Does someone of you have some experience with valgring?
==30304== Invalid read of size 4
==30304==at 0x8139486: Row::previous(void) const (lyxrow.C:112)
==30304==by 0x816E337: LyXText::draw(LyXText::DrawRowParams &, int &) (text.C:650)
==30304==by 0x8179678: LyXText::paintRowText(LyXT
On 23-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> tir, 2002-04-23 kl. 11:18 skrev Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> If you have time, you may want to try our valgrind
>> http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/
>
> I tried it by simply invoking 'valgrind lyx'. The crash did NOT happen
Sorry again what version of LyX
On 23-Apr-2002 jug wrote:
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl.C
> BufferView_pimpl.h ChangeLog
>
> Log message:
> Remove wrong and unneeded insetSleep/Wakeup functions.
This fixes the bug that the cursor is set to t
On 23-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> tir, 2002-04-23 kl. 14:10 skrev Juergen Vigna:
>> Sorry again what version of LyX are you using? Are you using the current
>> cvs tree? I seem to see differences in the backtraces valgrind gives and
>> the sourcecode (for example ther
On 24-Apr-2002 Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the latest cvs.
>
> Right clicking any math environment while the cursor isn't inside it
> brings the math panel up as expected, but then tring to insert any symbol
> with it will lead to a crash.
Andre I think you forget t
On 24-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> > Right clicking any math environment while the cursor isn't inside it
>> > brings the math panel up as expected, but then tring to insert any symbol
>>
On 24-Apr-2002 Lasgouttes, J.M. wrote:
> Juergen, I see you did not fix it_Customization.lyx. COuld you do it?
Yes I will have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
On 24-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That's kind of you.
#:O)
> But what is the additional 'if !mathcursor' in 'case 1' good for?
>
> If we click in an inset for the very first time, we need to create the
> cursor. Or is this done in the edit() call?
>
> As I said, I am lost...
What do you
On 24-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I'll attach you the file I have not enough karma to commit it myself.
Umm, sorry I should have send a patch!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL P
Lars could you please explain me the wheel_jump value? Shouldn't it be
a value in % of the workarea-height? As it is now it seems that it is
the number of rows to scroll, but then we have a hack in scrollDown
which set's this to the workarea-height - (defaultHeight)! IMO this
is pretty stupid. IMO
On 24-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| Lars could you please explain me the wheel_jump value? Shouldn't it be
>| a value in % of the workarea-height? As it is now it seems that it is
>| the number of rows to scroll,
On 26-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> 1) It took long time when lyx changed line by line, took that blue
>> underscore away.
>
> I would like to reemphasize this! Try it with the user's guide; it took 20
> secs on my pIII 600.
>
> 1. open users guide
> 2. change language in document dialog
> 3
On 28-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Can be done with gcc 3.1 and glibc:
[snip]
You mean localize certain "WorkArea" strings (labels) on the selected
document language?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-M
On 29-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> With emacs-bindings, type M-x
Well I guess with cua too. But I guess that won't be the solution :)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
On 29-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
>| it.
>
> I can agree with that.
It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it doesn't
seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it
On 29-Apr-2002 Soeren Pietsch wrote:
> Juergen> can always use an office software ;)
>
> he you are not the only one! But one can always drop LyX in favor for
> vi and write pure LaTeX ;)
#:O)
> I personally skipped 1.1.6 and stick with 1.1.5. I have hope that
> 1.2.x will be usable again.
I
On 24-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> ons, 2002-04-24 kl. 15:27 skrev John Levon:
>> > Did that help?
>>
>> No ! Look at the backtrace yourself then look at the source they are
>> completely different. Perhaps a valgrind bug ?
Thanks for your backtraces (and patience). Would it be possible fo
Well as the subject tells us this should fix #350
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://w
Another one for people to have a look at!
Jug
P.S.: Q: Why are you sending all this simple patches to the list?
A: I don't want to risk my "karma" commiting them :P
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PR
On 29-Apr-2002 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> You are so afraid that you even forgot to send the patch. ;-)
No I sent the mail with attachment this version was not supposed to
arrive. Well I killed sendmail to late, anyway you might be right ;)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
The last one for today have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
On 29-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> By request, I have obtained the following backtraces from valgrind
> (attached) and gdb from a LyX 1.2.0CVS of today with Juergens patch
> applied compiled with --disable-optimization. They were both made doing
> the same thing as in my prior backtraces.
