Re: LyX 2.4 RC4

2024-03-27 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Thanks. I am out of town for a few days and will do the release Sunday.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024, 7:32 PM Stephan Witt  wrote:

> Am 24.03.2024 um 23:36 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> >
> > One last RC, just to be on the safe side.
> >
> > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/
> >
> > Please prepare binaries.
>
> Hi all,
>
> the binary package for mac is ready and sent to Riki.
>
> Best regards,
> Stephan
>
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: LyX 2.4 RC4

2024-03-27 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 24.03.2024 um 23:36 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
>
> One last RC, just to be on the safe side.
>
> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/
>
> Please prepare binaries.

Hi all,

the binary package for mac is ready and sent to Riki.

Best regards,
Stephan
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: LyX 2.4 RC4

2024-03-27 Thread Eberhard W Lisse
Any chance of a Mac Build? :-)-O

el
On 25/03/2024 00:36, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> One last RC, just to be on the safe side.
> 
> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/
> 
> Please prepare binaries.
> 


-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel


Re: Layout file format change proposal

2024-03-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 09:59:04AM +0100, Lorenzo Bertini wrote:
> Dear devs,
> I don't know if this has been discussed before. Lyx uses it's own
> format .layout (or .module), with it's own parser. However, the same
> information can be easily saved stored in another format. I asked a
> chatbot to convert "amsbook.layout" to an hypothetical "amsbook.yaml"
> file:
> 
> format: 104
> columns: 1
> sides: 2
> page_style: Headers
> docbook_root: book
> provides:
>   - amsmath: 1
>   - makeidx: 1
> class_options:
>   font_size: [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]
> default_modules:
>   - theorems-ams
>   - eqs-within-sections
>   - figs-within-sections
> styles:
>   Standard:
> category: MainText
> margin: Static
> latex_type: Paragraph
> latex_name: dummy
> par_indent: MM
> par_skip: 0.4
> align: Block
> align_possible: [Block, Left, Right, Center]
> label_type: No_Label
> docbook_tag: para
> preamble: "\numberwithin{section}{chapter}"
> inputs:
>   - stdsections.inc
>   - stdinsets.inc
>   - numreport.inc
>   - lyxmacros.inc
>   - stdlayouts.inc
>   - stdlists.inc
>   - stdfloats.inc
>   - stdcounters.inc
>   - amsdefs.inc
> unwanted_styles:
>   - Verse
>   - Bibliography:
>   toc_level: 0
> styles_append:
>   Section:
> align: Center
> font:
>   series: Bold
>   size: Large
> toc_level: 1
>   Subsection:
> font:
>   series: Bold
>   size: Normal
> toc_level: 2
>   Subsubsection:
> font:
>   shape: Italic
>   size: Normal
> toc_level: 3
>   Section*:
> align: Center
> font:
>   series: Bold
>   size: Large
>   Subsection*:
> font:
>   series: Bold
>   size: Normal
>   Subsubsection*:
> font:
>   shape: Italic
>   size: Normal
>   Paragraph:
> font:
>   series: Medium
> toc_level: 4
>   Chapter_Exercises:
> margin: First_Dynamic
> latex_type: Item_Environment
> latex_name: lyxxcb
> next_no_indent: 1
> left_margin: MMN
> label_sep: xx
> par_skip: 0.0
> item_sep: 0.2
> top_sep: 0.7
> bottom_sep: 0.7
> par_sep: 0.3
> align: Block
> align_possible: [Block, Left]
> label_type: Itemize
> label_font:
>   shape: Up
>   series: Bold
> preamble: "\newenvironment{lyxxcb}..."
> argument_listpreamble:
>   - label_string: "List preamble"
> menu_string: "List Preamble"
> tooltip: "LaTeX code to be inserted before the first item"
> pass_thru: 1
> font:
>   family: typewriter
>   color: latex
> docbook_tag: para
> docbook_attr: role='chapter-exercises'
> 
> I think it looks pretty good. The advantages of using an industry standard 
> are:
> 1. People already know the format. This could encourage publishers to
> provide layouts.
> 2. Existing and solid tools for parsing can be used. Even if not
> directly by LyX, someone manipulating layouts externally doesn't need
> to reinvent the wheel.
> 
> Let me know what you think.

Cool idea, Lorenzo! There have been some discussions in the past on
using standard formats, even for the .lyx file itself. I can see the
advantages of that but I don't know what the cost of converting to them
is.

Scott
-- 
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel