OK.
JMarc
Le 6 novembre 2016 16:33:09 GMT+01:00, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
>
>Most of the times it is already clear from the other lines that the
>text
>is justified. In addition, on-screen justification cannot be much more
>than cosmetic anyway, since there is an option to
Le 06/11/2016 à 16:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Something I meant to mention: shall we add some on screen cue that the
row has not been completely stretched ?
JMarc
Most of the times it is already clear from the other lines that the text
is justified. In addition, on-screen
Something I meant to mention: shall we add some on screen cue that the row has
not been completely stretched ?
JMarc
Le 6 novembre 2016 14:57:30 GMT+01:00, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
>Le 29/08/2016 à 14:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>>
>> The patch looks good.
>
>It's in at
Le 29/08/2016 à 14:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
The patch looks good.
It's in at b30f8d3c4b
Le 29/08/2016 à 13:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 29/08/2016 à 00:29, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Dear list
Attached is a patch that changes some details about text justification.
The spacing is distributed proportionally to the em size (if a row mixes
two font heights one can see
Le 29/08/2016 à 00:29, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Dear list
Attached is a patch that changes some details about text justification.
The spacing is distributed proportionally to the em size (if a row mixes
two font heights one can see distinguish spaces in the big font from
spaces in the small
Dear list
Attached is a patch that changes some details about text justification.
The spacing is distributed proportionally to the em size (if a row mixes
two font heights one can see distinguish spaces in the big font from
spaces in the small font). Moreover an upper bound is set on the spacing