On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:39:58AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand well what you have said. AFAIK, reLyX should not
> touch math, so any latex math expression is already good .lyx code (am I
> right?)
Not all, but quite a bit of it. Definitely
Hi,
I recently found a bug in reLyX that I think is related to th infamous
underscore bug in labels: reLyX simply crash if you have two inline maths
not separed by any character, like $a$$b$ (wich is somewat common in .tex
files generated by scientific workplace). Latex understands this as two
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
Considering that now there is support for regular expressions in C++,
complete rewrite of reLyX in C++ is also a good option. Is there someone
working on this? Or at least planning to work? If so, I would like
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:37:39PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
I think Kayvan wants to write a relyx in python
Yes.
You mentioned pylatex some time ago. Is it any good ?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
Sure enough, these canonical substitutions must be performed,
Probably not. The math parser understands $$ nowadays...
but making
them in a separate phase before parsing (as relyx does) seems to be a
totaly wrong way
, it uses fixed values for deliminiters, so this
can't work except for some class of reasonably well-behaved LaTeX - and
we have reLyX for this job already. At it seems to have the same broken
two-stage process full tokenization/full parsing that the math parser does
- which is not what TeX does.
So
Hi,
I recently found a bug in reLyX that I think is related to th infamous
underscore bug in labels: reLyX simply crash if you have two inline maths
not separed by any character, like $a$$b$ (wich is somewat common in .tex
files generated by scientific workplace). Latex understands this as two
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Considering that now there is support for regular expressions in C++,
> complete rewrite of reLyX in C++ is also a good option. Is there someone
> working on this? Or at least planning to work? If so, I w
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:37:39PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> >
> > I think Kayvan wants to write a relyx in python
> >
>
> Yes.
You mentioned pylatex some time ago. Is it any good ?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:58:39AM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Sure enough, these "canonical substitutions" must be performed,
Probably not. The math parser understands $$ nowadays...
> but making
> them in a separate phase before parsing (as relyx does) see
Macros do not have to
nest properly. Moreover, it uses fixed values for deliminiters, so this
can't work except for some class of "reasonably well-behaved LaTeX" - and
we have reLyX for this job already. At it seems to have the same broken
two-stage process full tokenization/full parsing tha
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote:
Qnd I think that once this is removed, the code removal you said
did not work would actually work.
Andre I tried again, and now it does not translate tables
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Qnd I think that once this is removed, the code removal you said
>> did not work would actually work.
Andre> I tried again, and now it does not
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote:
Why don't you remove the appended part of syntax.defaults? Doesn't
it do additional (and unneeded/unwanted) changes to the maths?
Andre Because I've not seen
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Qnd I think that once this is removed, the code removal you said did
not work would actually work.
I tried again, and now it does not translate tables anymore.
Actually, this starts to piss me off, and I think I'd just
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Why don't you remove the appended part of syntax.defaults? Doesn't
>> it do additional (and unneeded/unwanted) changes to the maths?
Andre> Because
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Qnd I think that once this is removed, the code removal you said did
> not work would actually work.
I tried again, and now it does not translate tables anymore.
Actually, this starts to piss me off, and I think I'd just
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize
Andre some math stuff from reLyX and happens to fix the underscores
Andre in labels bug.
You should also probably remove the reLyXmt thing at the end. Please
check first whether
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Then you will need to update the BUGS file (probably just removing
text :) and also take a look at what the man page says. It is probable
that only you know what things reLyX still needs to do about math.
Actually, reLyX
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
but those may need support:
\sb{_}
\sp{^}
\ensuremath {} % If it's in math mode, \ensuremath is unnec.
These seem to work ok.
The only glitch I found is the translation of {\cal X} which reLyX
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote:
but those may need support:
\sb {_} \sp {^} \ensuremath {} % If it's in math mode, \ensuremath
is unnec.
Andre These seem to work ok.
Fine. Then you can
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre These seem to work ok.
Fine. Then you can remove the whole reLyXmt environment support...
Hm, could we do this in small steps?
Other things I see by a cursory grep:
BasicLyX.pm:
- update the $MathEnvironments
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: These seem to work ok.
Fine. Then you can remove the whole reLyXmt environment support...
Andre Hm, could we do this in small steps?
Yes, but at least mark
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre All of them are handled.
But you had to add some other environments to the variable, right?
I never touched reLyX before as far as I remember. So, no.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre wrote: All of them are handled.
But you had to add some other environments to the variable, right?
Andre I never touched reLyX before as far as I remember. So
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Forget about that. I am probably confused.