[s
On 29-Apr-2002 John Levon wrote:
> I'm building with it now. Can you tell us how we could trigger the
> bug to see it's fixed ? Do you know ?
No I don't, therefore I said "should" (but I'm pretty confident seeing the
backtrace of the bug it can only be that we are going behind the paragraph
and
On 29-Apr-2002 John Levon wrote:
> Start a new par, and set it to Subsection. Now insert an index list
> in this par (this will reset to Standard). Now click before the index
> button, and reset it to Subsection. Now start typing. Observe drawing
> errors as the cursor is somehow on the line abo
On 29-Apr-2002 Mate Wierdl wrote:
> application/pdf
> application/postscript
> application/x-compress
> application/x-dvi
> application/x-latex
> application/x-tar
> application/x-tex
> image/gif
> image/jpeg
> image/png
> Plese leave/add those you want in the list, then I will implement it.
> I
On 30-Apr-2002 Rod Pinna wrote:
> Nothing in particular. Just if I have 20 or so floats, and do a spell
> check, then then are all opened. I tend to prefer to work with them all
> closed. I find it much easier to concentrate on the text.
They remain opened if you find some errors inside, isn't
On 30-Apr-2002 R. Lahaye wrote:
> Oh, is there another mailinglist for discussing bugs, apart from lyx-devel?
> It's getting really complicated then
I find this too sometimes a bit annoying especially if I want to publicy
discuss a problem on lyx-devel I have to recopy the discussion and op
On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
>> layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a valid layout a bit early in
>> buffer.C... so that the compability reading do
I want a confirmation for any patch I send to the list. I now don't assume silence
is agreement. So Lars tell me "ok" and I'll commit tell me "nok" and I forget about
the patch AND the bug, tell me how you think it should be correctly fix (if you don't
have the time to do it yourself) and I'll hav
On 30-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> You could just move your current source tree to, say, lyx-devel-for-1.3, do
> a second checkout on lyx-devel and work there.
>
> Andre', having four of these beasts hanging arounf by now
I know and I have at least 6 of them araound (a lot of them for o
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> I found these and thing they should be changed.
>>> Does the following patch look ok?
>>
>| Dunno if it's this patch, but here's one
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And this is a different bug from the one I answered to, right?
Nope! I copied it from your reply to this patch!
> Anyway I think your patch looks ok.
I'll commit this one then!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On 30-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> It crashes also without your crash but I sent already a patch to fix
^patch
but you surely did understand what I meant, didn't you ;)
Jug
P.S.: In 10 minutes I'm gone so commits for not yet confir
On 01-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok, this is a bug, but it also is a case of "do not do that then".
> First of al it should not be allowed to change the layout of the par
> where the index resides. Also no text should be allowed with the
> indexlist inset at all...
I told this alread
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> well... then Jürgens patch will not apply.
Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out too?
On 30-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> Sorry, no luck with the new patch
Ok thanks for the file I can recreate the crash with it and your explanation.
I fixed this now hopefully but there is IMO a greater problem to fix in GCItem.
(this is for Angus)
IMO that this function is wrong:
void GCac
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
>| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
>| if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out too?
>
> It did the same thing as yours + moved
Well to make it short I agree with John. For me it's VERY interesting and
helpfull to have the whole buglist there. On the other side I really seldom
let it list "ALL" bugs I just let it list "My Bugs" in which I also include
bugs I have a Cc: or any bug I did comment on.
And I think if a bug is
On 01-May-2002 Mike Alonzo wrote:
> im running LyX in a debian system. i use CUPS as my
> print manager. When I print, this error comes up:
>
> lp: unable to print file: client-error-not-found
>
> where do you think is the problem? CUPS daemon is listening
> but it just won't print..
Do
Are you sure that you want % instead of >>, if not the below fixes this
misguided change. I seem to have heard that patches should be sent to the
list, but it seems this is requested only for a few persons. And then the
one who did commit the below did not mind to test it eighter. I think if
one i
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> bla bla...
