GUI independence

2000-02-22 Thread John Levon
It seems the devel web page is sort of out of date... What work is currently being done on GUI independence ? I understand major changes to the core code have made this easier, but the frontends directory is empty and the lyx-devel module on CVS doesn't seem to have any abstraction from xforms

Re: Porting pop-ups in the rae branch

2000-03-10 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: FINALLY --- and perhaps most importantly for me --- A QUESTION I haven't done anything in the xforms/forms directory, yet all three pop-ups work. Why is the forms directory needed? A. This contains files created by "fdesign". They are used with

Re: Porting pop-ups in the rae branch

2000-03-14 Thread John Levon
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Allan Rae wrote: I don't want every file moved at once and in particular I only want one dialog per .fd file. When a new form is made gui-indep then its .fd should be in the xforms/forms. It doesn't necessarily have to be derived from the old .fd that it may have been

Re: Two bugs and a feature(?)

2000-03-17 Thread John Levon
On 17 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Possibilities: John a) above code is intended default. Add a note in the John documentation about using " " as caption if you want empty, John numbered subfigure captions

Re: Two bugs and a feature(?)

2000-03-17 Thread John Levon
On 17 Mar 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John My point is though that I can't do that. I have to add a " " John which imho is not user-friendly. This is important, right ? I John would prefer to have the caption yes/no

Re: Lyx cores during startup.

2000-03-24 Thread John Levon
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Allan Rae wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In CreateXPM [pixmap.c 303] error converting: (Can't get color) In CreateXPM [pixmap.c 303] error converting: (Can't get color) In CreateXPM [pixmap.c 303] error converting: (Can't get color) lyx:

Two-colour icons

2000-04-03 Thread John Levon
Does anyone actually use the two-colour icon feature ? What's the point of it ? Surely the xpm colours are allocated read-only (i.e. shared) anyway ? I think it should be possible anyway to use the full-colour icons as two-colour and with some Xpm jiggery pokery. would anyone object to doing

Re: Two-colour icons

2000-04-03 Thread John Levon
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote: John Levon wrote: Does anyone actually use the two-colour icon feature ? What's the point of it ? Surely the xpm colours are allocated read-only (i.e. shared) anyway ? I think it should be possible anyway to use the full-colour icons

segfault

2000-04-04 Thread John Levon
I got a segfault last night with fairly recent 1.1.5cvs simply by loading a figure in a float and setting the height to 60 inches. big picture, but lyx shouldn't segfault I didn't have time to collect details but I think it should be reproducable anyway, so ... thanks john -- "I swear by my

Re: lyx.org route problem

2000-04-07 Thread John Levon
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: Hi everyone, Is there something wrong with the network that lyx.org is attached to? cvs [update aborted]: connect to anoncvs.lyx.org:2401 failed: No route to host ---Kayvan I can't reach it at all today ... its

Re: lyx.org route problem

2000-04-07 Thread John Levon
On 7 Apr 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The machine cvs.lyx.org is up and running. However, aussie.lyx.org (aka anoncvs.lyx.org, aka www.lyx.org) does not work. I just put a copy of the FAQ at http://www-rocq.inria.fr/~lasgoutt/lyx/FAQ.lyx JMarc thanks, I can have a look at the FAQ

Re: Edit View Latex Log File

2000-04-11 Thread John Levon
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Ben Cazzolato wrote: Kayvan et al Hmmm... Are you able to package this up as a small example for me to reproduce? Is it repeatable? I've never seen anything like you describe. :-( No real point trying to package up an example as it is the same with every

Why no bugzilla ?

