On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:50:17PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
+ [...] 'psuedo' [...]
The truoble with that langauge of yuors is that their is no ricognizible
pattern in the youse of vowils.
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:50:17PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
+ [...] 'psuedo' [...]
The truoble with that langauge of yuors is that their is no
ricognizible pattern in the youse of vowils.
And the azamnig tnhig aobut Egnlsih is taht tehre dosen't need to be
to
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:22:03AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:50:17PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
+ [...] 'psuedo' [...]
The truoble with that langauge of yuors is that their is no
ricognizible pattern in the youse of vowils.
And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 00:11, Angus Leeming wrote:
Try 3, Kornel.
This one should feel much smoother when you move the mouse back into
the work area. In fact, I thnk that this is ready to go into the
sources (and, indeed, be ported to 1.3.x) but
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Srue. Wrkos eevn in Grmaen.
The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
Incidentally, how long did it take you to rearrange the letters in
alphabetical order?
--
Angus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 10:55, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Srue. Wrkos eevn in Grmaen.
The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
Incidentally, how long did it take
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:55:23AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Srue. Wrkos eevn in Grmaen.
The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
Incidentally, how long did it take you to rearrange the letters
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
Incidentally, how long did it take you to rearrange the letters in
alphabetical order?
Not long, about 10
Kornel Benko wrote:
Sorry for the late reply .. I had to support a customer ..
;-)
Yes, selecting above and/or below the workarea is smoother. This I
like. But, may it be possible to disable the timer while selecting
inside the workarea? It is a little annoying to have to wait for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 11:09, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Not long, about 10 seconds.
That's not bad. How did you do that?
It was a very long word. There are not too many long-word-examples. Some of them
are starting with Donau ...
One of them ends with
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:12:20AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 11:09, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Not long, about 10 seconds.
That's not bad. How did you do that?
It was a very long word. There are not too many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 11:18, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Ahm... I thought Angus was asking how to create the example, not how to
recreate the original word...
Oh, you are right.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:50:17PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> + [...] 'psuedo' [...]
The truoble with that langauge of yuors is that their is no ricognizible
pattern in the youse of vowils.
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:50:17PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> + [...] 'psuedo' [...]
>
> The truoble with that langauge of yuors is that their is no
> ricognizible pattern in the youse of vowils.
And the azamnig tnhig aobut Egnlsih is taht tehre dosen't need to be
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:22:03AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:50:17PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> + [...] 'psuedo' [...]
> >
> > The truoble with that langauge of yuors is that their is no
> > ricognizible pattern in the youse of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 00:11, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Try 3, Kornel.
> >
> > This one should feel much smoother when you move the mouse back into
> > the work area. In fact, I thnk that this is ready to go into the
> > sources (and, indeed, be ported to
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Srue. Wrkos eevn in Grmaen.
>
> The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
Incidentally, how long did it take you to rearrange the letters in
alphabetical order?
--
Angus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 10:55, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Srue. Wrkos eevn in Grmaen.
> >
> > The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
>
> ...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
>
> Incidentally, how long did
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:55:23AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Srue. Wrkos eevn in Grmaen.
> >
> > The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
>
> ...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
>
> Incidentally, how long did it take you to rearrange
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > The cssliac elpmaxe is 'Dcdhhiikmmnnopprssstttuzäüe'
> >
> > ...which goes to prove something or other ;-)
> >
> > Incidentally, how long did it take you to rearrange the letters in
> > alphabetical order?
>
> Not long,
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply .. I had to support a customer ..
;-)
> Yes, selecting above and/or below the workarea is smoother. This I
> like. But, may it be possible to disable the timer while selecting
> inside the workarea? It is a little annoying to have to wait for the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 11:09, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Not long, about 10 seconds.
>
> That's not bad. How did you do that?
It was a very long word. There are not too many long-word-examples. Some of them
are starting with Donau ...
One of them ends with
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:12:20AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 11:09, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Not long, about 10 seconds.
> >
> > That's not bad. How did you do that?
>
> It was a very long word. There are not too many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 11:18, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Ahm... I thought Angus was asking how to create the example, not how to
> recreate the original word...
Oh, you are right.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP
Kornel Benko wrote:
On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 11:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
The patch has the timout returning after 400ms. Could you modify
the code to return after 200ms and see how that feels please.
I would, but the patch is not applying anymore to cvs. I am at work
now, and don't have
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 11:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
The patch has the timout returning after 400ms. Could you modify
the code to return after 200ms and see how that feels please.
I would, but the patch is not applying anymore to cvs. I am at work
now, and don't have
Kornel Benko wrote:
Ok, Kornel, try 2.
* revert yesterday's patch.
* cvs up
* apply the patch attached.
Something fishy hier ...
3.57 korben.kornel 22:51 patch -p0
'/tmp/kde-kornel/kmailfnaUvb.3/qt.diff' patching file
src/frontends/qt2//QContentPane.C Hunk #3 succeeded at 79 with fuzz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 11:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
The patch has the timout returning after 400ms. Could you modify the
code to return after 200ms and see how that feels please.
I would, but the patch is not applying anymore to cvs. I am at work now,
and
Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Ok, Kornel, try 2.
>> * revert yesterday's patch.
>> * cvs up
>> * apply the patch attached.
> Something fishy hier ...
> 3.57 korben.kornel 22:51 > patch -p0 <
> '/tmp/kde-kornel/kmailfnaUvb.3/qt.diff' patching file
> src/frontends/qt2//QContentPane.C Hunk #3 succeeded at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 11:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The patch has the timout returning after 400ms. Could you modify the
> code to return after 200ms and see how that feels please.
I would, but the patch is not applying anymore to cvs. I am at work now,
Kornel Benko wrote:
> On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 11:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> The patch has the timout returning after 400ms. Could you modify
>> the code to return after 200ms and see how that feels please.
>
> I would, but the patch is not applying anymore to cvs. I am at work
> now, and
Angus Leeming wrote:
>> On Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 11:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
>>> The patch has the timout returning after 400ms. Could you modify
>>> the code to return after 200ms and see how that feels please.
>>
>> I would, but the patch is not applying anymore to cvs. I am at work
>> now,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 29. November 2003 22:20, Angus Leeming wrote:
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives you
scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor above/below the work
Kornel Benko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 29. November 2003 22:20, Angus Leeming wrote:
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
you scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor
Kornel Benko wrote:
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
you scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor above/below the work
area, you should get 'sensible' scrolling behaviour.
Try it out and let me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sonntag, 30. November 2003 18:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 29. November 2003 22:20, Angus Leeming wrote:
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sonntag, 30. November 2003 19:32, Angus Leeming wrote:
Kornel Benko wrote:
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
you scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Samstag, 29. November 2003 22:20, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives you
> scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
>
> Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor above/below the work
Kornel Benko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Samstag, 29. November 2003 22:20, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
>> you scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
>>
>> Specifically, if you move the
Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
>> you scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
>>
>> Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor above/below the work
>> area, you should get 'sensible' scrolling behaviour.
>>
>> Try it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sonntag, 30. November 2003 18:21, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > On Samstag, 29. November 2003 22:20, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sonntag, 30. November 2003 19:32, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives
> >> you scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
> >>
> >> Specifically, if you move the
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives you
scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor above/below the work area,
you should get 'sensible' scrolling behaviour.
Try it out and let me know.
Angus
ps, Using
Could the Qt-ers amongst you try out the attached patch. It gives you
scrolling behaviour similar to that of the xforms frontend.
Specifically, if you move the mouse cursor above/below the work area,
you should get 'sensible' scrolling behaviour.
Try it out and let me know.
Angus
ps, Using
44 matches
Mail list logo