#:O)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web:
The attached patch fixes the problem that in case of a cursor move and
following DEPM the maintext is also repainted.
Jug
P.S.: What is with the patch for #348 is it ok to apply. I would like to know as
both of this patches are in BufferView_pimpl.C.
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ...and I belive I posted several versions of this fix on the list
> yesterday.
>
> ...except the last one of course.
First of all yesterday was a public Holiday, so you cannot pretend people
looking at email. Second you tell us that we are allowed to
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| The attached patch fixes the problem that in case of a cursor move and
>| following DEPM the maintext is also repainted.
>
> I guess that this cannot harm anyting.
The only th
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> ...and I belive I posted several versions of this fix on the list
>>> yesterday.
>>>
>>
>| F
On 03-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> don't know.
> here it comes
Rob please head that when applying patches which change the fileformat of
a .lyx file you always risk that you can never read them again with a "real"
lyx. We may put the patch into cvs, but most probably not for 1.2.0 and
we can
On 03-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> why does this patch changes the file format?
Oh sorry I didn't look at the patch, but I thought that implementing
stuff like frontmatter,backmatter would also change something in the
fileformat (that you save some information in the .lyx file). If it
isn't l
On 03-May-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Which is even a bigger problem, since now the output of the document changes
> without a warning to the user!
Anyway I agree with Jean-Marc that the change IS needed and I don't think
we will go back to the old behaviour. People editing the LaTeX preamble by
h
I just had a look at the bug list and don't see anything which should be fixed
for 1.2.0. The only incompatibility with 1.1.6 is still that we forget about the
paragrap-extra "indent" stuff (we loose this information). This is actually an
added "left-indent" for the whole paragraph (not only the f
On 07-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I disagree. What about all the compatibility issues ?
>
> they seem to be minor.
What about the patch for the "indent paragraph" code I sent? I didn't
see any comments from you?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On 07-May-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 May 2002 1:15 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> On 07-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >| I disagree. What about all the compatibility issues ?
>> >
>> > they seem to be minor.
>>
>> What about
On 07-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| What about the patch for the "indent paragraph" code I sent? I didn't
>| see any comments from you?
>
> Can you please send it again so I have an updated version?
Here we go.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.
On 07-May-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>>
>> -string const paragraphindent_def =
>> -"\\newenvironment{LyXParagraphIndent}[1]%\n"
>> +string const paragraphleftindent_def =
>> +"\\newenvironment{LyXParagraphLeftIndent}[1]%\n"
>> "{\n"
>> " \\begin{list}{}{%\n"
>> "\\setlen
On 07-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> read the attached demo file with 1.2.0 and you'll see that the
> \vspace{0.4cm} is no more in texmode.
Ok IMO this is a really small C&P bug this is the patch:
--start-patch--
Index: src/buffer.C
===
On 10-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> I tried a lot and there is only a minor problem, which I can live with:
Well you don't have too ;)
> After a series of ert's LyX sets the next paragraph to Standard and
> not to the actual one.
Yes I forgot that if I don't have to create a new paragraph I
On 10-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
[sniped horrible english message]
Hope you forgive me I didn't reread the message but as I read it now
it's just horrible english, but I hope you get the meaning anyway.
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| So you can't use the same filename when LyX should
>| do the converting process.
>
> And this is LyX's problem, and something that we must fix.
Yes, but give us also an idea of how. I would check the directory names
of files and if they differ put a
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is not a real problem is it?
> Can it wait for 1.2.1?
No this is not a big problem. It can wait, but did you have a look at
it? It's a really minor change. But ok if you say we should wait for
1.2.1 I'll open a bug with this and put the patch the
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Are you able to create such a construct, solely from inside LyX?
> If you can then it is a problem, if you cannot there is no mistake on
> our part. Then it is the "cut-and-past"ers fault (playing with the lyx
> format.)
Sure you can. Did you look at
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> This is not a real problem is it?
>>> Can it wait for 1.2.1?
>>
>| No this is not a big problem. It ca
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> when used and stored in the tempdir by lyx:
> home_larsbj_images_somefig.gif
>
> then same fig name does not matter as long as they are in different
> dirs, and if they are in same dirs, and the extension somewhere in the
> name after conversion is do
On 10-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> I think, you'll understand what's going here.
