Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:56:20 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > then 1L would be correct. > We may need 1ULL here. Kornel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel pgpQQ3tmnTSXa.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -- ly

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:40:19 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:38:23 +0200 > > schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > Do you have a bette

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-22 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:38:23 +0200 > schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Do you have a better idea? > > > > long long ? > > Pavel > > Ok, is the attached working

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 22.04.2022 um 09:01 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > Also, I'm assuming that the user either uses the new insets or the > > old, pure LaTeX way of doing index, not a mix of both. Does this > > make > > sense? > > With LaTeX, both methods can be used in parallel, which might be

Re: Expand debug to contain more than 31 cases

2022-04-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:38:23 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 02:53:37PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Do you have a better idea? > > long long ? > Pavel Ok, is the attached working for you? Kornel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http:

Re: features/indexmacros

2022-04-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, dem 22.04.2022 um 03:49 +0200 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > Code-wise, the design looks really clean!  Thanks. > Also, I'm assuming that the user either uses the new insets or the > old, pure LaTeX way of doing index, not a mix of both. Does this make > sense? With LaTeX, both methods