2000-05-24 Thread John Levon
I couldn't find a bugs page ... I wanted to see if the click-on-refs==crash bug of 1.1.5pre2 had been fixed in pre3 ... is it just lack of time/resources ? thanks john

Re: Some bug reports

2005-05-21 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:05:03PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: 4. Accept All Changes and Revert All Changes should be atomic operations; otherwise undo is a real pain This one's filed already john

Re: [PATCH 1.4] user interface, 2nd try

2005-05-21 Thread John Levon
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: John, speak to us - we are awaiting your approval. I just got off a long couple of flights from the US, I'm afraid you must wait a little longer until I can see properly :) john

Re: LyX frontends

2005-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:44:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: could actually drop with Qt 4 MVC. What bits become unnecessary? Qt 4 uses MVC for e.g. tree views, list views, tables, comboboxes... I don't think LyX structure will be affected. However, in addition to Then would we really

Re: [PATCH] More text changes

2005-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:38:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: some more text message changes. This patch (almost) finishes my cleanup. This is fine john

Re: [PATCH 1.4] user interface, 2nd try

2005-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:47:05PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: John, speak to us - we are awaiting your approval. The edit menu should be kept as short as possible since it's the second most commonly used after 'Insert'. In particular, the open/close insets stuff needs to go into the View

Re: [PATCH 1.4] user interface, 2nd try

2005-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote: Ok, another patch. This time without the controversial inset-toggle stuff. Please apply. Applied. thanks, john

Re: 1.4 microbug in change tracking, merge changes... starts out blank

2005-07-04 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:37:21PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: I thought ctime returns translated strings if LC_TIME is set correctly? Obviously not the case. strftime is the right thing, probably. regards john

Re: 1.4 microbug in change tracking, merge changes... starts out blank

2005-07-04 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 05:28:07PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: + struct tm * chng_tm = localtime(c.changetime); + char date[50]; + strftime(date, sizeof(date), + lyxrc.date_insert_format.c_str(), chng_tm); + return string(date); I can't help but feel that

Re: [Cvslog] lyx-devel src/: ChangeLog text.C

2005-07-06 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:56:40AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log message: get your ruler out, John! button insets are centered again [bug 1293] Ah, gentle mockery ... thanks :) john

[PATCH] fix compile with gcc 4.0

2005-07-18 Thread John Levon
I needed the below to compile. john Index: src/text2.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/text2.C,v retrieving revision 1.623 diff -u -a -p -r1.623 text2.C --- src/text2.C 18 Jul 2005 11:00:12 - 1.623 +++

Re: [PATCH] fix compile with gcc 4.0

2005-07-18 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:35:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: -int const col = c - row.pos(); +pos_type const col = c - row.pos(); I just committed the fix. So much for retirement :) Tricked you :) The very retired john

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-19 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:54:39AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1920 It would be nice if someone could test this. Works like a dream. Would that every problem were so nice to fix :) regards john

[PATCH] fix for bug 1748

2005-07-19 Thread John Levon
This looks truly trivial to me... can I apply it? regards john 1748 left-edge border is set when multicolmun is applied in tabular material Index: src/tabular.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/tabular.C,v

File-Import-LaTeX borked?

2005-07-19 Thread John Levon
If I try this, then: 1. if there's no corresponding .lyx - an empty document 2. if there is a corresponding .lyx - an empty document Either way, I don't get an imported file in lyx! Isn't this a rather nasty bug :) regards john

Re: File-Import-LaTeX borked?

2005-07-19 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:41:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus Will that work? Not if tex2lyx is spawned by forkedcall. We Angus have no code to redirect the stdout stream. It will work if we Angus use systemcall though... Then tex2lyx needs a new option to specify the output

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:56:53AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Shoot in the dark: does it work with change tracking? This erasing one at a time (and erasing the contents first) was there to track changes I seem to remember. I tried it and it seemed to work john

Re: File-Import-LaTeX borked?

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:55:46AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: In the tmpdir right? Bad if we end up overwriting an existing filename.lyx ... But that was the case with reLyX, too. If you don't want that, remove the -f option from the command in configure.m4. Can't we take the opportunity

wiki

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
what's the username/pass? I'm going to add to the what's new for multiple toolbars and change tracking... regards john

Re: wiki

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:26:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: John what's the username/pass? I'm going to add to the what's new for John multiple toolbars and change tracking... Pass is LyXers, name is whatever Thanks. What about for uploading files? john

New in LyX 1.4

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
I updated: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX14 for everything I had a hand in. Somebody needs to write some stuff about translated Chapter and whatever changed in math (something did, I'm sure). Anything else big? cheers john

