Re: Misplaced IME window in 2.4.0

2024-04-07 Thread Allan Chain
On 2024-04-07 12:38 PM, lyx-devel-requ...@lists.lyx.org wrote: On 2024-04-07 4:15 AM,lyx-devel-requ...@lists.lyx.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:48:03PM GMT, Allan Chain wrote: Hi Scott, I think its a regression in LyX code. Although the Qt version is different, the code in 2.3.x

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:13:44PM GMT, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 4/7/24 12:46, José Matos wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 11:31 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Fair enough. That was what I was afraid of (and expected). > > > > > > Scott > > A possible mid-term solution, to your use

Re: SIGSEGV introduced recently on master when deleting an inset

2024-04-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 07:34:10PM GMT, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 06/04/2024 à 22:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > To reproduce: > > > > 1. Open the attached example. > > 2. Put the cursor just after the Note inset. > > 3. Press twice. > > > > I get a SIGSEGV with the attached

Re: Layout file format change proposal

2024-04-07 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/7/24 08:39, Lorenzo Bertini wrote: Just out of curiosity I've tried converting a LyX document to YAML and XML to see how they would look. I spent some time once working on an XML file format, thinking I could use some of the machinery developed for XHTML output, which is now even more

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/7/24 12:46, José Matos wrote: On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 11:31 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Fair enough. That was what I was afraid of (and expected). Scott A possible mid-term solution, to your use case, is to set the output format of the latest stable version. This would mean that any

Re: c2248 compile error with qcompare and Qt 6.7.0

2024-04-07 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/7/24 14:48, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/04/2024 à 18:09, Yu Jin a écrit :     Is it better when replacing uint with unsigned int? Yeah, it is. This is now in master. Riki, can I backport this trivial fix (c7f53afd), along with the more complicated 51562ff3 to 2.4.x? This is

Re: SIGSEGV introduced recently on master when deleting an inset

2024-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 07/04/2024 à 20:45, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Sonntag, dem 07.04.2024 um 19:34 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: This is now fixed in master at 89901123c579. Thanks, this also fixes the other, minor issue (CT related) I reported. Great, I was about to look for this one. JMarc

Re: c2248 compile error with qcompare and Qt 6.7.0

2024-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 05/04/2024 à 18:09, Yu Jin a écrit : Is it better when replacing uint with unsigned int? Yeah, it is. This is now in master. Riki, can I backport this trivial fix (c7f53afd), along with the more complicated 51562ff3 to 2.4.x? This is needed for compilation with MSVC 2019. JMarc

Re: SIGSEGV introduced recently on master when deleting an inset

2024-04-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 07.04.2024 um 19:34 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > This is now fixed in master at 89901123c579. Thanks, this also fixes the other, minor issue (CT related) I reported. -- Jürgen -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: 2.3.x does not compile on Windows

2024-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 05/04/2024 à 22:12, Yu Jin a écrit : Hi, Since 2.3.8 is around the corner I thought to try compiling the 2.3.x branch but failed on Format.cpp, get these errors: Build started at 22:05... 1>-- Build started: Project: LyX (applications\LyX\LyX), Configuration: Debug x64 --

Re: SIGSEGV introduced recently on master when deleting an inset

2024-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 06/04/2024 à 22:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : To reproduce: 1. Open the attached example. 2. Put the cursor just after the Note inset. 3. Press twice. I get a SIGSEGV with the attached backtrace. Can anyone else reproduce on current master? This is now fixed in master at 89901123c579. A

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 11:31 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Fair enough. That was what I was afraid of (and expected). > > Scott A possible mid-term solution, to your use case, is to set the output format of the latest stable version. This would mean that any document is always imported to the

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 06:32:47AM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 16:51 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I imagine others face the same situation? Is there anything that can > > be done? > > No, I think this will be a nightmare to maintain. And then, you really >

Re: Layout file format change proposal

2024-04-07 Thread Lorenzo Bertini
Dear devs, thanks to everyone who chimed in. I didn't understand José's reply until I looked at the lexers we use and found only one. I just didn't occur to me that most files LyX uses are in this same format, documents and configurations alike. This is a considerable advantage of LyX's own

Re: SIGSEGV introduced recently on master when deleting an inset

2024-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Thanks for the bisect. I'll handle it. JMarc Le 7 avril 2024 07:16:17 GMT+02:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller" a écrit : >Am Sonntag, dem 07.04.2024 um 06:50 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: >> Just doing a bisect. > >73678dcde977802d5ff3ae07f0226484041fff48 is the first bad commit >commit