Bo Peng wrote:
I have submitted your patch with Include dialog changes. Please test.
lyx2lyx changes will be added soon.
Thanks.
The one issue I already mentioned: in the navigte menu, the
category Listings is not indocated correctly. Anyone an idea?
Now, it is again qt experts' turn to fix
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Now, it is again qt experts' turn to fix the include dialog. WHY the
hell the editboxes are much larger than they are in designer?
Edwin?
committed a tweak
Bo Peng wrote:
> I have submitted your patch with Include dialog changes. Please test.
> lyx2lyx changes will be added soon.
Thanks.
The one issue I already mentioned: in the navigte menu, the
category "Listings" is not indocated correctly. Anyone an idea?
> Now, it is again qt experts' turn to
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Now, it is again qt experts' turn to fix the include dialog. WHY the
>> hell the editboxes are much larger than they are in designer?
>
> Edwin?
committed a tweak
One thing I don't like about the listings implementation is that you have to
insert the caption via the dialog (which is not only unusual, but also
doesn't let you use the crossrefs dialog etc.).
The attached patch uses the caption and label insets instead. It needs
testing.
If we'd put this
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
One thing I don't like about the listings implementation is that you have to
insert the caption via the dialog (which is not only unusual, but also
doesn't let you use the crossrefs dialog etc.).
The attached patch uses the caption and label insets instead. It needs
This looks not only natural but the right thing to do. I vote YES :-)
Thank you very much! I thought of this as well but did not gather
enough time to think about it.
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
Cheers,
Bo
g++ -o
Bo Peng wrote:
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
Should be fine now, sorry.
Abdel.
Bo Peng wrote:
Thank you very much! I thought of this as well but did not gather
enough time to think about it.
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
Please do if trunk works again, and report back.
Known issues:
- The listings are put to
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
A few questions:
1. You mentioned file format change but no lyx2lyx stuff in your patch.
2. Should caption be removed from the listings dialog? Or should the
caption inset automatically reflects the
Bo Peng wrote:
A few questions:
1. You mentioned file format change but no lyx2lyx stuff in your patch.
I haven't done anything yet. Perhaps we don't need it, since no LyX version
with listings hasn't been released yet.
That's why I like to have it included before the next beta.
2. Should
On Monday 14 May 2007 15:02:07 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change the
file format.
These two issues are orthogonal, if there is a file format change we honour
it even if it is inside the same development series. :-)
Jürgen
--
On 5/14/07, José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 15:02:07 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change the
file format.
Hi, Jose,
When do you plan to release beta 3? I can modify Jurgen's patch later today
1. add
José Matos wrote:
These two issues are orthogonal, if there is a file format change we honour
it even if it is inside the same development series. :-)
You're right (and Bo already convinced me in PM).
Jürgen
On Monday 14 May 2007 19:05:21 Bo Peng wrote:
On 5/14/07, José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 15:02:07 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change
the file format.
Hi, Jose,
When do you plan to release beta 3? I
Bo Peng wrote:
I can modify Jurgen's patch later today
Bo, please also include this patch (a bugfix and a semantic correction).
Jürgen
Index: src/frontends/qt4/QListings.cpp
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/QListings.cpp (Revision 18312)
Bo, please also include this patch (a bugfix and a semantic correction).
Got it. Thanks.
Bo
If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change the file
format.
I have submitted your patch with Include dialog changes. Please test.
lyx2lyx changes will be added soon.
Now, it is again qt experts' turn to fix the include dialog. WHY the
hell the editboxes are much
One thing I don't like about the listings implementation is that you have to
insert the caption via the dialog (which is not only unusual, but also
doesn't let you use the crossrefs dialog etc.).
The attached patch uses the caption and label insets instead. It needs
testing.
If we'd put this
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
One thing I don't like about the listings implementation is that you have to
insert the caption via the dialog (which is not only unusual, but also
doesn't let you use the crossrefs dialog etc.).
The attached patch uses the caption and label insets instead. It needs
This looks not only natural but the right thing to do. I vote YES :-)
Thank you very much! I thought of this as well but did not gather
enough time to think about it.
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
Cheers,
Bo
g++ -o
Bo Peng wrote:
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
Should be fine now, sorry.
Abdel.
Bo Peng wrote:
> Thank you very much! I thought of this as well but did not gather
> enough time to think about it.
>
> I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
> not test your patch.
Please do if trunk works again, and report back.
Known issues:
- The listings are
I vote yes to put it in except that the trunk is broken now so I can
not test your patch.
A few questions:
1. You mentioned file format change but no lyx2lyx stuff in your patch.
2. Should caption be removed from the listings dialog? Or should the
caption inset automatically reflects the
Bo Peng wrote:
> A few questions:
>
> 1. You mentioned file format change but no lyx2lyx stuff in your patch.
I haven't done anything yet. Perhaps we don't need it, since no LyX version
with listings hasn't been released yet.
That's why I like to have it included before the next beta.
> 2.
On Monday 14 May 2007 15:02:07 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change the
> file format.
These two issues are orthogonal, if there is a file format change we honour
it even if it is inside the same development series. :-)
> Jürgen
--
On 5/14/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 15:02:07 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change the
> file format.
Hi, Jose,
When do you plan to release beta 3? I can modify Jurgen's patch later today
1. add
José Matos wrote:
> These two issues are orthogonal, if there is a file format change we honour
> it even if it is inside the same development series. :-)
You're right (and Bo already convinced me in PM).
Jürgen
On Monday 14 May 2007 19:05:21 Bo Peng wrote:
> On 5/14/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 14 May 2007 15:02:07 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change
> > > the file format.
>
> Hi, Jose,
>
> When do you plan to
Bo Peng wrote:
> I can modify Jurgen's patch later today
Bo, please also include this patch (a bugfix and a semantic correction).
Jürgen
Index: src/frontends/qt4/QListings.cpp
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/QListings.cpp (Revision 18312)
Bo, please also include this patch (a bugfix and a semantic correction).
Got it. Thanks.
Bo
If we'd put this in before the next beta, we wouldn't need to change the file
format.
I have submitted your patch with Include dialog changes. Please test.
lyx2lyx changes will be added soon.
Now, it is again qt experts' turn to fix the include dialog. WHY the
hell the editboxes are much
32 matches
Mail list logo