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:31:58PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: I was afraid of this chunk of your patch - pars[pit].erase(0, pars[pit].size()); John seems to have tested it, so it probably works. It would be cool to I lied :( I must have tested the wrong lyx. The fix

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:46:03PM +0100, John Levon wrote: I must have tested the wrong lyx. The fix is a lot more painful than this. We can trivially skip the slow bit if we're not change tracking the document. The question is what do we do if we /are/ change tracking. We could copy

Re: New in LyX 1.4

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:50:27PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: Not sure it qualifies as big, but I added error lists I added a screenshot :) john

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:24:54PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: We can trivially skip the slow bit if we're not change tracking the document. That would be enough for 1.4 I guess. That'd be OK. We could copy the entire list, skipping empty paragraphs after doing the erase(0,

Re: New in LyX 1.4

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:59:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I am not sure what the part about charactr styles tries to demonstrate, though. I suppose it at least indicates that LyX will have this properly cracked not too long after 1.4.0 regards john

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:01:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:46:03PM +0100, John Levon wrote: We can trivially skip the slow bit if we're not change tracking the document. The question is what do we do if we /are/ change tracking. Could you explain _why_

[PATCH] bug 1757 (and a bit of 1756)

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
This fixes things such that you can't edit deleted tables or other insettexts. To do this, we introduce an indirection of inset::getStatus() - inset::doGetStatus(), where the former checks for the erased_ member, and whether the lfun is read only or not. This is less than perfect unfortunately,

Re: [PATCH] bug 1757 (and a bit of 1756)

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:31:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Why isn't it possible to do that at an higher level in LyXFunc::getStatus? Isn't it possible to know directly that the pointer is in a change-deleted part? How do I find out the current inset in the new world? Is all

Re: Patch for bug #1920

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:40:42AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What about this patch, then? It is like the old code, except that it deletes stuff by chunks. It is still slower than Lars' solution, so I guess we could short-circuit it when change tracking is not enabled. Looks OK to

[PATCH] bug 1757 redux

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
OK, I worked out how to use the cursor. Please comment/test regards john Index: lyxfunc.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C,v retrieving revision 1.663 diff -u -a -p -r1.663 lyxfunc.C --- lyxfunc.C 16

[PATCH] bug 1939

2005-07-20 Thread John Levon
I don't really know what I'm doing here, but this smells like old code that's no longer necessary, and is actively bad. I can't find any problem with my change. The setCursor() call was terribly dubious. regards john Index: text2.C

Re: Boost - note 1.33.0 - will be in 1.4.0

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | So? How does either point justify you unilaterally breaking the freeze that | you yourself imposed? Because this has been decided a long time ago. (And no, I don't tell you of every decision I make) So perhaps you

[PATCH] change tracking changes, revised

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
This version includes basic support for making math formulae non-editable. Andre, please look it over thanks john Index: lyxfunc.C === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C,v retrieving revision 1.663 diff -u -a

math hull inset

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
Hmm, it stil claims to be the interface between lyx and mathed, but this isn't true. Andre, it looks like I have to add an erased_ bool to every math inset and populate it? Or can I get the outer inset somehow and make an erased() find that one? john

Re: [PATCH] change tracking changes, revised

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Why don't you add the editable() stuff directly to InsetBase? Both math and normal insets derive from that these days. There's a nasty comment saying I'm not allowed to add data members regards john

selecting latex math?

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
Is it intentional that I can no longer select latex and press control-M to get mathed to parse it? regards john

Re: [PATCH] change tracking changes, revised

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:56:57PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: John There's a nasty comment saying I'm not allowed to add data John members Indeed :) What kind of support do you want to obtain anyway? You do not plan to support change tracking _inside_ insets, I guess? Sure I do, it

Re: selecting latex math?