Well you would too if you would have a better look at the file
(also on screen inside 1.1.6). There are parts inside the LaTeX
stuff which are NOT LaTeX (you see that they are black!). So I
guess the reading is p
On 10-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> Okay, Jürgen, than your patch works from my point of
> view pretty well and makes other users happy, too.
Do I have a go on this?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAI
On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
> for non highly editable insets.
This is a "real" bugfix! Comments please!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> The attached patch fixes misbehaviour with the keepempty layouts and
> breakParagraph mechanism.
This needs to go into 1.2.0 IMO. Comments please!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>>> for non highly editable insets.
>>
>| This i
On 10-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On 09-May-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>> The attached patch fixes misbehaviour with the keepempty layouts and
>>> breakParagraph mechanism.
>>
>| This needs to go
On 11-May-2002 John Levon wrote:
>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>> for non highly editable insets.
>
> Yes, works for me.
>
> btw, the two-dialogs on right click bug is back *again* :(
???
Where?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
On 13-May-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> > Not really as long as we document it.
>>
>> I agree completely. When should we change behaviour if not with a
>> new release?
>
> The old behaviour was
On 13-May-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:42:42PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> Here is a patch that fixes the problem.
>> It is quite simple.
>
> I think a better way would be to return with 'UNDISPATCHED' from mathed's
> dispatch(). Otherwise you start putting mathed speci
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>
>>> This patch fixes #387 as the insettext should not call the edit() call
>>> for non highly e
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And that also helped the bug-reporters?
??? I don't understand what you mean here.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fa
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| ??? I don't understand what you mean here.
>
> A double-open bug was reproted, you claim that the patch you checked
> in should fix this, and I wonder it got fixed for the original
> reporter as well.
I fail to see the double open bug? What bugs are
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I fail to see the double open bug? What bugs are you refering too?
>| If you mean that there is another bug open which tells us that we're
>| only opening the tabular-layout if we click on a insetUrl in another
>| cell then this is a different matter
On 13-May-2002 Walter H. van Holst wrote:
> - Searching text is incredibly slow. The whole searching process seems
> to be displayed in slow-motion, including expansion and collapsing all
> footnotes.
We know and this will probably not change for 1.2.x.
> - I have managed to freeze LyX by sele
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I am fairly convinced that we would have a better CVS version today if we
>| had just kept moving as in the months before the freeze had there been not
>| that goal of a "perfect 1.2" hanging around. Basically we wasted three
>| months of time to gain
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> These are the patches under consideration:
>
The only patches I have open are:
(real bugfixes which should go in IMO)
fixbug387.patch
fixbug390.patch
And one which you decided should go in only in 1.2.1:
ertlabel.patch
Some of the patches you have
Well I think I'm not able to reply him. So the ones which regarded this
as being the choosen way may be able to reply him.
Jug
-Fwd: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-
Date: 13 May 2002 12:32:52 -
From: bugzilla-daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: jug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Bug 393] T
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> These are now the patches up for consideration,
> Id like to know which ones are tested and working, and also absolutely
> needed in 1.2.0. Several of these also miss a Changelog.
Well same as my pre
On 13-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well same as my previous mail.
>
> And do you have ChangeLogs in all of yours?
No I normally add ChangeLogs before I commit. This are trivial patches
so you should understand what they do by the comments I added and by
the patch themselfs.
Anyway d
On 14-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Anyway do you want me to commit both? They are needed anyway, now or
>| later. If we apply them now we will get less User complaints ;)
>
> Put them in now.
I put in #387 and #390 and left the ertlabel update patch for 1.2.1.
Jug
--
-._-._
On 14-May-2002 Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Maybe someone can help me here. It's kind of urgent.
>
> I have two minipages, side by side, with some unordered lists inside each
> minipage.
