 um 19:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Qt 5.9.4 was released today:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/
Many thanks. I upgraded and can compile LyX with it. I also built an
installer using current 2.3.x branch and all tests were passed.
However,
https://www.lyx.
On 2018-01-23, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2018 um 13:07:53, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2018-01-23, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Yes, this reduced also the number of _lyx22 failed tests to 2:
> 3699 - export/examples/seminar_lyx21 (Failed)
> 5068 - export/examples/fr/s
Qt 5.9.4 was released today:
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/01/23/qt-5-9-4-released/
This is good for a few reasons. First, it seems that Qt is sticking to
their planned schedule more than they have in the past. Qt 5.9.4 was
scheduled for January, and they delivered. This is good to know for our
p
On Thursday, 18 January 2018 06.00.41 WET Joel Kulesza wrote:
> b.
> I will use such Notebooks more and more in the future, and it would be
> extremely useful if I could import then in an easy way into LyX.
>
>
> Here I've used the pdfpages package to include PDFs from Jupyter (or other
> tools)
On 23.01.2018 11:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
When is it useful to extend an extension in the same user directory? I
do not see the point...
For example, you might have a module locally installed in the user dir
which you want to extend. This is not strictly speaking an extension of
an ext
Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2018 um 13:07:53, schrieb Guenter Milde
> > Yes. Should be maximal 3 IMHO.
>
> Could you try something like:
>
> * pull 8da6cdcf23d042cf431a
> * set max-round-trips to 3 and test for new failures.
This increased the count to 56.
Setting the value to 4: ==> 55
Setting t
Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2018 um 13:07:53, schrieb Guenter Milde
> Dear Kornel,
>
> On 2018-01-23, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018 um 22:37:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >
> >> On 2018-01-22, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> > I expanded the lyx2lyx test so, the an error is
Dear Kornel,
On 2018-01-23, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018 um 22:37:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
>> On 2018-01-22, Kornel Benko wrote:
...
>> > I expanded the lyx2lyx test so, the an error is emitted at 10th
>> > repeated run to export lyx16x.
>> > If two consecutive created
Le 23/01/2018 à 10:02, racoon a écrit :
On 23.01.2018 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/01/2018 à 09:35, racoon a écrit :
Yes, that would work for my case. However, it will fail if I want to
extend an extension since it will not search my user directory.
Let's say in the user directory
On 23.01.2018 11:02, racoon wrote:
On 23.01.2018 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/01/2018 à 09:35, racoon a écrit :
Yes, that would work for my case. However, it will fail if I want to
extend an extension since it will not search my user directory.
Let's say in the user directory ther
On 23.01.2018 10:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/01/2018 à 09:35, racoon a écrit :
Yes, that would work for my case. However, it will fail if I want to
extend an extension since it will not search my user directory.
Let's say in the user directory there is
1. user_dir/foo.layout.ext
wh
Le 23/01/2018 à 06:11, Richard Heck a écrit :
My sense, from our previous discussion, is that this would work in the
cases racoon had in mind. But I'm not sure why this wouldn't scale. We
could of course look also for *.ext.ext.
OK, imagine that we have support for a site directory (and I think
Le 23/01/2018 à 09:35, racoon a écrit :
Yes, that would work for my case. However, it will fail if I want to
extend an extension since it will not search my user directory.
Let's say in the user directory there is
1. user_dir/foo.layout.ext
which extends an extension
Actually, what I propos
On 23.01.2018 07:11, Richard Heck wrote:
On 01/22/2018 04:23 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 22/01/2018 à 10:10, racoon a écrit :
So LyX should load the library's stdinset.inc first and then load the
code that extends it next.
Richard, who ran into similar problems as I did, suggested that
On 22.01.2018 11:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 22/01/2018 à 10:10, racoon a écrit :
So LyX should load the library's stdinset.inc first and then load the
code that extends it next.
Richard, who ran into similar problems as I did, suggested that LyX
could be enhanced by automatically look
Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018 um 22:37:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2018-01-22, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Thanks to Günter, the ligature-problem is gone.
>
> Unfortunately, the ligature-problem is not completely gone, just the
> tests pass.
>
> > I expanded the lyx2lyx test so, the an error is
18 matches
Mail list logo