2005-07-21 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 06:00:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I can somewhat make it work by typing a=5 selecting and then C-m, but it seems to create two math insets. And I thought we were supposed to add the $ $ around the string. Ah, the $ $ was causing Tokens: [$,3] #

Re: [Patch] bug 1814 (scrollbar borkage)

2005-07-25 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 07:46:39PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: This is the nature of our bug. The fix is to increase the grey area seen when scrolling to the bottom, from 25% to 75%. Then this This is not a fix at all but an (unpleasant) workaround... but we can live with it. john

Re: [Patch] bug 1814 (scrollbar borkage)

2005-07-25 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:33:22PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: If you like... it is as good as we can do without knowing the true height of every paragraph... which we have chosen not to. Not elegant, but will have to do. Yes, this is what I mean to say in my quite brutish way. BTW I

Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-25 Thread John Levon
I still need an OK for: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-develm=112195874122996w=2 Andre doesn't seem to be about so my half-solution for math will do for now. It's better than the previous state... regards john

Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-26 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:43:58AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Can you explain to me again why it is necessary to mark insets as erased? I would think that a test for whether we block modifications would be something like !cur.inTexted() { there exists a slice of the cursor that is

Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-26 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:42:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: My problem is that I do not know exactly in which cases editing should be disabled in case of change tracking. Could you describe that? If my parent inset's pos is marked as deleted, then I should also be. That's all. For

Re: [Patch] bug 1814 (scrollbar borkage)

2005-07-26 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:52:27AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: s/brutish/british/ ? The upper class has something with their vowels... Well thank you for even considering the idea that I might be upper class! What about the other scrollbar bug targetted at 1.4.0? Do you have an idea

Re: [patch] Bug 1937: undo of table cut is losing data

2005-07-28 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:38:01AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Please get someone to test it. If the test turns out ok, please commit. OK. John, can you test if this cures the undo woes? Yep, but maybe not a for a couple of days john

Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-28 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:53:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Here is how I would do it. Note that this patch is only the getStatus part, but the lookupChange(Dociterator) is generally useful and could be moved somewhere else. With that, it will be possible to show the OK. Can you

Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-28 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:55:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I'd prefer to understand first what we are trying to do :) If markErased is applied recursively, there should be no need for this nifty function, isn't it? Ignore the existence of my version of the patch: this is about

Re: [patch] bug 1939: Assertion triggered in void LyXText::setCursor

2005-07-28 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:07:11PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: InsertStringAsLines has set the Cursor with the lastpos of the last paragraph, but _in_ the first paragraph: pit and pos from two different paragraphs had been used. Therefore, LyX asserted when the last paragraph was

Re: [patch] bug 1939: Assertion triggered in void LyXText::setCursor

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:21:50AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I noted that after I have done the patch, and I didn't notice your patch, that's why I sent it. But I didn't intend to step on your toes. No problem, just seems a bit of a waste of our time which is surely precious :) I

Re: New in LyX 1.4 - and a (small?) feature request

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:10:33PM +0200, Janus Sandsgaard wrote: Oh, with change tracking in LyX 1.4 maybe it is time to look at a new spellcheck as you type spell checker? :-) That would require quite a big rejig of the spell checking code, which is not anybody's favourite part of LyX ...

Re: New bugzilla component please -- Windows installer

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:53:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: While you're at it, add Windows to the Platform and OS comboboxes. Windows is there (you're the second person to not see it ... weird). Adding windows installer now. john

Re: New bugzilla component please -- Windows installer

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:45:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: I think it's because the combox has the Mac entries at the top when first shown. You have to scroll *up* to find the Windows entries. Well that sucks. Pity I can't do anything about it. I added 'windows-installer' for you . john

Re: Bugzilla confusion

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:23:46PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: If I query a target of 1.3.3 I get 1227 If I query a target of 1.3.6 I get 1343 1384 But, if I go to the appropriate bug page, I can find the Version: combox but not the Target: one. How do I upgrade the target of these

Re: [Bug 1311] no DESM in math text mode

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:54:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Bug 1311] no DESM in math text mode

2005-07-29 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:07:17PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Hmm do we all really need to do this? Isn't the state being 'NEW' good enough to show there's no work being done? While we are at it: I wonder why AssignedTo is not automatically set to my address if I chose ASSIGNED?

Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-31 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:22:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Now I am wondering. One big advantage of your patch is that it allows to mark individual table cells as deleted. This _requires_ to have the erased_ inset member, I guess. Why do we ever want that? I don't think it makes

Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-07-31 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 03:45:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: John Why do we ever want that? I don't think it makes sense as a user John interface. Are you thinking of expanding this for future support John or add/delete row/col ? Well, I just though this is what we will eventually

Re: [new PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-08-03 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:22:31PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 1) lyxfunc.C: fix bug 1757, by disabling non-readonly commands in DELETED text. This is not fool-proof since (1) some commands are not correctly disabled (type backspace at the end of a DELETED range) and (2) some

Re: [new PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-08-03 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:33:45PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Ahh, now I remember why this code was here :) Fixed patch attached (3 chars removed). I'll (hopefully) test it this weekend john

Re: --enable-stdlib-debug can have huge effects

2005-08-04 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: yes I think so, and we should already know to not use this for profiling builds. Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by default - daily use of the latest LyX is how much stuff gets caught.

Re: Spelling Spellchecker

2005-08-04 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:21:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: msgid Spell command:|#S Name of spellchecker executable: Bit wordy. Spellchecker command ? msgid Check spelling Check the spelling ? Hmm really ? john

Re: --enable-stdlib-debug can have huge effects

2005-08-04 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 05:21:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by | default - daily use of the latest LyX is how much stuff gets caught. turn off all debuging if trying to gauge whre LyX is wrt performance. As with

Re: Spelling Spellchecker

2005-08-04 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:59:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: Bit wordy. Spellchecker command ? I'd like to get the idea of executable in there somehow. The offending widget is permanently disabled in the Windows port because we force these users to use the [ap]spell library. Harumph.

Re: --enable-stdlib-debug can have huge effects

2005-08-05 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | It's impossible to achieve both testing of performance and debugging | then. I can't run two LyXes at once you know. You've chosen debugging | when we're not in a heavy surgery phase, bit in a tweaks and fixes | stage.

Re: [Patch] Workaround crash in gtk/xftFontMetrics.C

2005-08-13 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:56:22PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Btw, I don't really like BOOST_ASSERT (as well as the 'traditional' ASSERT) as it does not offer a possibility to specify what should happen in the failure case. Most failure conditions are not critical for the appliction, but

Re: Ad. Boost 1.33.

2005-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:40:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: What is missing for a 1.4 release now? I'd be happy for the current 1.4 targetted bug list to get fixed (and any real stoppers). Things are looking really good for me. regards john

Re: [Patch] Workaround crash in gtk/xftFontMetrics.C

2005-08-14 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: An assertion signals that something is wrong; by their very nature we cannot be positive as to what the issue is. In particular the risk of silent corruption becomes a lot larger. Not if we tell the user and give him a choice

Re: Cut Paste in tables is broken!

2005-09-01 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:39:54AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: 1. Create a new 5x5 table 2. Fill the cells in the first two rows with some random content 3. Cut the content of the fourth column (cells in 1st and 2rd row) 4. Cut some text from the first cell in row 1 5. Paste it into

Re: [new PATCH] Re: [PATCH] Re: Reminder: patch for bug 1757, bug 1939

2005-09-01 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:31:18AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: John, did you find the time to test this patch? Sorry, I'm waayy too busy... john

Re: Qt toolbar prettiness

2005-09-07 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:46:00AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: The attached patch implements this for LyX 1.3.x. Thoughts? What happens if the real widgets extend right to the edge already? You don't get the thing do you? If not, fine. regards john

Re: LyX status.

2005-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: Searching in bugzilla I get 4 critical bugs targeted to 1.4.0, is the objective to have no critical bugs before releasing pre1? I thought the purpose of setting target milestone for any bug was must be fixed. Maybe there's

Re: LyX status.