Now, of course we will have the problem that relyx produces a
\lyxformat 2.15 file which is not really suitable for old lyxen. This
is going to get worse if we get to update
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But maybe are we safe by setting the lyxformat to the oldest
construct contained in the file.
Andre I don't think so. 1.1.6 won't be able to read the unfixed
Andre math produced by the new reLyX.
Andre But then, why should a 1.1.6 user use
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:07:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre I don't think so. 1.1.6 won't be able to read the unfixed
Andre math produced by the new reLyX.
Andre But then, why should a 1.1.6 user use a reLyX that ships with
Andre 1.3.0?
I think we do not care about
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre So is it ok to apply what I have?
I tend to think so. We'll see what kind of further cleanup is needed.
Unless somebody is willing to do some extensive testing from your
patch.
Can you post it again, BTW?
JMarc
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/BUGS,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 BUGS
--- BUGS29 Mar 2000 23:02:35 - 1.2
+++ BUGS16 Oct 2002 10:52:58 -
-12,16 +12,11 is probably simplest to fix in the LyX f
you're
it.
%While copying things in math mode, reLyX will replace anything of the
% following commands with (exactly) whatever text is in braces, so, e.g.,
% $x\sb{a}$ will be converted to $x_{a}$ in the LyX file.
%In most cases, this simply avoids evil red text in math mode, but
% in a couple cases
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Why don't you remove the appended part of syntax.defaults? Doesn't it
do additional (and unneeded/unwanted) changes to the maths?
Because I've not seen that part...
Yes, this can go as well.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize
Andre> some math stuff from reLyX and happens to fix the "underscores
Andre> in labels bug".
You should also probably
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Then you will need to update the BUGS file (probably just removing
> text :) and also take a look at what the man page says. It is probable
> that only you know what things reLyX still needs to do about math.
Actual
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> but those may need support:
>
> \sb{_}
> \sp{^}
> \ensuremath {} % If it's in math mode, \ensuremath is unnec.
These seem to work ok.
The only glitch I found is the translation of {\cal
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:32:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> but those may need support:
>>
>> \sb {_} \sp {^} \ensuremath {} % If it's in math mode, \ensuremath
>> is unnec.
Andre> These seem to work ok.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> These seem to work ok.
>
> Fine. Then you can remove the whole reLyXmt environment support...
Hm, could we do this in small steps?
> Other things I see by a cursory grep:
>
> BasicLyX.pm:
>
> - update the
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:03:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: These seem to work ok.
>> Fine. Then you can remove the whole reLyXmt environment support...
Andre> Hm, could we do this in small steps?
Yes, but at
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> All of them are handled.
>
> But you had to add some other environments to the variable, right?
I never touched reLyX before as far as I remember. So, no.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Free
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:45:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: All of them are handled.
>> But you had to add some other environments to the variable, right?
Andre> I n
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Forget about that. I am probably confused.
>
> Now, of course we will have the problem that relyx produces a
> \lyxformat 2.15 file which is not really suitable for old lyxen. This
> is going to g
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But maybe are we safe by setting the lyxformat to the oldest
>> construct contained in the file.
Andre> I don't think so. 1.1.6 won't be able to read the "unfixed"
Andre> mat
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:07:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I don't think so. 1.1.6 won't be able to read the "unfixed"
> Andre> math produced by the "new" reLyX.
>
> Andre> But then, why should a 1.1.6 user use a reLyX that ship
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> So is it ok to apply what I have?
I tend to think so. We'll see what kind of further cleanup is needed.
Unless somebody is willing to do some extensive testing from your
patch.
Can you post it again, BTW?
JMarc
UGS
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/BUGS,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 BUGS
--- BUGS29 Mar 2000 23:02:35 - 1.2
+++ BUGS16 Oct 2002 10:52:58 -
@@ -12,16 +12,11 @@ is probably simplest to fix in the Ly
that it *does* support, then we might as well
% translate it.
%While copying things in math mode, reLyX will replace anything of the
% following commands with (exactly) whatever text is in braces, so, e.g.,
% $x\sb{a}$ will be converted to $x_{a}$ in the LyX file.
%In most cases, t
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:36:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Why don't you remove the appended part of syntax.defaults? Doesn't it
> do additional (and unneeded/unwanted) changes to the maths?
Because I've not seen that part...
Yes, this can go as well.