Well you give the minipage a width of 0pt how would you draw the stuff
inside if you don't have the width to do
On 14-May-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
>> \begin_inset Minipage
>> position 1
>> inner_position 0
>> height ""
>> width "50%"
>> collapsed false
>> Senior Software Configuration Management
Well it seems this is read wrong isn't it? I had 0pt in the
width box of the minipage when I read the resume f
On 15-May-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I see this but don't know how to fix it. I always thaought the (Changed)
> mark was triggered by calls to bv->insetLockedCursorUndo(...), but this
> does not help...
>
> Anybody willing to help out?
The changed flag is set by the bv->updateInset(inset, boo
On 16-May-2002 John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:14:05PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> But will mean that you can take people along with you. Dumping a huge change
>> on us will mean that you're the only one who knows what's going on at all.
>
> Perhaps. But bear in mind that in
On 17-May-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found out that on my computer the character ² and ³ (superscript
> 2 and 3 entered on the keyboard as "^" plus "2" or "3") renders wrongly
> in the dvi, ps, and pdf output from LyX; they are mangled into two
> different accented "S"'s.
> The
On 17-May-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> What defines my "default" encoding? As a Dane, I generally use iso8859-1
> (Latin1), but something must be wrong.
Default is the one of you LaTeX installation and it normally isn't latin1
(as for US latin1 does not work well ;)
Jug
--
-._-._-.
On 17-May-2002 Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> (as for US latin1 does not work well ;)
>>
> That's news to me. Can you elaborate? I use latin1 because I a sometimes
> need french accents and have not seen any problems, whereas nothing ever
> s
On 17-May-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> How clever is "auto"? Would it make a better default for LyX than
> "default"?
I think yes "auto" should be the default thing, but let's see what
out experts say.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr.
On 21-May-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The attached 1.1.6 file is not read correctly by LyX:
> Note that the ERT text contains a backslash and a space,
> so the latex output is "a\ b".
> However, lyx-1.2.0 drops the space when reading the file, so
> the latex output is "a\b" which gives an error.
>
On 21-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Let's get that list going.
First of all I don't know how much time I will have for LyX in future.
Second to tell you the truth for 1.3.0 I plan to ONLY work on GUII complete.
IMO that should be our only "real" 1.3.0 worklist so that we can release a
1
On 21-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "ert_comp.contents.find_first_not_of(' ') == string::npos"
>
> equals only spaces.
>
> So: (perhaps we should use this for 1.2.0 as well)
I already changed to the one you propose and will commit soon (as soon
as I checked out the 1.2.x branch.
On 18-May-2002 michael.schmitt wrote:
> - Create a float with two lines of text inside;
> 1. delete some text in the second line; undo with CTRL-Z;
> press shift-cursor-right -> the wrong text is selected!
> 2. delete some text in the first line; undo with CTRL-Z
> -> segmentation
On 21-May-2002 michael.schmitt wrote:
> Thanks a lot. In fact, I tested it yesterday evening with a fresh cvs
> update and I could not reproduce it either! Obviously, you changed
> something within the last 7 days that fixed the problem.
Good!
> Regarding the patch I would like to ask the ot
On 21-May-2002 michael.schmitt wrote:
> That is not the problem in my case. Anyway, I can live with the
> problems.
Well then I probably didn't understand what you meant.
>> a fast look and this also will remain a known BUG for 1.2.x, this will be
On 23-May-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:07:51AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> > I.e. stuff that has never been in CVS.
>>
>> Oh I see. A branch ? ftp.devel.lyx.org/contrib ?
>
> It does not need to be synced with the main branch... contrib ... hm...
> this is supposed to
Well it seems with "New..." we want now open an old not supported file ;)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mitterstrich 151/A Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39050 Steineg
On 27-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Juergen> Well it seems with "New..." we want now open an old not
>| Juergen> supported file ;) Jug
>>
>| It may be your default.lyx template...
Well whatever it is the message is just plain stupid to me. I create
a "new" file! If this is a problem for
What can we do about this:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../.. -I../../boost
-isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -W -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/lstrings.pp -c lstrings.C
In file included from ../../boost/boost/regex/regex_traits.hpp:28,
from ../../boost/boost/regex
On 27-May-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> Please at least ship a utility which can read 1.1.6 files! One
> Jules> of the reasons that I use free software tools over MS crap is
> Jules> that it is less susceptible to bit-rot. I
101 - 200 of 2676 matches
Mail list logo
