Re: Hebrew Article with LuaTeX: DavidCLM not found (but succeeds with XeTeX)

On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:15:11AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 12:19:42PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 29.08.2020, 02:20 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > If I compile lib/templates/Articles/Hebrew_Article_%28KOMA- > > > Script%29.lyx > > >

Re: Font naming problem

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:39:24PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:04:24 -0500 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 12:51:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > This is for lyx2.4 _and_ lyx2.3 > > > > > > 1. open new file in lyx > > > 2. write some text >

Re: [LyX/master] Display manually set itemize symbols

On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 01:40:28PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 02:19:25PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Freitag, dem 04.03.2022 um 11:01 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Question mark sounds good. Could get a bit fancier and do "?1" and > > > "?2" to

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Sat, 05 Mar 2022 18:41:40 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 18:36 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Or even > > search-include non-output-content true > > ? > > > > Would be a new command. > > yes, even better (although it is not clear from the command

Re: [LyX/master] Display manually set itemize symbols

On Sat, Mar 05, 2022 at 02:19:25PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, dem 04.03.2022 um 11:01 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Question mark sounds good. Could get a bit fancier and do "?1" and > > "?2" to differentiate between further levels of nesting. Or instead > > of "?1",

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 18:36 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Or even > search-include non-output-content true > ? > > Would be a new command. yes, even better (although it is not clear from the command that it only applies advanced search). Jürgen signature.asc Description: This

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:16:07 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sat, 05 Mar 2022 17:22:06 +0100 > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 16:42 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > I have no idea, how to get notes output in latex mode > > > > Adapt the conditions in

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Sat, 05 Mar 2022 17:22:06 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 16:42 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > I have no idea, how to get notes output in latex mode > > Adapt the conditions in InsetNote::latex() accordingly. > > > > and I > > > don't see where to

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 16:42 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > I have no idea, how to get notes output in latex mode Adapt the conditions in InsetNote::latex() accordingly. > > and I > > don't see where to opt-out (as I'd have expected). > > this could be done with the function

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Sat, 05 Mar 2022 16:17:59 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 16:10 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Does the attached work as expected? > > It finds in deactivated branches (good!) but not in notes (bad!) I have no idea, how to get notes output in latex mode

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 16:10 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Does the attached work as expected? It finds in deactivated branches (good!) but not in notes (bad!) and I don't see where to opt-out (as I'd have expected). Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: Advanced find does not search in deactivated branches

Am Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:16:53 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 10:31 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Given the string 'ABCD' while 'B' is in deactivated branch. > > Now considering the case searching for the word 'ACD'. > > Should it be found? > > Don't know. >

Re: [LyX/master] Display manually set itemize symbols

Am Freitag, dem 04.03.2022 um 11:01 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Question mark sounds good. Could get a bit fancier and do "?1" and > "?2" to differentiate between further levels of nesting. Or instead > of "?1", perhaps "?4" or whatever the nesting depth is. Done (the latter) at

Re: [LyX/master] Remove unused function

Am Sat, 05 Mar 2022 09:29:23 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 09:07 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > As you are at it, we also have identical functions with different > > names. > > See > > docstring const & Bullet::getText() const > > and > > docstring

Re: [LyX/master] Remove unused function

Am Samstag, dem 05.03.2022 um 09:07 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > As you are at it, we also have identical functions with different > names. > See > docstring const & Bullet::getText() const > and > docstring const & Bullet::getUnicode() const > > Any reason to not unify them? The

Re: [LyX/master] Remove unused function

Am Sat, 5 Mar 2022 08:17:53 +0100 (CET) schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller : > commit ad31043987bd55f0519448fd46dcf8ed96ce6475 > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller > Date: Sat Mar 5 08:51:32 2022 +0100 > > Remove unused function As you are at it, we also have identical functions with different