On 23/09/2010 5:28 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
I asked on lilypond-user list and there is no safe mode for lilypond-book.
I see three ways o action:
- Request for a safe-mode for lilypond-book, have it fixed upstream, then
support in LyX only newer versions which have a safe
Julien Rioux wrote:
FYI I sent a patch to the lilypond devs [1], this wasn't so hard to do.
Hopefully it gets pushed in before their next release cycle, which would be
version 2.14.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1281
thanks, i filled bug so we dont forget on the
On 23/09/2010 5:28 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
I asked on lilypond-user list and there is no safe mode for lilypond-book.
I see three ways o action:
- Request for a safe-mode for lilypond-book, have it fixed upstream, then
support in LyX only newer versions which have a safe
Julien Rioux wrote:
> FYI I sent a patch to the lilypond devs [1], this wasn't so hard to do.
> Hopefully it gets pushed in before their next release cycle, which would be
> version 2.14.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1281
thanks, i filled bug so we dont forget on
Julien Rioux wrote:
I asked on lilypond-user list and there is no safe mode for lilypond-book.
I see three ways o action:
- Request for a safe-mode for lilypond-book, have it fixed upstream, then
support in LyX only newer versions which have a safe mode. (I'll send the
request to
Julien Rioux wrote:
> I asked on lilypond-user list and there is no safe mode for lilypond-book.
> I see three ways o action:
>
> - Request for a safe-mode for lilypond-book, have it fixed upstream, then
> support in LyX only newer versions which have a safe mode. (I'll send the
> request to
Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks, but hold on... lilypond-book can run evil scheme code included
within the lilypond snippets!
lilypond itself has a -dsafe command-line switch but lilypond-book doesn't
have that, or I couldn't find it. We need to ensure lilypond-book can be
run in safe mode
On 22/09/2010 5:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks, but hold on... lilypond-book can run evil scheme code included
within the lilypond snippets!
lilypond itself has a -dsafe command-line switch but lilypond-book doesn't
have that, or I couldn't find it. We need to ensure
Julien Rioux wrote:
> Thanks, but hold on... lilypond-book can run evil scheme code included
> within the lilypond snippets!
>
> lilypond itself has a -dsafe command-line switch but lilypond-book doesn't
> have that, or I couldn't find it. We need to ensure lilypond-book can be
> run in safe
On 22/09/2010 5:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Thanks, but hold on... lilypond-book can run evil scheme code included
within the lilypond snippets!
lilypond itself has a -dsafe command-line switch but lilypond-book doesn't
have that, or I couldn't find it. We need to ensure
On 09/20/2010 11:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
The lytex converter adds an extra preprocessing step through
i guess thats misunderstanding. there exists special lyx+latex release
called lytex and i thought that you refer to THAT lytex ;)
have you done svn add lytex,
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Same code base, new patch, without using svn cp.
i went briefly through the patch and looks ok. i will wait whether there are
other comments (mainly for the python part which i skipped;) but this can go
in
imho.
its in. you probably want new
On 21/09/2010 12:41 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Same code base, new patch, without using svn cp.
i went briefly through the patch and looks ok. i will wait whether there are
other comments (mainly for the python part which i skipped;) but this can go in
On 09/20/2010 11:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
The "lytex" converter adds an extra preprocessing step through
i guess thats misunderstanding. there exists special lyx+latex release
called lytex and i thought that you refer to THAT lytex ;)
have you done svn add lytex,
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Julien Rioux wrote:
> > Same code base, new patch, without using "svn cp".
>
> i went briefly through the patch and looks ok. i will wait whether there are
> other comments (mainly for the python part which i skipped;) but this can go
> in
> imho.
its in. you probably want
On 21/09/2010 12:41 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
Same code base, new patch, without using "svn cp".
i went briefly through the patch and looks ok. i will wait whether there are
other comments (mainly for the python part which i skipped;) but this can go in
Dear devs,
Please have a look at the attached, an updated patch to provide
lilypond-book support: Inclusion of lilypond code directly in LyX. This
is done with a module with OutputFormat keyword and (at the moment) a
simple inset. The preview mechanism is extended to allow for musical
Julien Rioux wrote:
- if (!pconverter_){
- if (b.params().encoding().package() == Encoding::japanese)
- pconverter_ = setConverter(lyxpreview-platex);
- else
- pconverter_ = setConverter(lyxpreview);
- }
+ if
On 20/09/2010 5:16 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
- if (!pconverter_){
- if (b.params().encoding().package() == Encoding::japanese)
- pconverter_ = setConverter(lyxpreview-platex);
- else
- pconverter_ =
On 20/09/2010 5:16 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
--- lib/scripts/lyxpreview-lytex2bitmap.py (revision 35036)
this file does not exists in lyx proper...
there are many other links to lytex in your patch, so before diving in, please
send
updated version...
pavel
Same code base, new patch,
Julien Rioux wrote:
The lytex converter adds an extra preprocessing step through
i guess thats misunderstanding. there exists special lyx+latex release
called lytex and i thought that you refer to THAT lytex ;)
have you done svn add lytex, because i dont see any such script in the diff...?
On 20/09/2010 5:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
The lytex converter adds an extra preprocessing step through
i guess thats misunderstanding. there exists special lyx+latex release
called lytex and i thought that you refer to THAT lytex ;)
have you done svn add lytex, because i
Julien Rioux wrote:
\begin{lilypond}...\end{lilypond} snippets. I started using that extension
too, but we can choose something else.
no, its ok. the current version makes sense to me.
pavel
Julien Rioux wrote:
Same code base, new patch, without using svn cp.
i went briefly through the patch and looks ok. i will wait whether there are
other comments (mainly for the python part which i skipped;) but this can go in
imho.
pavel
Dear devs,
Please have a look at the attached, an updated patch to provide
lilypond-book support: Inclusion of lilypond code directly in LyX. This
is done with a module with OutputFormat keyword and (at the moment) a
simple inset. The preview mechanism is extended to allow for musical
Julien Rioux wrote:
> - if (!pconverter_){
> - if (b.params().encoding().package() == Encoding::japanese)
> - pconverter_ = setConverter("lyxpreview-platex");
> - else
> - pconverter_ = setConverter("lyxpreview");
> - }
> +
On 20/09/2010 5:16 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
- if (!pconverter_){
- if (b.params().encoding().package() == Encoding::japanese)
- pconverter_ = setConverter("lyxpreview-platex");
- else
- pconverter_ =
On 20/09/2010 5:16 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
--- lib/scripts/lyxpreview-lytex2bitmap.py (revision 35036)
this file does not exists in lyx proper...
there are many other links to lytex in your patch, so before diving in, please
send
updated version...
pavel
Same code base, new patch,
Julien Rioux wrote:
> The "lytex" converter adds an extra preprocessing step through
i guess thats misunderstanding. there exists special lyx+latex release
called lytex and i thought that you refer to THAT lytex ;)
have you done svn add lytex, because i dont see any such script in the diff...?
On 20/09/2010 5:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Julien Rioux wrote:
The "lytex" converter adds an extra preprocessing step through
i guess thats misunderstanding. there exists special lyx+latex release
called lytex and i thought that you refer to THAT lytex ;)
have you done svn add lytex, because i
Julien Rioux wrote:
> \begin{lilypond}...\end{lilypond} snippets. I started using that extension
> too, but we can choose something else.
no, its ok. the current version makes sense to me.
pavel
Julien Rioux wrote:
> Same code base, new patch, without using "svn cp".
i went briefly through the patch and looks ok. i will wait whether there are
other comments (mainly for the python part which i skipped;) but this can go in
imho.
pavel
32 matches
Mail list logo