Andre'
--
Those who desire
Just for fun try
de_Userguide.lyx - *.tex (relyx) - 2.15 .lyx - read with CVS LyX
poenitz@millo:/usr/src/lyx/lyx-build/lib/reLyX ../../src/lyx de_UserGuide.lyx
LyXComm: Pipe /tmp/lyxpipe.in already exists.
If no other LyX program is active, please delete the pipe by hand and try
again
update_tabular(body)
File /usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_216.py, line 71, in
upda
e_tabular
cell_info.append(cell_re.match(lines[i]).groups())
AttributeError: 'None' object has no attribute 'groups'
Bye.
This error is on my working list. Hawk presented several
The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize some math stuff
from reLyX and happens to fix the underscores in labels bug.
Note that the [with this patch removed] list of symbols is not the complete
list of symbols known to mathed, so this can't possibly work well
anyway.
After
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize some math stuff
| from reLyX and happens to fix the underscores in labels bug.
| Note that the [with this patch removed] list of symbols is not the complete
| list of symbols known to mathed
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'd like someone more into the reLyX code to say yes, but I am very
positive.
It might be that we have too leave the line with the '' in, but currently
I am unable to say whether it's lyx2lyx or relyx's or patched relyx's
Just for fun try
de_Userguide.lyx -> *.tex (relyx) -> 2.15 .lyx -> read with CVS LyX
poenitz@millo:/usr/src/lyx/lyx-build/lib/reLyX > ../../src/lyx de_UserGuide.lyx
LyXComm: Pipe /tmp/lyxpipe.in already exists.
If no other LyX program is active, please delete the pipe by hand a
> update_tabular(body)
> File "/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/lyxconvert_216.py", line 71, in
> upda
> e_tabular
> cell_info.append(cell_re.match(lines[i]).groups())
> AttributeError: 'None' object has no attribute 'groups'
> Bye.
This error is on my working list. Hawk presented
The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize some math stuff
from reLyX and happens to fix the "underscores in labels bug".
Note that the [with this patch removed] list of symbols is not the complete
list of "symbols known to mathed", so this can't possi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached patch seems to remove the ability to recognize some math stuff
| from reLyX and happens to fix the "underscores in labels bug".
>
| Note that the [with this patch removed] list of symbols is not the complete
| lis
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd like someone more into the reLyX code to say "yes", but I am very
> positive.
It might be that we have too leave the line with the '&' in, but currently
I am unable to say whether it's lyx2lyx o
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
I think I'll have a look at a native .tex parser for LyX in the 1.3.0
series. So WONTFIX would not be the worst
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
| I think I'll have a look at a native .tex parser for LyX
for this, if it is written in Perl,Python or C++ does not matter.
If it works, yes. The perl LaTeX parser package we are using in reLyX
currently just does not the Right Thing. It does not read tokens as LaTeX
does but rather stings that look like LaTeX tokens in most cases. As soon
as someone does
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>
> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
I think I'll have a look at a "native .tex parser" for LyX in the 1.3.0
serie
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>>
>> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
| I think I'll have a look at a &
orks just
> fine for this, if it is written in Perl,Python or C++ does not matter.
If it works, yes. The perl LaTeX parser package we are using in reLyX
currently just "does not the Right Thing". It does not read tokens as LaTeX
does but rather stings that look like LaTeX tokens in m
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
--
Lgb
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
for a week
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
for a week or two, but I will get it done.
We do this in our use
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:15:28AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
for a week or two, but I will get it done.
I've assigned them all to you. Don't worry it doesn't
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
- If it is not realistic that a bug will be fixed within a reasonable
time-frame, mark it as LATER or REMIND.
For a bugzilla as small as LyX's, I'd be happy with resolving as LATER
where appropriate, although this in
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
--
Lgb
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
>
> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
You can go ahead and assign a few to
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
> >
> > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
> You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
> for a week or two, but I will get
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:15:28AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs...
>
> You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done
> for a week or two, but I will get it done.
I've assigned them all to you. Don't worry it
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> - If it is not realistic that a bug will be fixed within a reasonable
> time-frame, mark it as "LATER" or "REMIND".
For a bugzilla as small as LyX's, I'd be happy with resolving as LATER
where appropriate, although
So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
john
--
Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about how this
feature will wipe out humanity or bring us to the promised land.
- Charles Campbell on magic words in Subject: headers
So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ?
john
--
"Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about how this
feature will wipe out humanity or bring us to the promised land."
- Charles Campbell on magic words in Subject: headers
);
?
?
require($footer);
?