2005-09-09 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: Searching in bugzilla I get 4 critical bugs targeted to 1.4.0, is the objective to have no critical bugs before releasing pre1? Ooops, I just saw pre1. Please ignore me... john

Scroll wheel etc. with this doc

2005-09-25 Thread John Levon
Admittedly, an unusual doc (Justin is using notes as a kind of outliner), and my binary is old, but scrolling through this doc with the wheel exhibits all sorts of weirdness (obviously, the scroll bar is utterly wrong, but it also gets 'stuck' at certain points, and jumps erratically etc.)

Re: Scroll wheel etc. with this doc

2005-09-25 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:22:45AM +0100, John Levon wrote: Admittedly, an unusual doc (Justin is using notes as a kind of Which is: http://trollied.org/~movement/math.lyx regards john

Re: Scroll wheel etc. with this doc

2005-09-25 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:22:45AM +0100, John Levon wrote: Worse, the drawing (which is very slow of course) has some serious problems. First, the not so bad: http://trollied.org/~movement/lyx-1.3.6.notes.jpg http://trollied.org/~movement/lyx-1.4.notes.jpg Why are we mis-drawing

Re: [Patch] Re: Scroll wheel etc. with this doc

2005-09-27 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:58:58AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: You can now... it has other problems though, being quietly deformed and truncated upon load. A lyx2lyx problem, surely. Also when going to the end of the truncated part, it pushes the CPU to 98% and freezes up. I assumed this was

Re: [Patch] Re: Scroll wheel etc. with this doc

2005-09-27 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:04:11PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Thanks, I got it myself now, re-typing yout text from the screenshot. I see it, but I'm not sure whether I should dislike it. Surely it's a bug that we extend past the right border? john

Re: [Patch] Re: Scroll wheel etc. with this doc

2005-09-27 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:08:43PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Surely it's a bug that we extend past the right border? We don't. That's what I just fixed. Ah, sorry john

Re: Applying Patches

2005-09-28 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: http://wiki.lyx.org/devel/pmwiki.php/DevelFAQ/UsingPatches Is this your new wiki engine in action? It's looking very nice! I wonder if we could rewrite the URLs so we don't have to see the (spurious) pmwiki.php john

1.5.0 bugs

2005-10-07 Thread John Levon
I just re-targeted a bunch of 1.5.0 bugs back to 1.4.1 for 1.4 series consideration. 1.5.0 is likely a long away so for smaller issues we shold consider a 1.4 era fix; thus, I put them on the radar. Feel free to re-target back again if you disagree. I think we should consider setting putative

Re: LyX speedup patch

2005-10-08 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:28:02PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: However, I don't think we need to handle 125k pars very often. However, large paragraphs as a result of the branch inset are to be expected. regards john

Re: [Bug 1932] Update boost to version 1.33.0

2005-10-09 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:03:56PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote: IIRC we only use a fraction of the complete boost library. Are the changes to that fraction also large? I think that a class like iterator or shared_ptr shouldn't change dramatically. If we can come up with an actual practical

Re: 1.5.0 bugs

2005-10-10 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: How can we get the list of bugs you re-targeted? I'd like to target to I don't know, I should have added a search keyword. It was only about 6. 1.4.1 only the bugs we intend to fix for 1.4.1 itself. We should maybe have a

Re: ICU - uneasy feeling

2005-10-13 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:29:30PM +0200, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: The reason I suggest a unicode inset is that we already have it: the latex accent inset. Our inset infrastructure is not in a position to accomodate something like this. languages if volunteers come and help out. Don't

Re: ICU - uneasy feeling

2005-10-13 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:41:32AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: John Levon wrote: This seems a horribly euro-centric point of view. (Says the guy who can only speak one language...) Really? Which one? Northern. john

Re: ICU - uneasy feeling

2005-10-14 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:58:01AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | This seems a horribly euro-centric point of view. (Says the guy who can | only speak one language...) I agree with that, but I also agree with Asger, that this won't be much worse than what we have right now. And we do

Re: RFC: GThesaurus.C et al.

2005-10-14 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:41:40PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: KDE Artists (Authors of several of the icons) Isn't KDE already GPL'd ? Therefore by merely shipping the icons with our software, we never changed their licenses anyway. regards john

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >