Re: Forward and reverse search failing (again?) on 2.3.0rc

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:40 PM, wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:59 PM, wrote: > >> With LyX 2.3.0rc and Skim on Mac, both forward search and reverse search >> are

Re: Windows Installer: Future Issues

On 03/13/2018 09:43 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 12.03.2018 um 04:32 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> That is a serious mistake: to focus on "average users". But it has >> clearly become pointless to discuss this any longer. > > Dear Richard, > > I cannot leave this commented because it is too fundamental.

Re: Update on 2.3.0 situation and Windows-specific issues

On 03/13/2018 09:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 13.03.2018 um 04:17 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> I definitely agree that every additional dialog is an additional >> possibility for confusion. I think where we disagree is on the benefit >> that the dialog could bring. > > Yes. You don't understand

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #835

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/835/

Re: Update on 2.3.0 situation and Windows-specific issues

Am 13.03.2018 um 04:17 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I definitely agree that every additional dialog is an additional possibility for confusion. I think where we disagree is on the benefit that the dialog could bring. Yes. You don't understand that users who don't about LaTeX and deny the update

Re: Windows Installer: Future Issues

Am 12.03.2018 um 04:32 schrieb Richard Heck: That is a serious mistake: to focus on "average users". But it has clearly become pointless to discuss this any longer. Dear Richard, I cannot leave this commented because it is too fundamental. I tried to calm down, but cannot. What is LyX

Re: Update on 2.3.0 situation and Windows-specific issues

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:16:21PM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:08:35AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > > > Here is a proposal: > > > > "LyX is going to update MiKTeX to the last 2.9 version. > > "If you do not use MiKTeX with other applications than LyX, you

Re: Update on 2.3.0 situation and Windows-specific issues

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:08:35AM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Here is a proposal: > > "LyX is going to update MiKTeX to the last 2.9 version. > "If you do not use MiKTeX with other applications than LyX, you can continue > safely. > "If you do use MiKTeX with other applications and do

Re: Update on 2.3.0 situation and Windows-specific issues

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:17:58AM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Can't you see that the majority doesn't know what a package is? Most > > of my students and colleagues didn't know this but were able to write their > > master or Ph.D. thesis with LyX. > > Therefore giving users a choice they

Re: Forward and reverse search failing (again?) on 2.3.0rc

list_em...@icloud.com wrote: > OK???here???s a minimal example. Just open the IEEEtran-Journal.lyx template > and render it to Skim without modifying it. Behavior is as I describe above. When I open IEEEtran-Journal.lyx turn on synchronization in document preferences then both forward and

Re: Forward and reverse search failing (again?) on 2.3.0rc

> On Mar 13, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:59 PM, > wrote: > With LyX 2.3.0rc and Skim on Mac, both forward search and reverse search are > failing for me. Didn’t someone fix this

Re: Forward and reverse search failing (again?) on 2.3.0rc

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:59 PM, wrote: > With LyX 2.3.0rc and Skim on Mac, both forward search and reverse search > are failing for me. Didn’t someone fix this not too long ago? It fails > whether LyX is in some random location or the supposed default location >

Re: [LyX/master] Fix known_escaped_chars

On 03/13/2018 08:34 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > commit ab4e9adf8626e0f1d5afea59bc58ebcce341dc98 > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller > Date:   Tue Mar 13 13:00:58 2018 +0100 > >     Fix known_escaped_chars > > > Should go to 2.3.2-staging (fixes a regression introduced by >

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

On 03/13/2018 08:03 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2018-03-13 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko >: > > #0  strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > #1  0x7f5abf26043c in std::__cxx11::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator

Re: Diagnosing a crash

On 03/13/2018 11:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 13/03/2018 à 16:26, Paul A. Rubin a écrit : Aspell is only available if the development headers (e.g. libaspell-dev on debian) are available at compile time . JMarc Ah. I installed the precompiled package from Liv's PPA, so I guess he

Re: Next tex2lyx-test failing

2018-03-13 16:27 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko: > Yep. Amend of amend :) > Actually, the second crash was the result of the first fix ... Jürgen > > Kornel >

Re: Diagnosing a crash

Le 13/03/2018 à 16:26, Paul A. Rubin a écrit : Aspell is only available if the development headers (e.g. libaspell-dev on debian) are available at compile time . JMarc Ah. I installed the precompiled package from Liv's PPA, so I guess he compiled it without Aspell (which is fine with me).

Re: Next tex2lyx-test failing

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 16:01:39 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-13 15:46 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > This time it is with test-insets.tex. > > tex2lyx crashes. > > Better? > > Jürgen Yep. Amend of amend :) Kornel signature.asc

Re: Diagnosing a crash

On 03/13/2018 11:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 13/03/2018 à 15:56, Paul A. Rubin a écrit : Apparently not. I just upgraded to 2.3.0. It selected Enchant as the spellchecker and did not give me any options in the drop-down list (even though aspell is installed here). On the bright side,

Re: Diagnosing a crash

Le 13/03/2018 à 15:56, Paul A. Rubin a écrit : Apparently not. I just upgraded to 2.3.0. It selected Enchant as the spellchecker and did not give me any options in the drop-down list (even though aspell is installed here). On the bright side, that eliminates the bug. Aspell is only available

Re: Next tex2lyx-test failing

2018-03-13 15:46 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > This time it is with test-insets.tex. > tex2lyx crashes. > Better? Jürgen

Re: Diagnosing a crash

On 03/13/2018 04:37 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Paul A. Rubin wrote: .cset" could not be opened for reading or does not exist.lib/aspell/ Aborted (core dumped) This looks totally weird. The correct error should say something like "lib/aspell/your_encoding.cset" could not be opened for reading or

Next tex2lyx-test failing

This time it is with test-insets.tex. tex2lyx crashes. The backtrace from core is: (gdb) bt #0 0x0070d205 in lyx::operator+ (l=L"\\", r=0x0) at /usr2/src/lyx/ lyx-git/src/support/docstring.cpp:191 #1 0x00623c54 in lyx::(anonymous namespace)::convert_unicodesymbols (s=L"\\}") at

Re: [LyX/master] Fix known_escaped_chars

> > commit ab4e9adf8626e0f1d5afea59bc58ebcce341dc98 > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller > Date: Tue Mar 13 13:00:58 2018 +0100 > > Fix known_escaped_chars > Should go to 2.3.2-staging (fixes a regression introduced by 624a6642e93367). Jürgen

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 13:03:04 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-13 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > #0 strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > > #1 0x7f5abf26043c in std::__cxx11::basic_string > std::char_traits, std::allocator

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-13 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > #0 strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > #1 0x7f5abf26043c in std::__cxx11::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator >::compare(char const*) const > () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 > #2

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 11:31:19 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-13 10:15 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > I see. The CJK.lyx is different here. > > An the CJK.tex is identical to minde? > > > Compiling now with a clean source tree. > > > > NOW,

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-13 10:15 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > I see. The CJK.lyx is different here. > An the CJK.tex is identical to minde? > Compiling now with a clean source tree. > NOW, with qt4.8.7, I see a crash from tex2lyx. > Changing to qt5.6.1. Compiling. > No crash.

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 08:57:42 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-12 20:14 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > Apparently you are testing lyx2.3.x. > > No, master, actually. The bugfix of the mentioned commit shows up, but not > the problem you face. See

Re: Diagnosing a crash

Paul A. Rubin wrote: > >.cset" could not be opened for reading or does not exist.lib/aspell/ > >Aborted (core dumped) This looks totally weird. The correct error should say something like "lib/aspell/your_encoding.cset" could not be opened for reading or does not exist. Maybe the encoding is

Re: Forward and reverse search failing (again?) on 2.3.0rc

list_em...@icloud.com wrote: > With LyX 2.3.0rc and Skim on Mac, both forward search and reverse search are > failing for me. Didn???t someone fix this not too long ago? It fails whether > LyX is in some random location or the supposed default location > /Applications/LyX.app. I just tried it

Re: \[ddd]dots in mathed

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:27:58AM +, Joel Kulesza wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > Whether now, or after it's committed I would appreciate testing from > > > someone > > > sitting on Win and Mac(?Retina) machine

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-12 20:14 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > Apparently you are testing lyx2.3.x. No, master, actually. The bugfix of the mentioned commit shows up, but not the problem you face. See attached file. Jürgen CJK.lyx Description: application/lyx %% LyX 2.4.0dev created this file.