On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 07:14:38PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 08/10/2016 à 18:03, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
> > Le 08/10/2016 à 15:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:57:27PM +0200, jpc wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > -Format 60
> > > > +Format 68
> > >
>
Le 08/10/2016 à 18:03, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Le 08/10/2016 à 15:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:57:27PM +0200, jpc wrote:
-Format 60
+Format 68
Did you intent to make this change? I think the current format number is
60.
You're right of course, I don't
Le 08/10/2016 à 15:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:57:27PM +0200, jpc wrote:
-Format 60
+Format 68
Did you intent to make this change? I think the current format number is
60.
You're right of course, I don't know where I could see the 68 value.
I will correct
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:57:27PM +0200, jpc wrote:
> commit a214d95513567d9f0a7f8136b5ca4443db94431b
> Author: jpc
> Date: Thu Oct 6 13:52:16 2016 +0100
>
>lettre: remove old workaround about page format in layout and update
> template
> ---
>
> -Format 60
> +Format