@
\end{document}
-
using the command:
reLyX -d search.ltx search.lyx
produced the following error messages:
Unrecognized escape \d passed through at
../share/lyx/reLyX
The same file was smoothly translated into LyX-code when using reLyX
from WITHIN
LyX ! Of course you'll be asking: why is this guy then using the
command-line
version of reLyX ???
Simply put: because I have a bunch of source-files to incorporate into a
noweb-document and need
Hi,
Tried to lyx the following LaTeX-source:
-
\documentclass[a4paper,twoside]{article}
\begin{document}
<>=
@
\end{document}
-
using the command:
reLyX -d search.ltx sear
> The same file was smoothly translated into LyX-code when using reLyX
> from WITHIN
> LyX ! Of course you'll be asking: why is this guy then using the
> command-line
> version of reLyX ???
>
> Simply put: because I have a bunch of source-files to incorporate into a
>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:54:06PM -0800, Eddie Benowitz wrote:
Lyx is a really cool tool. It seems relyx can't
import algorithms or longtables that lyx itself
outputs after an export latex. This would be really
useful. Thanks.
I will look to this issue but I don't promisse to have
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:54:06PM -0800, Eddie Benowitz wrote:
> Lyx is a really cool tool. It seems relyx can't
> import algorithms or longtables that lyx itself
> outputs after an export latex. This would be really
> useful. Thanks.
I will look to this issue but I don't prom
Lyx is a really cool tool. It seems relyx can't
import algorithms or longtables that lyx itself
outputs after an export latex. This would be really
useful. Thanks.
Eddie.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http
Lyx is a really cool tool. It seems relyx can't
import algorithms or longtables that lyx itself
outputs after an export latex. This would be really
useful. Thanks.
Eddie.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:30:52PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
As long as we're at it,
what's the current support for \mbox?
Non-existent in mathed I have to admit. I have thought about it, but even
with the new text insets it is non-trivial as math insets work a bit
differently (they don't have
doubts about the fast version?
I'm trying to add language support to reLyX. That is both \selectlanguage{}
and \foreignlanguage{}{}, where should I look to? Basic_Lyx.pm?
Don't forget \R{} and \L{}
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 08:30:52PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
> As long as we're at it,
> what's the current support for \mbox?
Non-existent in mathed I have to admit. I have thought about it, but even
with the new text insets it is non-trivial as math insets work a bit
differently (they don't
>
> I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
>
> I'm trying to add language support to reLyX. That is both \selectlanguage{}
> and \foreignlanguage{}{}, where should I look to? Basic_Lyx.pm?
Don't forget \R{} and \L{}
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 01:42:12PM -0400, Amir Karger wrote:
[...]
I think the simplest way is just to copy and paste it in.
(I wonder if main::my_fast_abs_path(...) would work?)
I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
I'm trying to add language support to reLyX
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:56:06AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
Since you seem to work on reLyX, could you tell me what math-specific stuff
is done in reLyX?
Andre'
--
André Pönitz
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:56:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:56:06AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
Since you seem to work on reLyX, could you tell me what math-specific stuff
is done
untouched by reLyX...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by reLyX...
Would you consider that a bug so that I can insert a new feature? ;-)
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
José
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:34:07PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:20:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
x^2 is fine in current mathed, and so is '$...$', '$$...$$' and '\cal'.
I can do that.
What else?
I do know reLyX, so I can't tell you what
is '$...$', '$$...$$' and '\cal'.
After that stage all the latex math code is passed untouched to mathed.
Would be nice if all math remains untouched by reLyX...
It's great that you've done a lot of work to support the stuff lyx didn't
used to support which required writing these workarounds
language support to reLyX. That is both \selectlanguage{}
and \foreignlanguage{}{}, where should I look to? Basic_Lyx.pm?
Also to support a new page and line, above and bellow, I have to parse
first the paragraph to compute those parameters.
Should I add both \newpage and \lyxline to syntax.defaul
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:56:06AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
Since you seem to work on reLyX, could you tell me what math-specific stuff
is done in reLyX?
Andre'
--
André Pön
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:56:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:56:06AM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > I'll try that. Why do you have doubts about the fast version?
>
> Since you seem to work on reLyX, could you tell me what math
d to mathed.
Would be nice if all math remains untouched by reLyX...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f all math remains untouched by reLyX...
Would you consider that a bug so that I can insert a new feature? ;-)
> Andre'
>
> --
> André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
José
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 02:34:07PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:20:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > x^2 is fine in current mathed, and so is '$...$', '$$...$$' and '\cal'.
>
> I can do that.
>
> What else?
I do
501 - 600 of 986 matches
Mail list logo
